• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism testing on the risk of stent thrombosis in patients with carotid artery stenting.CYP2C19基因多态性检测对颈动脉支架置入患者支架内血栓形成风险的影响。
Pharmacogenomics. 2025 Jan-Feb;26(1-2):31-37. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2025.2478810. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Impact of CYP2C19 variant genotypes on clinical efficacy of antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel: systematic review and meta-analysis.CYP2C19 基因变异对氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗临床疗效的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Aug 4;343:d4588. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4588.
3
Real-world evaluation of guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair.颅内动脉瘤修复术后患者的抗血小板治疗的真实世界评估。
Pharmacogenomics. 2024;25(12-13):503-513. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2406213. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
4
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗的疗程:针对2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程重点更新指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e156-78. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000405. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents versus bare stents for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis.聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架与裸支架经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化的效果比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 2;8(8):CD012358. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012358.pub2.
6
Clinical non-effectiveness of clopidogrel use for peripheral artery disease in patients with CYP2C19 polymorphisms: a systematic review.CYP2C19 基因多态性患者外周动脉疾病中氯吡格雷临床无效的系统评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;78(8):1217-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03346-7. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
7
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for primary prevention of thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies.抗血小板和抗凝药物用于抗磷脂抗体个体血栓形成的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD012534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012534.pub2.
8
Short term versus long term dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug eluting stent in patients with or without diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者药物洗脱支架植入术后短期与长期双重抗血小板治疗:来自随机试验的个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Nov 3;355:i5483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5483.
9
CYP2C19 genotype, clopidogrel metabolism, platelet function, and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CYP2C19 基因型、氯吡格雷代谢、血小板功能与心血管事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2011 Dec 28;306(24):2704-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1880.
10
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗时间:2016 年 ACC/AHA 指南双联抗血小板治疗时间的聚焦更新:冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗时间的临床实践指南——美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1116-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.512. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing a Neurointerventional Procedure.CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗与接受神经介入手术患者的临床结局
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70131. doi: 10.1111/cts.70131.
2
Real-world evaluation of guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair.颅内动脉瘤修复术后患者的抗血小板治疗的真实世界评估。
Pharmacogenomics. 2024;25(12-13):503-513. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2406213. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype Status on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease, Stroke, and Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.CYP2C19 基因型状态对有症状的冠状动脉疾病、中风和外周动脉疾病患者临床结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2024 Oct;84(10):1275-1297. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02076-7. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Analysis of the effect of CYP2C19 gene properties on the anti-platelet aggregation of clopidogrel after carotid artery stenting under network pharmacology.基于网络药理学分析 CYP2C19 基因特性对颈动脉支架置入术后氯吡格雷抗血小板聚集的影响。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024 Jun 6;25(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40360-024-00750-w.
5
The effects of CYP2C19 genotype polymorphism and clopidogrel resistance on ischemic event occurrence in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing revascularization: A prospective cohort study.CYP2C19基因多态性和氯吡格雷抵抗对接受血运重建的外周动脉疾病患者缺血事件发生的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Thromb Res. 2024 Apr;236:37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
6
The impact of CYP3A5*3 on oral quetiapine: A population pharmacokinetic model in Chinese bipolar disorder patients.CYP3A5*3 对口服喹硫平的影响:中国双相情感障碍患者的群体药代动力学模型。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 15;351:309-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.170. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
7
Carotid endarterectomy or stenting or best medical treatment alone for moderate-to-severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: 5-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术或最佳药物治疗单独用于中重度无症状颈动脉狭窄:一项多中心、随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):877-888. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00290-3.
8
CYP2C19 genotype-guided antithrombotic treatment versus conventional clopidogrel therapy in peripheral arterial disease: study design of a randomized controlled trial (GENPAD).CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗栓治疗与传统氯吡格雷治疗在周围动脉疾病中的比较:一项随机对照试验(GENPAD)的研究设计
Am Heart J. 2022 Dec;254:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Clinical non-effectiveness of clopidogrel use for peripheral artery disease in patients with CYP2C19 polymorphisms: a systematic review.CYP2C19 基因多态性患者外周动脉疾病中氯吡格雷临床无效的系统评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;78(8):1217-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03346-7. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
10
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Therapy: 2022 Update.临床药物遗传学实施联盟 CYP2C19 基因型和氯吡格雷治疗指南:2022 更新版。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Nov;112(5):959-967. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2526. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

CYP2C19基因多态性检测对颈动脉支架置入患者支架内血栓形成风险的影响。

Impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism testing on the risk of stent thrombosis in patients with carotid artery stenting.

作者信息

Yuan Huai Wu, Huang Xia, Pan Min Ying, Chen Xuan Yu, Hu Yun Zhen, Lin Mei Hua, Wang Jian Er, Wu Yong, Hu Jun, Cao Mei Ling, Liang Hui

机构信息

Department of neurology, The first affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university, Hang-Zhou, China.

Department of neurology, People's Hospital of Pu-Jiang county, Jin-Hua, China.

出版信息

Pharmacogenomics. 2025 Jan-Feb;26(1-2):31-37. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2025.2478810. Epub 2025 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1080/14622416.2025.2478810
PMID:40162622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11988242/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism testing on clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. CYP2C19 polymorphisms were identified based on the presence of two normal functional alleles in normal metabolizers (NMs), a normal functional allele and a nonfunctional allele in intermediate metabolizers and two nonfunctional alleles in poor metabolizers. Patients were recommended for the CYP2C19 polymorphism testing followed by the change in dual antithrombotic drugs (DAPT) at the discretion of the supervising physician. The primary clinical endpoint was stent thrombosis (ST). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relative risk of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 273 patients were included. The relative risk of ST was not reduced in patients who underwent CYP2C19 polymorphism testing than in patients without this test (3.1% vs. 3.9%, OR = 0.914, 95% CI = 0.218-3.841). The ST in NMs and non-NMs was 3.4% and 2.9%, respectively, and showing no reduction in NMs (OR = 1.145, 95% CI = 0.162-8.105). Changing DAPT did not reduce the relative risk of ST compared with non-changing (2.3% vs. 3.2%, OR = 1.604, 95% CI = 0.024-107.033).

CONCLUSIONS

CYP2C19 polymorphism was not related to stent thrombosis in patients with CAS.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定CYP2C19基因多态性检测对接受颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)患者临床结局的影响。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。根据正常代谢者(NMs)中两个正常功能等位基因的存在情况、中间代谢者中一个正常功能等位基因和一个无功能等位基因以及慢代谢者中两个无功能等位基因来确定CYP2C19基因多态性。患者被建议进行CYP2C19基因多态性检测,随后由主管医生酌情改变双联抗血栓药物(DAPT)。主要临床终点是支架血栓形成(ST)。采用逻辑回归评估临床结局的相对风险。

结果

共纳入273例患者。接受CYP2C19基因多态性检测的患者发生ST的相对风险并不低于未进行此项检测的患者(3.1%对3.9%,OR = 0.914,95%CI = 0.218 - 3.841)。NMs和非NMs的ST发生率分别为3.4%和2.9%,NMs中ST发生率未降低(OR = 1.145,95%CI = 0.162 - 8.105)。与未改变DAPT相比,改变DAPT并未降低ST的相对风险(2.3%对3.2%,OR = 1.604,95%CI = 0.024 - 107.033)。

结论

CAS患者中CYP2C19基因多态性与支架血栓形成无关。