• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉大五人格量表-2:全面的心理测量学验证

The Bangla Big Five Inventory-2: a comprehensive psychometric validation.

作者信息

Siraji Mushfiqul Anwar, Karim Fahria, Soto Christopher J, Haque Shamsul

机构信息

Department of History and Philosophy, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Department of Psychology, Colby College, Waterville, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90264-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-90264-0
PMID:40164706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11958739/
Abstract

The Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) is a widely recognized tool for assessing personality traits across five domains and fifteen facets. However, its psychometric properties in non-Western cultures like Bangladesh remain unexplored. This study aimed to validate the Bangla BFI-2 (BFI-2-B) within a Bangladeshi community sample to provide a culturally adapted personality assessment tool. A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 1,095 participants, where 646 participants (59%; 358 female; Age = 24.25 years, SD = 4.47) passed all attention checks. Participants responded to a demographic questionnaire, Bangla Big Five-2 (BFI-2-B), and Bangla NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI). The domain-level structural validity was analyzed using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). A series of five different latent models were tested by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for facet-level structural validity. Full Measurement invariance across gender, education level, and language were tested. The item quality was assessed using Item Response Theory analysis (IRT). Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlating the BFI-2-B domains with the NEO-FFI. The BFI-2-B demonstrated high internal consistency across domains (> 0.70) and facets (> 0.60; except energy level, intellectual curiosity, and respectfulness). ESEM confirmed structural validity at the domain level (CFI & TLI = 0.96). CFA analysis revealed that at the facet level, a three-facet structure with an acquiescence factor yielded the most acceptable fit (CFI& TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08). Full measurement invariance was established across gender and educational levels, but only weak invariance was found across languages, indicating linguistic challenges. The similar domains of BFI-2-B and NEO-FFI had strong correlations (r ≥ 0.59), and distinct domains exhibited low correlations, indicating strong convergent and discriminant validity. IRT analysis showed that most items had high to moderate discrimination. The BFI-2-B is a reliable and valid tool for assessing personality in the Bangladeshi context, with robust psychometric properties across domains and most facets. Addressing linguistic nuances and testing in more diverse samples can further enhance its cross-cultural applicability.The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 24/09/24. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7DTQG.

摘要

大五人格量表第二版(BFI-2)是一种广泛认可的用于评估五个领域和十五个方面人格特质的工具。然而,其在孟加拉国等非西方文化中的心理测量特性仍未得到探索。本研究旨在在孟加拉国社区样本中验证孟加拉语版BFI-2(BFI-2-B),以提供一种经过文化调适的人格评估工具。对1095名参与者进行了横断面调查,其中646名参与者(59%;358名女性;年龄=24.25岁,标准差=4.47)通过了所有注意力检查。参与者回答了一份人口统计学问卷、孟加拉语大五人格量表第二版(BFI-2-B)和孟加拉语新版大五人格量表(NEO FFI)。使用探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)分析领域层面的结构效度。通过验证性因素分析(CFA)测试了一系列五个不同的潜在模型,以评估方面层面的结构效度。测试了性别、教育水平和语言之间的完全测量不变性。使用项目反应理论分析(IRT)评估项目质量。通过将BFI-2-B领域与NEO-FFI进行相关性分析来评估聚合效度和区分效度。BFI-2-B在各个领域(>0.70)和方面(>0.60;能量水平、求知欲和尊重除外)表现出较高的内部一致性。ESEM证实了领域层面的结构效度(CFI&TLI=0.96)。CFA分析表明,在方面层面,具有默认因素的三方面结构产生了最可接受的拟合度(CFI&TLI≥0.95;RMSEA≤≤0.06;SRMR≤≤0.08)。在性别和教育水平上建立了完全测量不变性,但在语言之间仅发现了弱不变性,表明存在语言挑战。BFI-2-B和NEO-FFI的相似领域具有很强的相关性(r≥≥0.5),不同领域的相关性较低,表明具有很强的聚合效度和区分效度。IRT分析表明,大多数项目具有高到中等的区分度。BFI-2-B是一种在孟加拉国背景下评估人格的可靠且有效的工具,在各个领域和大多数方面都具有稳健的心理测量特性。解决语言细微差别并在更多样化的样本中进行测试可以进一步提高其跨文化适用性。本注册报告的第一阶段方案于2024年9月24日原则上获得接受。该方案已被该期刊接受,可在以下网址查阅:10.17605/OSF.IO/7DTQG。

相似文献

1
The Bangla Big Five Inventory-2: a comprehensive psychometric validation.孟加拉大五人格量表-2:全面的心理测量学验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90264-0.
2
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Factor structure and psychometric properties of the French versions of the Big Five Inventory-2 Short (BFI-2-S) and Extra-Short (BFI-2-XS) Forms.大五人格量表-2简版(BFI-2-S)和超简版(BFI-2-XS)法语版本的因子结构和心理测量特性。
Encephale. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2024.12.002.
5
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
[Is personality assessment with the French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr) invariant according to gender and activity of the respondents?].[使用法国大五人格量表(BFI-Fr)进行的人格评估是否因受访者的性别和活动而具有不变性?]
Encephale. 2022 Feb;48(1):52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence From the Russian Version.大五人格量表 2 的测量不变性和性别与年龄差异:来自俄罗斯语版的证据。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):472-486. doi: 10.1177/1073191119860901. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Psychometric validation of revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (OBVQ-R) among adolescents in Bangladesh.修订版 Olweus 欺负/受欺负问卷(OBVQ-R)在孟加拉国青少年中的心理测量学验证。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 May;83:103514. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103514. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
9
A validation of the Japanese adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.《大五人格量表-2》日本版的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:924351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924351. eCollection 2022.
10
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.

本文引用的文献

1
A validation of the Japanese adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.《大五人格量表-2》日本版的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:924351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924351. eCollection 2022.
2
The Big Five Inventory-2 in China: A Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation in Four Diverse Samples.中国的大五人格量表-2:在四个不同样本中的综合心理测量学评估
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1262-1284. doi: 10.1177/10731911211008245. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence From the Russian Version.
大五人格量表 2 的测量不变性和性别与年龄差异:来自俄罗斯语版的证据。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):472-486. doi: 10.1177/1073191119860901. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence.外向型人格在工作中的优势:元分析证据的定量综述与综合。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Dec;104(12):1447-1470. doi: 10.1037/apl0000415. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project.人格特质与重要生活结果之间的联系有多大程度的可复制性?人格特质复制项目的生活结果。
Psychol Sci. 2019 May;30(5):711-727. doi: 10.1177/0956797619831612. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
6
The Big Five Inventory-2: Replication of Psychometric Properties in a Dutch Adaptation and First Evidence for the Discriminant Predictive Validity of the Facet Scales [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text].大五人格量表-2:荷兰语适应版的心理测量特性复制及特质量表鉴别预测效度的初步证据 [公式:见正文] [公式:见正文] [公式:见正文]。
J Pers Assess. 2020 May-Jun;102(3):309-324. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1539004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
7
An Illustration of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Framework on the Passion Scale.探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)框架在激情量表上的一个示例。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 7;8:1968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01968. eCollection 2017.
8
Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis.人格特质能否预测健康与幸福?一项综合分析。
Health Psychol. 2017 Aug;36(8):797-810. doi: 10.1037/hea0000475. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
9
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes.人格的力量:人格特质、社会经济地位和认知能力在预测重要人生结果方面的比较效度
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.