Durrans D, Armstrong C P, Taylor T V
Br J Surg. 1985 Jul;72(7):525-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720707.
A prospective study has been made of the use of the Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of hiatus hernia and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Forty-one patients under the care of one surgeon were studied over a 3-year period. The operation is simple and safe to perform. Twelve patients suffered transient dysphagia which spontaneously resolved within 3 months. Satisfactory results were obtained thereafter in 80.9 per cent. Seven of the prostheses have been removed (17.1 per cent), all within 18 months of performing the operation. Dysphagia and recurrent symptoms were the main reasons for removal and in two of these stricturing was present pre-operatively. We feel the presence of an established stricture is a contraindication to the use of the device. We have, however, been impressed by its use as a second procedure when previous surgery has failed and when revisional surgery for recurrent hiatus hernia is difficult due to dense adhesion formation. While it is still early to assess the legacy that the use of this prosthesis might incur, we would recommend conservatism if not abandonment of its use until longer-term evaluation is available.
一项关于使用安吉尔奇克假体治疗食管裂孔疝和胃食管反流的前瞻性研究已经展开。在3年的时间里,对一位外科医生所诊治的41例患者进行了研究。该手术操作简单且安全。12例患者出现短暂性吞咽困难,3个月内自行缓解。此后,80.9%的患者获得了满意的效果。7个假体已被取出(17.1%),均在手术后18个月内。吞咽困难和症状复发是取出假体的主要原因,其中2例在术前就存在狭窄。我们认为,已确诊的狭窄是使用该装置的禁忌症。然而,当先前的手术失败且由于致密粘连形成而难以对复发性食管裂孔疝进行修复手术时,将其作为二次手术使用给我们留下了深刻的印象。虽然现在评估使用这种假体可能产生的长期影响还为时过早,但在获得更长期的评估结果之前,我们建议谨慎使用甚至放弃使用它。