• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警告:人类无法可靠地识别语音深度伪造。

Warning: Humans cannot reliably detect speech deepfakes.

机构信息

Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0285333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285333. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0285333
PMID:37531336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10395974/
Abstract

Speech deepfakes are artificial voices generated by machine learning models. Previous literature has highlighted deepfakes as one of the biggest security threats arising from progress in artificial intelligence due to their potential for misuse. However, studies investigating human detection capabilities are limited. We presented genuine and deepfake audio to n = 529 individuals and asked them to identify the deepfakes. We ran our experiments in English and Mandarin to understand if language affects detection performance and decision-making rationale. We found that detection capability is unreliable. Listeners only correctly spotted the deepfakes 73% of the time, and there was no difference in detectability between the two languages. Increasing listener awareness by providing examples of speech deepfakes only improves results slightly. As speech synthesis algorithms improve and become more realistic, we can expect the detection task to become harder. The difficulty of detecting speech deepfakes confirms their potential for misuse and signals that defenses against this threat are needed.

摘要

语音深度伪造是由机器学习模型生成的人工语音。之前的文献强调,由于其潜在的滥用风险,深度伪造是人工智能进步带来的最大安全威胁之一。然而,研究人员对人类检测能力的研究还很有限。我们向 n=529 人展示了真实的和深度伪造的音频,并要求他们识别深度伪造的音频。我们在英语和普通话中进行了实验,以了解语言是否会影响检测性能和决策依据。我们发现,检测能力是不可靠的。听众只能在 73%的情况下正确识别出深度伪造的音频,而且两种语言的可检测性没有差异。通过提供语音深度伪造的示例来提高听众的意识,只能略微提高结果。随着语音合成算法的改进和变得更加逼真,我们可以预期检测任务会变得更加困难。检测语音深度伪造的难度证实了它们潜在的滥用风险,并表明需要针对这种威胁采取防御措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/dbd7dae6585b/pone.0285333.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/4df4eca29d26/pone.0285333.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/c9cdddb9acd9/pone.0285333.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/51c3e763f4e4/pone.0285333.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/7d4f624802bd/pone.0285333.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/f65cc31fcbb0/pone.0285333.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/7582cbc9a516/pone.0285333.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/3dad88f7a077/pone.0285333.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/8588c991d35f/pone.0285333.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/a3c1b2ec6032/pone.0285333.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/dbd7dae6585b/pone.0285333.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/4df4eca29d26/pone.0285333.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/c9cdddb9acd9/pone.0285333.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/51c3e763f4e4/pone.0285333.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/7d4f624802bd/pone.0285333.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/f65cc31fcbb0/pone.0285333.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/7582cbc9a516/pone.0285333.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/3dad88f7a077/pone.0285333.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/8588c991d35f/pone.0285333.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/a3c1b2ec6032/pone.0285333.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb26/10395974/dbd7dae6585b/pone.0285333.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Warning: Humans cannot reliably detect speech deepfakes.警告:人类无法可靠地识别语音深度伪造。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0285333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285333. eCollection 2023.
2
A Review of Image Processing Techniques for Deepfakes.深度伪造的图像处理技术综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;22(12):4556. doi: 10.3390/s22124556.
3
Audio deepfakes: A survey.音频深度伪造:一项调查。
Front Big Data. 2023 Jan 9;5:1001063. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.1001063. eCollection 2022.
4
Deepfakes as a threat to a speaker and facial recognition: An overview of tools and attack vectors.深度伪造对说话者和面部识别的威胁:工具与攻击途径概述
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 3;9(4):e15090. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15090. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.母语和非母语听者在英语语音感知中因噪声、混响和说话者外国口音而产生的听力努力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 15;62(4):1068-1081. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0423.
6
Investigation of Deepfake Voice Detection Using Speech Pause Patterns: Algorithm Development and Validation.基于语音停顿模式的深度伪造语音检测研究:算法开发与验证
JMIR Biomed Eng. 2024 Mar 21;9:e56245. doi: 10.2196/56245.
7
Fooled twice: People cannot detect deepfakes but think they can.被愚弄两次:人们无法察觉深度伪造,但却认为自己能做到。
iScience. 2021 Oct 29;24(11):103364. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103364. eCollection 2021 Nov 19.
8
Prediction of self-efficacy in recognizing deepfakes based on personality traits .基于人格特质预测对深度伪造的自我效能感。
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 12;11:1529. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.128915.3. eCollection 2022.
9
Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video.跨转录本、音频和视频检测政治演讲深度伪造。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 2;15(1):7629. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z.
10
Comparative Analysis of Deepfake Image Detection Method Using Convolutional Neural Network.基于卷积神经网络的深度伪造图像检测方法的比较分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Dec 16;2021:3111676. doi: 10.1155/2021/3111676. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Labeling AI-generated media online.对在线人工智能生成的媒体进行标注。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 May 28;4(6):pgaf170. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf170. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Audio Deepfake Detection: What Has Been Achieved and What Lies Ahead.音频深度伪造检测:已取得的成果与未来展望。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;25(7):1989. doi: 10.3390/s25071989.
3
People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clones.人们识别人工智能驱动的语音克隆的能力很差。

本文引用的文献

1
AI-synthesized faces are indistinguishable from real faces and more trustworthy.人工智能合成的人脸与真实人脸难以区分,并且更值得信任。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120481119.
2
Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds.基于人类群体、机器和机器辅助的人类群体的深度伪造检测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110013119.
3
Fooled twice: People cannot detect deepfakes but think they can.被愚弄两次:人们无法察觉深度伪造,但却认为自己能做到。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94170-3.
4
Impaired Prosodic Processing but Not Hearing Function Is Associated with an Age-Related Reduction in AI Speech Recognition.韵律加工受损而非听力功能与年龄相关的人工耳蜗语音识别能力下降有关。
Audiol Res. 2025 Feb 8;15(1):14. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010014.
5
Assessing the Current Limitations of Large Language Models in Advancing Health Care Education.评估大语言模型在推进医疗保健教育方面的当前局限性。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 16;9:e51319. doi: 10.2196/51319.
6
Investigation of Deepfake Voice Detection Using Speech Pause Patterns: Algorithm Development and Validation.基于语音停顿模式的深度伪造语音检测研究:算法开发与验证
JMIR Biomed Eng. 2024 Mar 21;9:e56245. doi: 10.2196/56245.
7
Cortical-striatal brain network distinguishes deepfake from real speaker identity.皮质纹状体脑网络可区分深度伪造与真实说话人身份。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jun 11;7(1):711. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06372-6.
8
Multimodal analysis of disinformation and misinformation.虚假信息与错误信息的多模态分析
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Dec 20;10(12):230964. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230964. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Perception and deception: Exploring individual responses to deepfakes across different modalities.感知与欺骗:探究个体对不同模态下深度伪造技术的反应。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 21;9(10):e20383. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20383. eCollection 2023 Oct.
iScience. 2021 Oct 29;24(11):103364. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103364. eCollection 2021 Nov 19.
4
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.