• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性休克期间新发室上性心律失常的风险、心率或节律控制:CAFS多中心、平行组、开放标签试验方案

Risk, rate or rhythm control for new onset supraventricular arrhythmia during septic shock: protocol for the CAFS multicentre, parallel-group, open-label trial.

作者信息

Labbé Vincent, Desnos Cyrielle, Preau Sebastien, Doyen Denis, Contou Damien, Bagate François, Souweine Bertrand, Pey Vincent, Bertrand Pierre-Marie, Müller Grégoire, Boissier Florence, Asfar Pierre, Bonnet Nicolas, Joffre Jérémie, Sy Oumar, Dres Martin, Annoni Filippo, Monnet Xavier, Carreira Serge, Vivier Emmanuel, Serck Nicolas, Wiart Adil, Voicu Sebastian, Heming Nicholas, Le Breton Camille, Chevrel Guillaume, Chemouni Frank, Piagnerelli Michael, Haentjens Lionel, Fartoukh Muriel, Taccone Fabio, Durand Dominique, Monthieux Gladys, Berard Laurence, Rousseau Alexandra, Mekontso Dessap Armand

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Anderlecht, Brussels, Belgium

Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS (Cardiovascular and Respiratory Manifestations of Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis), Universite Paris-Est Creteil Val de Marne, Créteil, Île-de-France, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):e090404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090404.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090404
PMID:40169282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11962806/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

New-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (NOSVA) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with septic shock and is associated with haemodynamic alterations and increased mortality rates. With no data available from randomised trials, clinical practice for patient management varies widely. In this setting, rate control or rhythm control could be beneficial in limiting the duration of shock and preventing evolution to multiorgan dysfunction.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Control Atrial Fibrillation in Septic shock (CAFS) study is a binational (French and Belgium), multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled superiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of three management strategies in patients with NOSVA during septic shock. The expected duration of patient enrolment is 42 months, starting from November 2021. Patients will be randomised to receive either risk control (magnesium and control of risk factors for NOSVA), rate control (risk control and low dose of amiodarone) or rhythm control (risk control and cardioversion using high dose of amiodarone with external electrical shock if NOSVA persists) for 7 days. Patients with a history of SVA, NOSVA lasting more than 48 hours, recent cardiac surgery or a contraindication to amiodarone will not be included. We plan to recruit 240 patients. Patients will be randomised on a 1:1:1 basis and stratified by centre. The primary endpoint is a hierarchical criterion at day 28 including all-cause mortality and the duration of septic shock defined as time from randomisation to successful weaning of vasopressors. Secondary outcomes include: individual components of the primary endpoint; arterial lactate clearance at day 3; efficacy at controlling cardiac rhythm at day 7; proportion of patients free from organ dysfunction at day 7; ventricular arrhythmia, conduction disorders, thrombotic events, major bleeding events and acute hepatitis related to amiodarone at day 28; intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay at day 28.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the French (Comité Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer II, France, registration number 2019-A02624-53) and Belgian (Comité éthique de l'hôpital Erasme, Belgium, registration number CCB B4062023000179) ethics committees. Patients will be included after obtaining signed informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04844801.

摘要

引言

新发室上性心律失常(NOSVA)是感染性休克患者中最常见的心律失常,与血流动力学改变及死亡率增加相关。由于缺乏随机试验数据,患者管理的临床实践差异很大。在这种情况下,心率控制或节律控制可能有助于缩短休克持续时间并防止发展为多器官功能障碍。

方法与分析

感染性休克心房颤动控制(CAFS)研究是一项双边(法国和比利时)、多中心、平行组、开放标签的随机对照优效性试验,旨在比较感染性休克期间NOSVA患者三种管理策略的疗效和安全性。预计患者入组时间为42个月,从2021年11月开始。患者将被随机分配接受风险控制(镁剂及控制NOSVA的危险因素)、心率控制(风险控制及低剂量胺碘酮)或节律控制(风险控制及若NOSVA持续则使用高剂量胺碘酮并进行体外电击复律),为期7天。有室上性心律失常病史、NOSVA持续超过48小时、近期心脏手术或对胺碘酮有禁忌证的患者将不纳入。我们计划招募240名患者。患者将按1:1:1随机分组,并按中心分层。主要终点是第28天的分层标准,包括全因死亡率及感染性休克持续时间,感染性休克持续时间定义为从随机分组到成功停用血管升压药的时间。次要结局包括:主要终点的各个组成部分;第3天的动脉血乳酸清除率;第7天控制心律的疗效;第7天无器官功能障碍患者的比例;第28天与胺碘酮相关的室性心律失常、传导障碍、血栓事件、大出血事件及急性肝炎;第28天重症监护病房住院时间和医院住院时间。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得法国(法国西南部及海外地区委员会II,注册号2019 - A02624 - 53)和比利时(比利时伊拉斯谟医院伦理委员会,注册号CCB B4062023000179)伦理委员会的批准。患者将在获得签署的知情同意书后纳入。研究结果将提交至同行评审期刊发表。

试验注册号

NCT04844801。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d76c/11962806/c9b4cb223b72/bmjopen-15-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d76c/11962806/0b346bd2a522/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d76c/11962806/c9b4cb223b72/bmjopen-15-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d76c/11962806/0b346bd2a522/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d76c/11962806/c9b4cb223b72/bmjopen-15-4-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk, rate or rhythm control for new onset supraventricular arrhythmia during septic shock: protocol for the CAFS multicentre, parallel-group, open-label trial.感染性休克期间新发室上性心律失常的风险、心率或节律控制:CAFS多中心、平行组、开放标签试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):e090404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090404.
2
External electrical and pharmacological cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardias: a network meta-analysis.体外电复律和药物复律治疗心房颤动、心房扑动或房性心动过速的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 3;6(6):CD013255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013255.pub2.
3
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
4
Curative catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter: systematic review and economic evaluation.心房颤动和典型心房扑动的根治性导管消融术:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Nov;12(34):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-198. doi: 10.3310/hta12340.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
8
Systematic review of the management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者心房颤动管理的系统评价
Eur Heart J. 2000 Apr;21(8):614-32. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1767.
9
Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.择期髋关节或膝关节手术患者预防出血的药物干预措施:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;1(1):CD013295. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013295.pub2.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical impact of successful cardioversion for new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill septic patients: A preliminary study.成功心脏复律对重症脓毒症患者新发房颤的临床影响:一项初步研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Apr;116(4):230-233. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
Transesophageal echocardiography for cardiovascular risk estimation in patients with sepsis and new-onset atrial fibrillation: a multicenter prospective pilot study.经食管超声心动图用于脓毒症和新发房颤患者心血管风险评估:一项多中心前瞻性初步研究
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Oct 18;11(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00934-1.
3
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.
拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
4
A survey on the management of new onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients with septic shock.脓毒性休克重症患者新发房颤管理的调查
J Crit Care. 2021 Feb;61:18-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC.2020年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动诊断和管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动诊断和管理特别工作组,由ESC欧洲心律协会(EHRA)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
6
Effect of Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With an Esophageal Pressure-Guided Strategy vs an Empirical High PEEP-Fio2 Strategy on Death and Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经食管压力引导的滴定呼气末正压(PEEP)策略与经验性高 PEEP-FiO2 策略对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率和机械通气撤机天数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):846-857. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0555.
7
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会与胸外科医师协会合作报告
Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Non-antiarrhythmic interventions in new onset and paroxysmal sepsis-related atrial fibrillation.新发及阵发性脓毒症相关性心房颤动的非抗心律失常干预措施
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jan;44(1):94-97. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4986-7. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.2016年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动管理指南。
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1609-1678. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw295. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
10
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis. A Cohort Study.严重脓毒症患者新发心房颤动的发生率、预测因素和结局:一项队列研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 15;195(2):205-211. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0618OC.