Li Gangping, Fu Yuewen, Zhang Di
Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Department of Medical Records Management, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 18;15:1521099. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1521099. eCollection 2025.
Evidence on the association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in adults with cancer is limited.
This study aimed to examine the relationship between NLR and all-cause and CVD mortality in adults with cancer.
A retrospective cohort study included 2,639 cancer patients in the U.S. from the NHANES dataset (2005-2018), collecting demographic, laboratory, and mortality data. Multivariable Cox regression analysis, subgroup analysis and restricted cubic spline analyses assessed the associations between NLR and mortality outcomes.
During a median follow-up of 77 months, 713 (27.0%) deaths occurred, including 149 (5.6%) from CVD. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that a high NLR, treated as a continuous variable, was significantly correlated with increased all-cause mortality (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12; p < 0.001) and CVD mortality (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.19; p < 0.001). Meanwhile, when evaluating NLR as a categorical variable, the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for NLR and all-cause mortality in quartiles Q2 (1.6-2.2), Q3 (2.2-3), and Q4 (>3) were 1.06 (95% CI: 0.83-1.34, p = 0.062), 1.12 (95% CI: 0.89-1.42, p = 0.334), and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.04-1.63, p = 0.021), respectively, when compared with individuals in the lower quartile Q1 (≤1.6). In terms of CVD mortality, the adjusted HR values for NLR in Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.50-1.69, p = 0.062), 1.24 (95% CI: 0.71-12.19, p = 0.334), and 1.76 (95% CI: 1.04-2.97, p = 0.034), respectively, compared to those in the lower NLR quartile Q1 (≤1.6). Subgroup analysis showed similar patterns (all p-values for interaction > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated lower survival rates for individuals with higher NLR, and RCS analysis suggested a positive linear relationship between NLR and all-cause and CVD mortality.
Elevated NLR is linked to higher all-cause and CVD mortality risks among adults with cancer.
关于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与癌症成年患者全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率之间关联的证据有限。
本研究旨在探讨NLR与癌症成年患者全因死亡率和CVD死亡率之间的关系。
一项回顾性队列研究纳入了来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据集(2005 - 2018年)的2639例癌症患者,收集了人口统计学、实验室检查和死亡率数据。多变量Cox回归分析、亚组分析和限制性立方样条分析评估了NLR与死亡率结局之间的关联。
在中位随访77个月期间,发生了713例(27.0%)死亡,其中149例(5.6%)死于CVD。多变量Cox回归分析显示,将高NLR作为连续变量时,其与全因死亡率增加显著相关(HR = 1.09;95%CI:1.05 - 1.12;p < 0.001)和CVD死亡率增加显著相关(HR = 1.12;95%CI:1.05 - 1.19;p < 0.001)。同时,当将NLR作为分类变量评估时,与NLR较低的第一四分位数Q1(≤1.6)中的个体相比,第二四分位数Q2(1.6 - 2.2)、第三四分位数Q3(2.2 - 3)和第四四分位数Q4(>3)中NLR与全因死亡率的调整后风险比(HR)分别为1.06(95%CI:0.83 - 1.34,p = 0.062)、1.12(95%CI:0.89 - 1.42,p = 0.334)和1.30(95%CI:1.04 - 1.63,p = 0.021)。就CVD死亡率而言,与NLR较低的第一四分位数Q1(≤1.6)中的个体相比,第二四分位数Q2、第三四分位数Q3和第四四分位数Q4中NLR的调整后HR值分别为0.92(95%CI:0.50 - 1.69,p = 0.062)、1.24(95%CI:0.71 - 12.19,p = 0.334)和1.76(95%CI:1.04 - 2.97,p = 0.034)。亚组分析显示了相似的模式(所有交互作用的p值>0.05)。Kaplan - Meier分析表明NLR较高的个体生存率较低,并且限制性立方样条分析表明NLR与全因死亡率和CVD死亡率之间存在正线性关系。
NLR升高与癌症成年患者较高的全因死亡率和CVD死亡率风险相关。