• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

突破界限:体重指数(BMI)≥35与BMI<35的患者接受机器人经脐单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(eTEP)后并发症和复发的发生率

Pushing the boundary: the incidence of complications and recurrences following robotic eTEP in BMI ≥ 35 versus BMI < 35 patients.

作者信息

Liu Yao, Gabinet Nicholas, Ortega-Goddard Emily, Luhrs Andrew, Giorgi Marcoandrea

机构信息

Brown University Health Comprehensive Hernia Center, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3373-3376. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11669-6. Epub 2025 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11669-6
PMID:40164837
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obesity not only contributes to the pathology of primary and incisional ventral hernias but is also associated with increased rates of post-operative complications and hernia recurrence after repair. Whether this holds true for complex robotic eTEP retrorectus hernia repair has not been well researched. The aim of this study was to determine whether obesity increases risks of short-term recurrence or complications after robotic abdominal wall reconstruction.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective chart review was performed for 102 robotic eTEP abdominal wall reconstructions completed at a single institution between 2019 and 2022. Independent variables included patient demographics, hernia characteristics, and intraoperative data. Primary outcomes included 30-day post-operative complications resulting in readmission/ED visits. Outcomes were compared between two cohorts: BMI < 35 and BMI ≥ 35. Univariate analysis was used to compare the incidence of complications between both groups.

RESULTS

Our mean follow-up time was 59.2 +/- 98.7 days, and median was 18 days, with the range of 6-419 days. Of the 102 patients, the overall mean BMI was 32.1. 31 patients (30%) had a BMI ≥ 35, while 71 (70%) had a BMI < 35. The BMI ≥ 35 cohort had a mean BMI of 37.9, and the BMI < 35 cohort had a BMI of 29.6. There were no recurrences in the BMI ≥ 35 group and only one in the BMI < 35 group (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.51, 95% CI - 0.06 to 0.03). There were two complications in the BMI ≥ 35 group, and seven in the BMI < 35 group (6.5% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.58, 95% CI - 0.17 to 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our single-center experience showed no significant increase in 30-day hernia recurrence or surgical site occurrences for patients with BMI ≥ 35 undergoing robotic eTEP. This study is limited by small patient cohort size and short follow-up interval.

摘要

引言

肥胖不仅会导致原发性和切口性腹疝的病理改变,还与术后并发症发生率增加以及修补术后疝复发有关。对于复杂的机器人经腹膜外后直肌疝修补术而言,情况是否如此尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是确定肥胖是否会增加机器人腹壁重建术后短期复发或并发症的风险。

方法

对2019年至2022年在单一机构完成的102例机器人经腹膜外腹壁重建手术进行回顾性病历审查。自变量包括患者人口统计学特征、疝的特征和术中数据。主要结局包括导致再次入院/急诊就诊的术后30天并发症。对两个队列进行结局比较:BMI<35和BMI≥35。采用单因素分析比较两组并发症的发生率。

结果

我们的平均随访时间为59.2±98.7天,中位数为18天,范围为6-419天。102例患者的总体平均BMI为32.1。31例患者(30%)的BMI≥35,而71例(70%)的BMI<35。BMI≥35队列的平均BMI为37.9,BMI<35队列的BMI为29.6。BMI≥35组无复发,BMI<35组仅有1例复发(0%对1.4%,p=0.51,95%CI -0.06至0.03)。BMI≥35组有2例并发症,BMI<35组有7例并发症(6.5%对9.9%,p=0.58,95%CI -0.17至0.11)。

结论

我们单中心的经验结果显示,接受机器人经腹膜外手术的BMI≥35患者在术后30天的疝复发或手术部位并发症方面没有显著增加。本研究受患者队列规模小和随访间隔短的限制。

相似文献

1
Pushing the boundary: the incidence of complications and recurrences following robotic eTEP in BMI ≥ 35 versus BMI < 35 patients.突破界限:体重指数(BMI)≥35与BMI<35的患者接受机器人经脐单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(eTEP)后并发症和复发的发生率
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3373-3376. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11669-6. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
A retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic enhanced view totally extra-peritoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair of incisional ventral hernias in patients with morbid obesity.一项针对病态肥胖患者腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa(eTEP-RS)修补切口疝的回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):2099-2107. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11565-z. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair.内镜(经脐单孔腹腔镜入路)机器人辅助肌后腹壁疝修补术的早期手术结果
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):837-847. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1795-z. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
4
Comparing procedural costs and early clinical outcomes of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for midline ventral hernias.比较机器人辅助完全腹膜外(eTEP)与腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中线腹疝的手术成本和早期临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11319-3. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
5
Robotic retromuscular hernia repair optimizes short-term outcomes in higher risk patients.机器人辅助肌后疝修补术可优化高风险患者的短期治疗效果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2828-2835. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11630-7. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
6
Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs.腹腔镜和机器人增强视野完全腹膜外(eTEP)入路经直肠后修补术的疗效比较回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3597-3605. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07132-y. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Active smoking increases risk of wound complications in robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) retro-rectus ventral hernia repairs.主动吸烟会增加机器人增强视野完全腹膜外(eTEP)腹直肌后鞘腹疝修补术中伤口并发症的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7596-7603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11251-6. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
8
Robotic assisted eTEP ventral hernia repair: Brazilian early experience.机器人辅助 eTEP 腹疝修补术:巴西的早期经验。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):765-774. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02233-3. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Long term outcomes of robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction: a single surgeon experience.机器人辅助腹壁重建的长期结果:单外科医生经验。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):645-656. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02774-3. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
10
Comparative approach for abdominal wall reconstruction after ventral hernia: open versus minimally invasive surgery.腹疝修补术后腹壁重建的比较方法:开放手术与微创手术
Hernia. 2025 Jan 20;29(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03264-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparisons of 30-day outcomes after ventral hernia repair by body mass index and surgical approach: a retrospective cohort study.根据体重指数和手术方式对腹疝修补术后30天结局的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):632-638. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11379-5. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
2
Tipping the scale in abdominal wall reconstruction: An analysis of short- and long-term outcomes by body mass index.在腹壁重建中权衡利弊:按体重指数分析短期和长期结果。
Surgery. 2024 Mar;175(3):806-812. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.031. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
Modifiable comorbidities impact on ventral hernia recurrence following robotic abdominal wall reconstruction using resorbable biosynthetic mesh: 36-month follow-up.
可改变的合并症对使用可吸收生物合成补片的机器人腹壁重建术后腹疝复发的影响:36个月随访
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jul 20;14:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.012. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in patients with obesity: should we be scared of body mass index?肥胖患者的腹腔镜下腹膜疝修补术:我们是否应该害怕体重指数?
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2032-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08489-9. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Use of morphometric assessment of body composition to quantify risk of surgical-site infection in patients undergoing component separation ventral hernia repair.使用人体成分的形态计量评估来量化接受腹部分离术的患者发生手术部位感染的风险。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Apr;133(4):559e-566e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000009.
6
Complications of laparoscopic incisional-ventral hernia repair: the experience of a single institution.腹腔镜切口疝修补术的并发症:单机构经验
Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):672-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8506-1. Epub 2004 Mar 19.