Li Jeremy, Dendukuri Nandini, Longtin Yves, Banz Alice, Frenette Charles, Gervais Philippe, Miller Mark A, Bourgault Anne-Marie, Dawang Noah L, Loo Vivian G
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 May 14;63(5):e0180724. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01807-24. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
The diagnosis of infection (CDI) remains challenging. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) targeting the (CD) toxin B gene suffer from suboptimal specificity for CDI due to CD asymptomatic colonization. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) that detect the presence of CD toxins are more specific for CDI but suffer from low sensitivity. To address this challenge, assays detecting CD toxins were developed using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology, which have much lower limits of toxin detection than conventional EIAs. In this study, stool specimens from 708 symptomatic patients were aliquoted for testing by cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), toxigenic culture, NAAT, conventional CD toxin EIA, and SIMOA CD toxin EIAs. Using latent class analysis, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each of these diagnostic tests for detecting, separately, the presence of CD bacterium, CD toxin gene, and CD toxin. We estimated that the prevalence of CDI in our cohort was 14% (95% credible interval [CI]: 0.11-0.17). While the specificity of NAAT for detecting the presence of CD toxin was 95% (95% CI: 0.94-0.97), its positive predictive value was poor due to the low prevalence of CDI. The specificity of the conventional CD toxin EIA for CDI was excellent, but the sensitivity was only 48% (95% CI: 0.41-0.55). In comparison, the sensitivities of the SIMOA toxins A and B EIAs were 76% (95% CI: 0.67-0.84) and 77% (95% CI: 0.67-0.84), respectively, while maintaining excellent specificity. We conclude that SIMOA CD toxin EIAs are significantly more sensitive than conventional CD toxin EIAs.
infection (CDI) is the most important infectious cause of hospital-associated diarrhea worldwide, but its diagnosis remains challenging. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) targeting the (CD) toxin B gene have suboptimal specificity due to the presence of CD asymptomatic colonization, while enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) that detect the toxin itself are much more specific but are limited by low sensitivity. New assays for detecting CD toxins were developed using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology, which have much lower limits of toxin detection than conventional EIAs, potentially improving the sensitivity of these conventional EIAs while remaining highly specific. In this study, we use latent class analysis to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of different diagnostic tests for CD, including the novel SIMOA toxin assays, in detecting the different CD targets: the presence of CD bacterium, the presence of CD toxin gene, and the presence of CD toxin.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的诊断仍然具有挑战性。针对艰难梭菌(CD)毒素B基因的核酸扩增检测(NAAT),由于CD无症状定植,对CDI的特异性欠佳。检测CD毒素存在的酶免疫测定(EIA)对CDI更具特异性,但灵敏度较低。为应对这一挑战,利用单分子阵列(SIMOA)技术开发了检测CD毒素的检测方法,其毒素检测限比传统EIA低得多。在本研究中,将708例有症状患者的粪便标本进行分装,通过细胞毒性中和试验(CCNA)、产毒培养、NAAT、传统CD毒素EIA和SIMOA CD毒素EIA进行检测。使用潜在类别分析,我们分别计算了这些诊断测试在检测CD细菌、CD毒素基因和CD毒素存在时的灵敏度和特异性。我们估计我们队列中CDI的患病率为14%(95%可信区间[CI]:0.11 - 0.17)。虽然NAAT检测CD毒素存在的特异性为95%(95%CI:0.94 - 0.97),但由于CDI患病率低,其阳性预测值较差。传统CD毒素EIA对CDI的特异性极佳,但灵敏度仅为48%(95%CI:0.41 - 0.55)。相比之下,SIMOA毒素A和B EIA的灵敏度分别为76%(95%CI:0.67 - 0.84)和77%(95%CI:0.67 - 0.84),同时保持了极佳的特异性。我们得出结论,SIMOA CD毒素EIA比传统CD毒素EIA的灵敏度显著更高。
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是全球医院相关腹泻最重要的感染原因,但其诊断仍然具有挑战性。针对艰难梭菌(CD)毒素B基因的核酸扩增检测(NAATs)由于存在CD无症状定植,特异性欠佳,而检测毒素本身的酶免疫测定(EIAs)特异性更强,但受低灵敏度限制。利用单分子阵列(SIMOA)技术开发了检测CD毒素的新检测方法,其毒素检测限比传统EIA低得多,有可能提高这些传统EIA的灵敏度,同时保持高特异性。在本研究中,我们使用潜在类别分析来评估不同CD诊断测试,包括新型SIMOA毒素检测,在检测不同CD靶点(CD细菌的存在、CD毒素基因的存在和CD毒素的存在)时的灵敏度和特异性。