Araujo Adela N, Nguyen Khanh, Strebel Leila, Corby Trenton, Rhodes Melanie A, Beck Benjamin H, Roy Luke A, Davis D Allen
School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA.
Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Auburn, Alabama 36832, USA.
Aquac Nutr. 2025 Mar 25;2025:4942439. doi: 10.1155/anu/4942439. eCollection 2025.
Feed management and the nutrient content of the diet are two of the most important factors in shrimp culture, as feed makes up around 60% of the total variable costs. Given the cost of protein and its effect on growth, it is critical to understand the effects of both dietary protein and feeding rates on shrimp performance. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different protein intake levels on growth performance, nutrient retention efficiency, and whole-body composition of Pacific white shrimp () using different levels of crude protein (CP). This was done by feeding four practical diets with 40%, 35%, 30%, and 25% of CP, which were fed at two different rates, one of them being the standard feed rate (100%) and a second adjusted rate to match the protein supplied (40% protein equivalence), resulting in a total of eight treatments with four replicates each. The total ration for each of the treatments was spread out into four feedings per day. Juvenile shrimp (0.41 ± 0.01 g) were stocked into a green water outdoor recirculating system with 32 circular tanks at a density of 30 individuals/tank and reared for 11 weeks. A recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) with green water (~30°C) was used for this trial, which consisted of a central reservoir (⁓1000 L) and treatment tanks (⁓800 L). At the end of the trial, growth performance parameters including final weight, weight gain (WG), biomass, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were found to be significantly different among treatments ( < 0.05). Average survival was between 94% and 98% for all the treatments. All final body composition values (dry matter, CP, and minerals) did not show significant differences between treatments except for fat ( < 0.05). However, feed utilization measurements including apparent net protein retention (ANPR), and phosphorus retention (PR) showed to have significant differences ( < 0.01), ranging 49%-66% and 16%-27%, respectively. The results from this study demonstrated that treatments with higher protein intake resulted in the best growth performance, meanwhile treatments with lower protein intake had the highest nutrient retention values.
饲料管理和日粮营养成分是对虾养殖中两个最重要的因素,因为饲料成本约占可变总成本的60%。鉴于蛋白质成本及其对生长的影响,了解日粮蛋白质和投喂率对虾生长性能的影响至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是通过使用不同水平的粗蛋白(CP)来评估不同蛋白质摄入量对太平洋白虾( )生长性能、养分保留效率和全身体组成的影响。具体做法是投喂四种实用日粮,其CP含量分别为40%、35%、30%和25%,以两种不同的投喂率投喂,其中一种是标准投喂率(100%),另一种是根据蛋白质供应量调整的投喂率(40%蛋白质当量),总共产生八个处理组,每组四个重复。每个处理组的总投喂量每天分四次投喂。将幼虾(0.41±0.01克)放养到一个室外绿水循环系统中,该系统有32个圆形养殖池,放养密度为30尾/池,并养殖11周。本试验使用了一个绿水循环水养殖系统(RAS)(约30°C),该系统由一个中央蓄水池(约1000升)和养殖池(约800升)组成。试验结束时,发现各处理组之间的生长性能参数,包括终末体重、增重(WG)、生物量和饲料转化率(FCR)存在显著差异( <0.05)。所有处理组的平均存活率在94%至98%之间。除脂肪外( <0.05),所有终末体组成值(干物质、CP和矿物质)在各处理组之间均未显示出显著差异。然而,包括表观净蛋白保留率(ANPR)和磷保留率(PR)在内的饲料利用率测量结果显示存在显著差异( <0.01),分别在49%-66%和16%-27%之间。本研究结果表明,较高蛋白质摄入量的处理组生长性能最佳,而较低蛋白质摄入量的处理组养分保留值最高。