• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国积极药物清单制度下的新药患者可及性现状:新审查途径实施以来的变化评估。

The current state of patient access to new drugs in South Korea under the positive list system: evaluation of the changes since the new review pathways.

机构信息

Healthcare Group, Lee&Ko , Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Market Access, AbbVie Korea , Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Feb;21(1):119-126. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1758559. Epub 2020 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2020.1758559
PMID:32308058
Abstract

: This study aims to provide an up-to-date analysis of the current state of patient access to new drugs in South Korea, focusing on the effect of new review pathways for reimbursement. : We analyzed patients' access to new drugs, listing rate and lead time until listing from marketing authorization. New pathways were defined as 'price negotiation waiver,' 'risk-sharing agreements,' and 'pharmacoeconomic evaluation exemption.' : The listing rate for drugs increased after the introduction of the new pathways (93.7% vs. 77.9%, p < 0.001). Before the new pathways, the median lead time for listing was 21.0 months (95% CI: 16.9-25.0), while afterward it was shortened to 10.9 months (95% CI: 10.2-11.7) (p < 0.001). : Although it has strengthened national health insurance coverage by positively impacting the rate and lead time, the lead time for the oncology and orphan drugs is substantially longer as compared to other drugs. Expanding the eligibility criteria to include non-life-threatening but rare or intractable diseases, and resolving the system's operational issues are still necessary.

摘要

这项研究旨在对韩国新药患者可及性的现状进行最新分析,重点关注新的报销审查途径的影响。

我们分析了新药的患者可及性、上市率和从获得上市许可到上市的时间。新途径被定义为“免除价格谈判”、“风险分担协议”和“药物经济学评价豁免”。新途径引入后,药品上市率提高(93.7%对 77.9%,p<0.001)。在新途径之前,上市的中位时间为 21.0 个月(95%CI:16.9-25.0),之后缩短至 10.9 个月(95%CI:10.2-11.7)(p<0.001)。

虽然通过积极影响上市率和上市时间来加强国家健康保险覆盖范围,但与其他药物相比,肿瘤药物和孤儿药物的上市时间要长得多。扩大资格标准,将非危及生命但罕见或难治性疾病包括在内,并解决系统的操作问题仍然是必要的。

相似文献

1
The current state of patient access to new drugs in South Korea under the positive list system: evaluation of the changes since the new review pathways.韩国积极药物清单制度下的新药患者可及性现状:新审查途径实施以来的变化评估。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Feb;21(1):119-126. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1758559. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
2
National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.国家癌症新药报销目录的决定因素:对2007 - 2016年韩国58项癌症治疗评估的回顾性分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):401-409. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1276828. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
Trends in the pricing and reimbursement of new anticancer drugs in South Korea: an analysis of listed anticancer drugs during the past three years.韩国新型抗癌药物的定价和报销趋势:过去三年上市抗癌药物的分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):479-488. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860023. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Reimbursement Lag of New Drugs Under Taiwan's National Health Insurance System Compared With United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Japan, and South Korea.台湾地区全民健康保险制度中新药的补偿滞后与英国、加拿大、澳大利亚、日本和韩国的比较。
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep;13(5):916-922. doi: 10.1111/cts.12778. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea.韩国对纳入正面清单的新化学实体药物和改良型新药的影响进行对比分析。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jul;33(7):926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.089. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
6
Effect of the copayment reduction system on accessibility to orphan drugs in South Korea.韩国共付减免制度对罕见病药物可及性的影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jun;23(5):519-525. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2192481. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Comparing patient access to pharmaceuticals in the UK and US.比较英国和美国患者获取药品的情况。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(3):177-87. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200605030-00004.
8
Temporary authorization for use: does the French patient access programme for unlicensed medicines impact market access after formal licensing?临时授权使用:法国未许可药品的患者准入计划对正式许可后的市场准入有何影响?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Apr;31(4):335-43. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0039-4.
9
Pricing and Reimbursement Pathways of New Orphan Drugs in South Korea: A Longitudinal Comparison.韩国新型孤儿药的定价与报销途径:纵向比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;9(3):296. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030296.
10
Improving Patient Access to New Drugs in South Korea: Evaluation of the National Drug Formulary System.提高韩国患者获取新药的可及性:国家药物处方集系统的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 21;16(2):288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020288.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of drug pricing drivers under South Korea's pharmaco-economic evaluation exemption policy (2015-2022).韩国药物经济学评估豁免政策(2015 - 2022年)下的药品定价驱动因素分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1519491. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1519491. eCollection 2024.
2
Research on unintroduced new drugs in South Korea from 2011 to 2020: approaches to prioritization and strategy.2011年至2020年韩国未引进新药的研究:优先排序方法与策略
Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;32(4):187-197. doi: 10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e19. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Comparative policy analysis of national rare disease funding policies in Australia, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States: a scoping review.
澳大利亚、新加坡、韩国、英国和美国国家罕见病资助政策的比较政策分析:一项范围综述
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00519-1.
4
Variables affecting new drug prices in South Korea's pricing system.韩国定价体系中影响新药价格的变量。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 9;15:1370915. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1370915. eCollection 2024.
5
An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System.韩国新药上市制度中未满足需求的行业调查
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):759-768. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00531-3. Epub 2023 May 14.
6
Cell and gene therapy regulatory, pricing, and reimbursement framework: With a focus on South Korea and the EU.细胞和基因治疗监管、定价和报销框架:以韩国和欧盟为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1109873. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109873. eCollection 2023.
7
Pricing and Reimbursement Pathways of New Orphan Drugs in South Korea: A Longitudinal Comparison.韩国新型孤儿药的定价与报销途径:纵向比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;9(3):296. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030296.
8
Price-Cutting Trends in New Drugs after Listing in South Korea: The Effect of the Reimbursement Review Pathway on Price Reduction.韩国新药上市后的降价趋势:报销审查途径对降价的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jul 26;8(3):233. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030233.