Song Linan, Zhao Mingwei, Duffy David C, Hansen Joshua, Shields Kelsey, Wungjiranirun Manida, Chen Xinhua, Xu Hua, Leffler Daniel A, Sambol Susan P, Gerding Dale N, Kelly Ciarán P, Pollock Nira R
Quanterix Corporation, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Oct;53(10):3204-12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01334-15. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
The currently available diagnostics for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have major limitations. Despite mounting evidence that toxin detection is paramount for diagnosis, conventional toxin immunoassays are insufficiently sensitive and cytotoxicity assays too complex; assays that detect toxigenic organisms (toxigenic culture [TC] and nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT]) are confounded by asymptomatic colonization by toxigenic C. difficile. We developed ultrasensitive digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for toxins A and B using single-molecule array technology and validated the assays using (i) culture filtrates from a panel of clinical C. difficile isolates and (ii) 149 adult stool specimens already tested routinely by NAAT. The digital ELISAs detected toxins A and B in stool with limits of detection of 0.45 and 1.5 pg/ml, respectively, quantified toxins across a 4-log range, and detected toxins from all clinical strains studied. Using specimens that were negative by cytotoxicity assay/TC/NAAT, clinical cutoffs were set at 29.4 pg/ml (toxin A) and 23.3 pg/ml (toxin B); the resulting clinical specificities were 96% and 98%, respectively. The toxin B digital ELISA was 100% sensitive versus cytotoxicity assay. Twenty-five percent and 22% of the samples positive by NAAT and TC, respectively, were negative by the toxin B digital ELISA, consistent with the presence of organism but minimal or no toxin. The mean toxin levels by digital ELISA were 1.5- to 1.7-fold higher in five patients with CDI-attributable severe outcomes, versus 68 patients without, but this difference was not statistically significant. Ultrasensitive digital ELISAs for the detection and quantification of toxins A and B in stool can provide a rapid and simple tool for the diagnosis of CDI with both high analytical sensitivity and high clinical specificity.
目前可用的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)诊断方法存在重大局限性。尽管越来越多的证据表明毒素检测对诊断至关重要,但传统的毒素免疫测定法灵敏度不足,细胞毒性测定法过于复杂;检测产毒菌的测定法(产毒培养[TC]和核酸扩增检测[NAAT])会因产毒艰难梭菌的无症状定植而受到干扰。我们利用单分子阵列技术开发了用于毒素A和B的超灵敏数字酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),并使用(i)一组临床艰难梭菌分离株的培养滤液和(ii)149份已通过NAAT常规检测的成人粪便标本对该测定法进行了验证。数字ELISA分别在粪便中检测毒素A和B,检测限分别为0.45和1.5 pg/ml,在4个对数范围内对毒素进行定量,并检测了所有研究的临床菌株中的毒素。使用细胞毒性测定/TC/NAAT为阴性的标本,临床临界值设定为29.4 pg/ml(毒素A)和23.3 pg/ml(毒素B);由此产生的临床特异性分别为96%和98%。毒素B数字ELISA相对于细胞毒性测定的灵敏度为100%。分别有25%和22%的NAAT和TC检测为阳性的样本,毒素B数字ELISA检测为阴性,这与存在细菌但毒素极少或无毒素的情况一致。与68例无CDI相关严重后果的患者相比,5例有CDI相关严重后果的患者通过数字ELISA检测的平均毒素水平高1.5至1.7倍,但这种差异无统计学意义。用于检测和定量粪便中毒素A和B的超灵敏数字ELISA可为CDI的诊断提供一种快速、简单的工具,具有高分析灵敏度和高临床特异性。