Nevinsky Georgy A
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2025 Jan;90(Suppl 1):S373-S400. doi: 10.1134/S0006297924604167.
The mechanisms of development of autoimmune, neurological, and viral diseases and the possibilities of immune response to various antigens in these pathologies still pose many questions. Human immune system is theoretically capable of synthesizing about a million antibodies with very different properties against the same antigen. It remains unclear how many antibodies and with what properties can form in healthy people and patients with autoimmune diseases (AIDs). The capabilities of traditional approaches, such as enzyme immunoassay or affinity chromatography of Abs on specific sorbents, in answering these questions and analyzing the diversity of antibodies formed against external and internal antigens, as well as their role in the pathogenesis of various diseases, are very limited. Analysis of monoclonal antibodies in the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using phage display revealed that the number of autoantibodies against DNA and myelin basic protein (MBP) can exceed 3-4 thousand, and approximately 30-40% of them are abzymes capable of hydrolyzing DNA and MBP. However, this approach does not allow to investigate the variety of properties of such antibodies, in particular their catalytic activity. Abzymes can play either positive or negative role in the development of various diseases. For example, in HIV-infected patients, abzymes against viral polymerase and integrase cleave these proteins, thus slowing down the development of immunodeficiency syndrome. Other antibodies play a negative role in the pathogenesis of viral, neurological, and autoimmune diseases. Thus, antibodies capable of hydrolyzing DNA and histones can penetrate through the cellular and nuclear membranes, stimulate cell apoptosis, and, as a result, trigger autoimmune processes in many pathologies. Antibodies against MBP cleave this protein in the membranes of cells in nerve tissues, leading to the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this case, abzymes against individual histones were able to hydrolyze each of these histones, as well as MBP, while Abs against MBP hydrolyzed MBP and all five histones. It has also been established that the substrate specificity of abzymes in the hydrolysis of histones and MBP varied greatly depending on the stage of MS or SLE development. Here, we used this example to analyze in detail the role that abzymes against various antigens play in their expanded involvement in the pathogenesis of some AIDs. The review also describes the impact of defects in the bone marrow stem cell differentiation characteristic of AIDs in the formation of B lymphocytes producing harmful abzymes and summarizes for the first time the data on the exceptional diversity of autoantibodies and abzymes, their unusual biological functions, and involvement in the pathogenesis of autoimmune pathologies.
自身免疫性疾病、神经疾病和病毒性疾病的发病机制以及在这些病理状态下对各种抗原的免疫反应可能性仍然存在许多问题。从理论上讲,人类免疫系统能够针对同一抗原合成约一百万种具有非常不同特性的抗体。目前尚不清楚健康人和自身免疫性疾病(AIDs)患者能形成多少种抗体以及这些抗体具有何种特性。传统方法,如酶免疫测定或在特定吸附剂上对抗体进行亲和层析,在回答这些问题以及分析针对外部和内部抗原形成的抗体多样性及其在各种疾病发病机制中的作用方面,能力非常有限。利用噬菌体展示技术分析系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者血液中的单克隆抗体发现,针对DNA和髓鞘碱性蛋白(MBP)的自身抗体数量可超过3000 - 4000种,其中约30 - 40%是能够水解DNA和MBP的抗体酶。然而,这种方法无法研究此类抗体的各种特性,特别是它们的催化活性。抗体酶在各种疾病的发展中可能发挥正向或负向作用。例如,在HIV感染患者中,针对病毒聚合酶和整合酶的抗体酶可切割这些蛋白质,从而减缓免疫缺陷综合征的发展。其他抗体在病毒性疾病、神经疾病和自身免疫性疾病的发病机制中发挥负向作用。因此,能够水解DNA和组蛋白的抗体可穿透细胞膜和核膜,刺激细胞凋亡,进而在许多病理状态下引发自身免疫过程。针对MBP的抗体可在神经组织细胞的膜中切割该蛋白质,导致多发性硬化症(MS)的发生。在这种情况下,针对单个组蛋白的抗体酶能够水解这些组蛋白以及MBP,而针对MBP的抗体则可水解MBP和所有五种组蛋白。还已确定,抗体酶在水解组蛋白和MBP时的底物特异性会因MS或SLE的发展阶段而有很大差异。在此,我们以这个例子详细分析了针对各种抗原的抗体酶在其更广泛地参与某些自身免疫性疾病发病机制中所起的作用。该综述还描述了自身免疫性疾病特有的骨髓干细胞分化缺陷在产生有害抗体酶的B淋巴细胞形成中的影响,并首次总结了关于自身抗体和抗体酶的异常多样性、它们不同寻常的生物学功能以及参与自身免疫性病理发病机制的数据。