Goold J E
Br J Hosp Med. 1985 Jun;33(6):335-40.
The technique of intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) has failed to gain general acceptance among anaesthetists, who are divided into those who never use it, preferring more specific local anaesthetic blocks, and those who would recommend it as the technique of choice for some procedures. Numerous large series have been published, attesting to its general safety, but intermittent accounts of serious side effects and more recent reports of fatalities have called the technique into question, so that a reassessment seems timely.
静脉区域麻醉（IVRA）技术未能在麻醉医生中获得广泛认可，他们分为两类：一类是从不使用该技术，更倾向于采用更具针对性的局部麻醉阻滞；另一类则会推荐其作为某些手术的首选技术。已经发表了大量的系列研究，证明了其总体安全性，但关于严重副作用的间歇性报道以及近期的死亡报告对该技术提出了质疑，因此似乎有必要进行重新评估。
