• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们识别人工智能驱动的语音克隆的能力很差。

People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clones.

作者信息

Barrington Sarah, Cooper Emily A, Farid Hany

机构信息

School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94170-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-94170-3
PMID:40164656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11958761/
Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) continues its ballistic trajectory, everything from text to audio, image, and video generation continues to improve at mimicking human-generated content. Through a series of perceptual studies, we report on the realism of AI-generated voices in terms of identity matching and naturalness. We find human participants cannot consistently identify recordings of AI-generated voices. Specifically, participants perceived the identity of an AI-generated voice to be the same as its real counterpart approximately [Formula: see text] of the time, and correctly identified a voice as AI generated only about [Formula: see text] of the time.

摘要

随着生成式人工智能(AI)继续其迅猛发展的轨迹,从文本到音频、图像和视频生成的各个方面在模仿人类生成的内容方面都在不断改进。通过一系列感知研究,我们报告了人工智能生成语音在身份匹配和自然度方面的逼真程度。我们发现人类参与者无法始终如一地识别人工智能生成语音的录音。具体而言,参与者大约有[公式:见原文]的时间认为人工智能生成语音的身份与其真实对应语音相同,而正确识别出某语音是由人工智能生成的概率仅约为[公式:见原文]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387a/11958761/0c53ce9f1ead/41598_2025_94170_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387a/11958761/324931af8a26/41598_2025_94170_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387a/11958761/12b67a1c2bea/41598_2025_94170_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387a/11958761/0c53ce9f1ead/41598_2025_94170_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387a/11958761/324931af8a26/41598_2025_94170_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387a/11958761/12b67a1c2bea/41598_2025_94170_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387a/11958761/0c53ce9f1ead/41598_2025_94170_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clones.人们识别人工智能驱动的语音克隆的能力很差。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94170-3.
2
Using Natural Language Processing to Explore Patient Perspectives on AI Avatars in Support Materials for Patients With Breast Cancer: Survey Study.使用自然语言处理技术探索乳腺癌患者在支持材料中对人工智能化身的看法:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e70971. doi: 10.2196/70971.
3
Effects of generative artificial intelligence on cognitive effort and task performance: study protocol for a randomized controlled experiment among college students.生成式人工智能对认知努力和任务表现的影响:一项针对大学生的随机对照实验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Jul 11;26(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08950-3.
4
Figure plagiarism and manipulation, an under-recognised problem in academia.图像抄袭与篡改,学术界一个未得到充分认识的问题。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug;35(8):4518-4521. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11426-2. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
5
Safety and User Experience of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Digital Mental Health Intervention: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.生成式人工智能数字心理健康干预的安全性与用户体验:探索性随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e67365. doi: 10.2196/67365.
6
Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.人工智能在圆锥角膜检测中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD014911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014911.pub2.
7
Co-Design of a Health Screening Program Fact Sheet by People Experiencing Homelessness and ChatGPT: Focus Group Study.无家可归者与ChatGPT共同设计健康筛查项目情况说明书:焦点小组研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 4;9:e68316. doi: 10.2196/68316.
8
Evaluating the Usability of an HIV Prevention Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in Malaysia: National Observational Study.评估马来西亚一款预防艾滋病人工智能聊天机器人的可用性:全国性观察研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 15;12:e70034. doi: 10.2196/70034.
9
Do you like my voice? Stakeholder perspectives about the acceptability of synthetic child voices in three South African languages.你喜欢我的声音吗?利益相关者对三种南非语言中合成儿童声音可接受性的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13152. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13152.
10
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitigating the harms of manipulated media: Confronting deepfakes and digital deception.减轻被操纵媒体的危害:应对深度伪造和数字欺骗。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jul 29;4(7):pgaf194. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf194. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video.跨转录本、音频和视频检测政治演讲深度伪造。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 2;15(1):7629. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z.
2
Warning: Humans cannot reliably detect speech deepfakes.警告:人类无法可靠地识别语音深度伪造。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0285333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285333. eCollection 2023.
3
AI-synthesized faces are indistinguishable from real faces and more trustworthy.人工智能合成的人脸与真实人脸难以区分,并且更值得信任。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120481119.
4
Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds.基于人类群体、机器和机器辅助的人类群体的深度伪造检测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110013119.
5
Fooled twice: People cannot detect deepfakes but think they can.被愚弄两次:人们无法察觉深度伪造,但却认为自己能做到。
iScience. 2021 Oct 29;24(11):103364. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103364. eCollection 2021 Nov 19.
6
Perception and motivation in face recognition: a critical review of theories of the Cross-Race Effect.面孔识别中的知觉和动机:跨种族效应理论的批判性回顾。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 May;16(2):116-42. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418987. Epub 2011 Aug 30.