Suppr超能文献

尾状叶切除术真的能改善肝门部胆管癌患者的手术疗效吗?一项多中心回顾性研究。

Does caudate lobe resection really improve the surgical outcomes of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma? A multicenter retrospective study.

作者信息

Tao Ran, Yuan Tong, Cheng Qi, Li Deyu, Liu Qiumeng, Shu Chang, Peng Chuang, Chen Yongjun, Chen Xiaoping, Zhang Erlei, Xiang Shuai

机构信息

Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

Clinical Medical Research Center of Hepatic Surgery at Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430030, China.

出版信息

Sci China Life Sci. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2855-x.

Abstract

In the field of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) treatment, the value of caudate lobe resection (CLR) has not been fully elucidated. Most scholars advocate that the caudate lobe should be routinely resected. To further investigate this issue, this study aims to evaluate the impact of CLR on surgical outcomes of HCCA patients who are judged to have no obvious tumor invasion in the caudate lobe. A retrospective analysis was performed on Bismuth type II, III, or IV HCCA patients who underwent radical resection between October 2005 and April 2023 at three Chinese medical centers. Patients were divided into the CLR group and the no caudate lobe resection (No-CLR) group according to whether CLR was performed or not. Baseline and tumor characteristics as well as perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups using propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 397 HCCA patients underwent radical resection and there were 146 patients in each group after PSM. After PSM, the mortality was similar between the two groups. However, patients in the CLR group had a higher incidence of postoperative ascites (43.8% vs 30.1%, P=0.021), liver failure (15.8% vs 6.2%, P=0.014) and intra-abdominal infection (19.2% vs 8.2%, P=0.010). The R0 rate in the CLR group was significantly higher than that in the No-CLR group (88.4% vs 76.0%, P=0.009). Nevertheless, patients undergoing CLR did not show any improvement in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis showed that CLR was not associated with improved long-term surgical outcomes. The high level of CA19-9 and lower tumor differentiation were associated with worse OS, and adjuvant therapy can significantly improve OS. Lower tumor differentiation and N2 were associated with worse RFS. In summary, there is not yet sufficient evidence to support the routine resection of the caudate lobe during surgery for HCCA. For patients without obvious tumor invasion in the caudate lobe, resection of the lobe should be carefully weighed for its benefits and risks.

摘要

在肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)治疗领域,尾状叶切除术(CLR)的价值尚未完全阐明。大多数学者主张应常规切除尾状叶。为进一步研究此问题,本研究旨在评估CLR对被判定尾状叶无明显肿瘤侵犯的HCCA患者手术结局的影响。对2005年10月至2023年4月在中国三家医疗中心接受根治性切除的Bismuth II型、III型或IV型HCCA患者进行回顾性分析。根据是否进行CLR将患者分为CLR组和非尾状叶切除(No-CLR)组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较两组患者的基线和肿瘤特征以及围手术期结局。共有397例HCCA患者接受了根治性切除,PSM后每组各有146例患者。PSM后,两组患者的死亡率相似。然而,CLR组患者术后腹水发生率更高(43.8%对30.1%,P = 0.021)、肝衰竭发生率更高(15.8%对6.2%,P = 0.014)以及腹腔内感染发生率更高(19.2%对8.2%,P = 0.010)。CLR组的R0切除率显著高于No-CLR组(88.4%对76.0%,P = 0.009)。然而,接受CLR的患者在总生存期(OS)或无复发生存期(RFS)方面并未显示出任何改善。多因素分析表明,CLR与长期手术结局改善无关。CA19-9水平高和肿瘤分化程度低与较差的OS相关,辅助治疗可显著改善OS。肿瘤分化程度低和N2与较差的RFS相关。总之,尚无足够证据支持在HCCA手术中常规切除尾状叶。对于尾状叶无明显肿瘤侵犯的患者,应仔细权衡切除该叶的利弊。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验