• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国新药可及性与预算影响:政策挑战与启示

New drug accessibility and budgetary impact in South Korea: policy challenges and implications.

作者信息

Hwang Se-Eun, Jang Yoon-A, Lim Kyung-Min, Jung Ji-Won, Lee Jong Hyuk

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Jun;25(5):813-821. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2487468. Epub 2025 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2025.2487468
PMID:40164514
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the accessibility indicators for new drugs in South Korea with those in the United States, Europe, and Japan, and examine the structure of pharmaceutical expenditures in South Korea.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patient accessibility and budget impacts of new drugs were analyzed using two independent datasets. Accessibility was evaluated for 171 drugs approved between 2013 and 2022 based on reimbursement rates, time to listing post-approval, and international comparisons. Budget impact analysis covered 226 new drugs listed from 2012 to 2021, assessing expenditure patterns with an emphasis on risk-sharing agreements and financial implications for the National Health Insurance budget.

RESULTS

Among the 171 new drugs approved between 2013 and 2022, 67.8% were reimbursed as of 1 January 2024. Approval-to-reimbursement timelines varied by drug type and pricing pathway, with drugs listed via the weighted average price pathway receiving faster reimbursement than those evaluated through pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Between 2012 and 2021, new drugs constituted 8.5% of total pharmaceutical expenditures, with oncology drugs incurring the highest annual expenditure per product. Expenditure on new drugs peaked in 2019 but declined thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

While South Korea has effectively controlled pharmaceutical expenditures, allocations for new drugs remain low compared to other major countries.

摘要

背景

比较韩国与美国、欧洲和日本的新药可及性指标,并研究韩国的药品支出结构。

研究设计与方法

使用两个独立数据集分析新药的患者可及性和预算影响。基于报销率、获批后上市时间以及国际比较,对2013年至2022年期间获批的171种药物的可及性进行了评估。预算影响分析涵盖了2012年至2021年上市的226种新药,评估了支出模式,重点关注风险分担协议以及对国民健康保险预算的财务影响。

结果

在2013年至2022年期间获批的171种新药中,截至2024年1月1日,67.8%已获得报销。获批至报销的时间线因药物类型和定价途径而异,通过加权平均价格途径上市的药物比通过药物经济学评估的药物报销速度更快。2012年至2021年期间,新药占药品总支出的8.5%,肿瘤药物的单产品年度支出最高。新药支出在2019年达到峰值,但此后有所下降。

结论

虽然韩国有效控制了药品支出,但与其他主要国家相比,新药的拨款仍然较低。

相似文献

1
New drug accessibility and budgetary impact in South Korea: policy challenges and implications.韩国新药可及性与预算影响:政策挑战与启示
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Jun;25(5):813-821. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2487468. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.国家癌症新药报销目录的决定因素:对2007 - 2016年韩国58项癌症治疗评估的回顾性分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):401-409. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1276828. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
The current state of patient access to new drugs in South Korea under the positive list system: evaluation of the changes since the new review pathways.韩国积极药物清单制度下的新药患者可及性现状:新审查途径实施以来的变化评估。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Feb;21(1):119-126. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1758559. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
4
Trends in the pricing and reimbursement of new anticancer drugs in South Korea: an analysis of listed anticancer drugs during the past three years.韩国新型抗癌药物的定价和报销趋势:过去三年上市抗癌药物的分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):479-488. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860023. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Reimbursement Lag of New Drugs Under Taiwan's National Health Insurance System Compared With United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Japan, and South Korea.台湾地区全民健康保险制度中新药的补偿滞后与英国、加拿大、澳大利亚、日本和韩国的比较。
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep;13(5):916-922. doi: 10.1111/cts.12778. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
6
A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea.韩国对纳入正面清单的新化学实体药物和改良型新药的影响进行对比分析。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jul;33(7):926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.089. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
Patient Accessibility and Budget Impact of Orphan Drugs in South Korea: Long-Term and Real-World Data Analysis (2007-2019).韩国孤儿药的患者可及性和预算影响:长期真实世界数据分析(2007-2019)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):2991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092991.
8
Perceptions of risk sharing agreements in South Korea from the viewpoints of key stakeholders: a convergent parallel mixed approach.从关键利益相关者的视角看韩国风险分担协议的认知:一种收敛平行混合方法。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Feb;25(2):235-243. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2410250. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
9
The drug budget silo mentality: the French case.药品预算的孤立思维:以法国为例。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S10-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.2.x.
10
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.