• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女计划生育满意度的地理模式及影响因素

Geographic patterns and determinants of family planning satisfaction among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia.

作者信息

Kebede Natnael, Anteneh Rahel Mulatie, Moges Natnael, Tsega Sintayehu Simie, Zemene Melkamu Aderajew, Gebeyehu Asaye Alamneh, Belete Melaku Ashagrie, Anley Denekew Tenaw, Alemayehu Ermiyas, Chanie Ermias Sisay, Dessie Anteneh Mengist

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.

Department of Public Health, College of Health Science, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 Mar 31;10(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00356-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40834-025-00356-5
PMID:40165280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11956413/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While studies in Ethiopia have explored family planning use and contraceptive determinants, limited research examines the spatial variation and predictors of satisfaction with family planning methods. This study addresses this gap using geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis to assess spatial patterns and determinants of satisfaction with family planning methods among reproductive-age women. Utilizing nationally representative 2021 Performance Monitoring for Action Ethiopia (PMA-ET) data, the study aims to provide targeted insights for improving family planning services.

METHODS

A weighted sample of 1,456 reproductive-age women was analyzed. Spatial analysis was conducted using ArcGIS 10.7 and SaTScan 9.6. Hotspot detection, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, and geographically weighted regression (GWR) were applied. The Bernoulli model was used to identify spatial clusters of satisfaction. Associations between satisfaction and explanatory variables were assessed using OLS and GWR, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The overall satisfaction rate with current family planning methods was 84.1% (95% CI: 82.12, 85.97). Satisfaction levels exhibited a clustered spatial distribution. High-satisfaction hotspots were detected in Addis Ababa, most parts of Amhara, and some areas of Benishangul-Gumuz. SaTScan identified a primary spatial cluster (RR = 1.19, P < 0.001) in Addis Ababa, northern southwestern Ethiopia, and eastern Gambela, and a secondary cluster (RR = 1.18, P < 0.001) in northern Addis Ababa and southern Amhara. GWR analysis revealed that younger women (15-24 years), those with poor wealth status, and urban residents were significant spatial predictors of satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed that satisfaction with the current use of family planning methods among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia exhibits regional variations. Statistically significant clusters of higher satisfaction were identified in Addis Ababa, most parts of Amhara, and some parts of Benishangul-Gumuz. Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) analysis indicated that women aged 15-24, those with poor wealth status, and urban residents were significant spatial predictors of satisfaction at the local level. These findings suggest the need for targeted regional strategies to improve satisfaction with family planning services. Interventions should prioritize high-satisfaction areas to sustain progress while addressing disparities in underserved regions. Policymakers should focus on enhancing equitable access, strengthening awareness campaigns, and mitigating socioeconomic barriers to improve satisfaction with family planning.

摘要

引言

虽然埃塞俄比亚的研究探讨了计划生育的使用情况和避孕决定因素,但对计划生育方法满意度的空间差异和预测因素的研究有限。本研究利用地理加权回归(GWR)分析来填补这一空白,以评估育龄妇女对计划生育方法满意度的空间模式和决定因素。该研究利用具有全国代表性的2021年埃塞俄比亚行动绩效监测(PMA-ET)数据,旨在为改善计划生育服务提供有针对性的见解。

方法

对1456名育龄妇女的加权样本进行了分析。使用ArcGIS 10.7和SaTScan 9.6进行空间分析。应用了热点检测、普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归和地理加权回归(GWR)。使用伯努利模型来识别满意度的空间聚类。使用OLS和GWR评估满意度与解释变量之间的关联,统计学显著性设定为P < 0.05。

结果

目前对计划生育方法的总体满意度为84.1%(95%置信区间:82.12, 85.97)。满意度水平呈现出聚类的空间分布。在亚的斯亚贝巴、阿姆哈拉的大部分地区以及贝尼尚古尔-古穆兹的一些地区检测到高满意度热点。SaTScan在埃塞俄比亚西南部北部的亚的斯亚贝巴和甘贝拉东部确定了一个主要空间聚类(相对风险RR = 1.19,P < 0.001),在亚的斯亚贝巴北部和阿姆哈拉南部确定了一个次要聚类(RR = 1.18,P < 0.001)。GWR分析显示,年轻女性(15 - 24岁)、财富状况较差的女性和城市居民是满意度的重要空间预测因素。

结论

该研究表明,埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女对当前计划生育方法的满意度存在地区差异。在亚的斯亚贝巴、阿姆哈拉的大部分地区以及贝尼尚古尔-古穆兹的一些地区确定了具有统计学显著性的较高满意度聚类。地理加权回归(GWR)分析表明,15 - 24岁的女性、财富状况较差的女性和城市居民是地方层面满意度的重要空间预测因素。这些发现表明需要有针对性的区域战略来提高对计划生育服务的满意度。干预措施应优先考虑高满意度地区以维持进展,同时解决服务不足地区的差距。政策制定者应专注于加强公平获取、强化宣传活动以及减轻社会经济障碍,以提高对计划生育的满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/f11a1864611c/40834_2025_356_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/1b3ec00c40fa/40834_2025_356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/80f34d49475c/40834_2025_356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/3607950655b6/40834_2025_356_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/af92e92a9828/40834_2025_356_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/438460c9395d/40834_2025_356_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/2337bb7960ae/40834_2025_356_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/894a0202a5d5/40834_2025_356_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/472560bab0e3/40834_2025_356_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/f11a1864611c/40834_2025_356_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/1b3ec00c40fa/40834_2025_356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/80f34d49475c/40834_2025_356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/3607950655b6/40834_2025_356_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/af92e92a9828/40834_2025_356_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/438460c9395d/40834_2025_356_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/2337bb7960ae/40834_2025_356_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/894a0202a5d5/40834_2025_356_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/472560bab0e3/40834_2025_356_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1244/11956413/f11a1864611c/40834_2025_356_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Geographic patterns and determinants of family planning satisfaction among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女计划生育满意度的地理模式及影响因素
Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 Mar 31;10(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00356-5.
2
Mapping and predicting open defecation in Ethiopia: 2021 PMA-ET study.埃塞俄比亚露天排便的绘制和预测:2021 年 PMA-ET 研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 23;24(1):1671. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19222-1.
3
Spatial variations and predictors of overweight/obesity among under-five children in Ethiopia: A geographically weighted regression analysis of the 2019 Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Survey.埃塞俄比亚五岁以下儿童超重/肥胖的空间变化及其预测因素:2019 年埃塞俄比亚迷你人口与健康调查的地理加权回归分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 14;19(10):e0312025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312025. eCollection 2024.
4
Spatial variation and geographical weighted regression analysis to explore open defecation practice and its determinants among households in Ethiopia.空间变异与地理加权回归分析探索埃塞俄比亚家庭中露天排便行为及其决定因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307362. eCollection 2024.
5
Spatial variation of overweight/obesity and associated factor among reproductive age group women in Ethiopia, evidence from EDHS 2016.埃塞俄比亚生育年龄组妇女超重/肥胖的空间变异性及其相关因素分析。来自 2016 年 EDHS 的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0277955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277955. eCollection 2022.
6
Spatial distribution and determinant factors of unmet need for family planning among all reproductive-age women in Ethiopia: a multi-level logistic regression modelling approach.埃塞俄比亚所有育龄妇女计划生育需求未满足情况的空间分布及决定因素:多层次逻辑回归建模方法
Contracept Reprod Med. 2022 Aug 1;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40834-022-00178-9.
7
Spatial variation and associated factors of home delivery among reproductive age group women in Ethiopia, evidence from Performance Monitoring for Action Ethiopia Survey 2019, spatial and multilevel logistic regression analysis.埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女在家分娩的空间差异及相关因素:来自2019年埃塞俄比亚行动绩效监测调查的证据,空间和多水平逻辑回归分析
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Dec 16;5:1474762. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1474762. eCollection 2024.
8
Geospatial variation of exclusive breastfeeding and its determinants among mothers of infants under 6 months in Ethiopia: spatial and geographical weighted regression analysis.埃塞俄比亚 6 个月以下婴儿母亲纯母乳喂养的空间差异及其决定因素:空间和地理加权回归分析。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Apr 29;8(Suppl 2):e002573. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002573.
9
Geospatial variations and determinants of contraceptive utilization among married reproductive age women in Ethiopia: spatial and multilevel analysis of Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey, 2019.埃塞俄比亚已婚育龄妇女避孕措施使用情况的地理空间差异及影响因素:2019年埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查的空间及多层次分析
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Sep 22;4:1151031. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1151031. eCollection 2023.
10
Geographical clustering and geographically weighted regression analysis of home delivery and its determinants in developing regions of Ethiopia: a spatial analysis.埃塞俄比亚发展中地区家庭分娩及其决定因素的地理聚类和地理加权回归分析:一项空间分析
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 19;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12982-022-00117-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Process of use of evidence products by frontline maternal, newborn and child health staff at the facility level in Ghana.加纳医疗机构层面的一线孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康工作人员使用证据产品的过程。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 26;20(2):e0292505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292505. eCollection 2025.
2
Spatial variations and multi-level determinants of modern contraceptive utilization among young women (15-24 years) in Ethiopia: spatial and multi-level analysis of mini-EDHS 2019.埃塞俄比亚年轻女性(15至24岁)现代避孕方法使用情况的空间差异及多层次决定因素:2019年微型埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查的空间及多层次分析
Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 Apr 10;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00224-0.
3
Knowledge and utilization of family planning among rural postpartum women in Southwest Nigeria.
尼日利亚西南部农村产后妇女的计划生育知识与应用情况
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Feb;10(2):730-737. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1312_20. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
4
Using geographically weighted regression analysis to cluster under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Evidence from demographic and health survey.利用地理加权回归分析对埃塞俄比亚五岁以下儿童的营养不良及其预测因素进行聚类:来自人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 May 21;16(5):e0248156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248156. eCollection 2021.
5
Spatial distribution and associated factors of underweight in Ethiopia: An analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health survey, 2016.埃塞俄比亚消瘦的空间分布及其相关因素:对 2016 年埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查的分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242744. eCollection 2020.
6
Factors influencing the use of modern contraceptive in Nigeria: a multilevel logistic analysis using linked data from performance monitoring and accountability 2020.影响尼日利亚现代避孕措施使用的因素:利用 2020 年绩效监测和问责制的关联数据进行多层次逻辑分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01059-6.
7
Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: protocol for a multi-site cohort study.未满足的计划生育需求的原因,关注生育偏好的测量:一项多中心队列研究方案
Reprod Health. 2017 Feb 9;14(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0268-z.
8
Exposure to family planning messages and modern contraceptive use among men in urban Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal: a cross-sectional study.肯尼亚、尼日利亚和塞内加尔城市男性接触计划生育信息及现代避孕方法使用情况:一项横断面研究。
Reprod Health. 2015 Jul 22;12:63. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0056-1.
9
Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies.改善产后避孕措施使用情况的策略:来自非随机研究的证据
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD011298. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011298.pub2.
10
Demand for long acting and permanent contraceptive methods and associated factors among married women of reproductive age group in Debre Markos Town, North West Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部德布雷马科斯镇育龄已婚妇女对长效和永久性避孕方法的需求及相关因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Mar 13;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-46.