• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种结合三种技术的成人包茎环切新技术:一项回顾性比较研究

A novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis combining three techniques: a retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Wang Dong, Li Yingjie, Zhang Xuebin, Yan Su, Zhang Yushi

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01057-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41443-025-01057-y
PMID:40164815
Abstract

We presented a novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis that combines the advantages of three circumcision methods-dorsal slit, guillotine, and sleeve (DGS)-while modifying technical details, referred to as the modified DGS technique. This retrospective comparative trial enrolled 483 adult males with phimosis undergoing circumcision between March 1, 2018 and March 1, 2024 at our hospital. The patients were divided into the modified DGS technique group (n = 151) and control (dorsal slit technique) group (n = 332) according to their preferences. Postoperative complications, surgical duration, and satisfaction with penile appearance were compared. The overall complication rate was 2.6% in the modified DGS group and 11.1% in the control group (p = 0.0019). The mean surgical duration was 36.8 ± 11.5 min for the modified DGS group and 35.2 ± 8.9 min for the control group (p = 0.0964). The modified DGS group exhibited a significantly lower dissatisfaction rate regarding overall penile appearance compared to the control group (2.6% versus 18.1%, p < 0.0001) as assessed by the postoperative follow-up questionnaire. The modified DGS technique, compared with the dorsal slit approach, can be used for phimosis with a similar surgical duration. It demonstrates fewer complications and better cosmetic outcomes.

摘要

我们提出了一种针对成人包茎的新型包皮环切术,该技术结合了三种包皮环切术(背侧切开术、断头术和袖套状环切术,即DGS)的优点,同时对技术细节进行了改进,称为改良DGS技术。这项回顾性比较试验纳入了2018年3月1日至2024年3月1日在我院接受包皮环切术的483例成年包茎男性患者。根据患者的意愿,将其分为改良DGS技术组(n = 151)和对照组(背侧切开术组,n = 332)。比较了术后并发症、手术时长以及对阴茎外观的满意度。改良DGS组的总体并发症发生率为2.6%,对照组为11.1%(p = 0.0019)。改良DGS组的平均手术时长为36.8±11.5分钟,对照组为35.2±8.9分钟(p = 0.0964)。根据术后随访问卷评估,改良DGS组对阴茎整体外观的不满意率显著低于对照组(2.6%对18.1%,p < 0.0001)。与背侧切开术相比,改良DGS技术可用于治疗包茎,手术时长相似。它并发症更少,美容效果更好。

相似文献

1
A novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis combining three techniques: a retrospective comparative study.一种结合三种技术的成人包茎环切新技术:一项回顾性比较研究
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01057-y.
2
[Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].商环包皮环切术、袖套状包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术治疗包皮过长及包茎:918例对比研究
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2013 Apr;19(4):332-6.
3
The dartocavernous stitch surgical technique for prevention of recurrent phimosis in obese patients presenting for circumcision.用于预防肥胖患者包皮环切术后复发性包茎的肉膜海绵体缝合手术技术。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):176-180. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-540. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
4
Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.一种新型一次性缝合装置在包皮环切术中的应用:一项前瞻性非随机对照研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Apr;48(4):465-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1213-3. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
5
Utilization of subcutaneous indwelling 2-0 silk thread for inner plate frenulum alignment in circumcision using a disposable circumcision suture device: A modified surgical technique.使用一次性包皮环切缝合器行包皮环切术时皮下留置2-0丝线用于内板系带对齐:一种改良手术技术
Surgery. 2025 Feb;178:108970. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.108970. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
6
Subcutaneous tissue-sparing dorsal slit with new marking technique: A novel circumcision method.采用新标记技术的保留皮下组织背侧切开术:一种新型包皮环切术方法。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15322. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015322.
7
[Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce].包皮环切吻合器治疗包茎及包皮过长的临床疗效
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2015 Apr;21(4):330-3.
8
[Phimosis: dorsal slit or circumcision?].[包茎:背侧切开还是包皮环切术?]
Cir Pediatr. 2011 Jan;24(1):51-4.
9
Alisklamp versus Conventional Dorsal Slit Circumcision: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial.阿利斯克兰普环切术与传统背侧切开包皮环切术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 5;13(15):4568. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154568.
10
Comparative analysis on the outcomes in circumcising children using modified Chinese ShangRing and conventional surgical circumcision.采用改良中式商环与传统手术环切术对儿童进行包皮环切术的疗效比较分析
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec 23;39(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05343-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to Comment on: A novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis combining three techniques: a retrospective comparative study.对《一种结合三种技术的成人包茎新型包皮环切术:一项回顾性比较研究》评论的回应
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01077-8.
2
Comment On: A novel circumcision technique for adult phimosis combining three techniques: a retrospective comparative study.评论:一种结合三种技术的成人包茎环切新技术:一项回顾性比较研究。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01066-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Alisklamp versus Conventional Dorsal Slit Circumcision: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial.阿利斯克兰普环切术与传统背侧切开包皮环切术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 5;13(15):4568. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154568.
2
The impact of male genital self-image on depression, anxiety and sexual functions.男性生殖器自我意象对抑郁、焦虑和性功能的影响。
Aging Male. 2024 Dec;27(1):2363275. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2024.2363275. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
Factors influencing satisfaction with male circumcision in Taiwan.影响台湾男性割礼满意度的因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20140-8.
4
Happiness with Circumcision Status, Not Status Itself, Predicts Genital Self-Image in a Geographically Diverse Sample.割礼状况而非状况本身与地理位置多样化样本中的生殖器自我意象相关。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1525-1534. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02543-4. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Preputioplasty as a surgical alternative in treatment of phimosis.包皮成形术作为治疗包茎的一种手术选择。
Int J Impot Res. 2022 May;34(4):353-358. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00505-9. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
6
Cosmetic results of circumcision and scar wrinkling: Do we exaggerate in terms of hemostasis and sutures?包皮环切术的美容效果与瘢痕皱缩:我们在止血和缝合方面是否夸大其词了?
Urologia. 2022 Feb;89(1):108-113. doi: 10.1177/0391560320911526. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Male Circumcision Due to Phimosis as the Procedure That Is Not Only Relieving Clinical Symptoms of Phimosis But Also Improves the Quality of Sexual Life.因包茎行包皮环切术不仅可缓解包茎的临床症状,还能提高性生活质量。
Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100315. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100315. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
Prevalence of Phimosis in Males of All Ages: Systematic Review.各年龄段男性包茎的患病率:系统评价。
Urology. 2020 Jan;135:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology.泌尿外科临床研究统计学报告的指南。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
A prospective cohort study of safety and patient satisfaction of voluntary medical male circumcision in Botswana.博茨瓦纳自愿男性包皮环切术安全性和患者满意度的前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 7;12(11):e0185904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185904. eCollection 2017.