Roy D, Marchand E, Théroux P, Waters D D, Pelletier G B, Bourassa M G
Circulation. 1985 Sep;72(3):487-94. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.3.487.
The prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation and its usefulness in relation to other forms of invasive and noninvasive testing was evaluated in 150 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias of 6 beats or more were induced in 35 (23%) patients. No significant differences existed between patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias and those without inducible ventricular tachycardia with respect to occurrence of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in the acute and early recovery phase of infarction or predischarge exercise-induced ischemia or arrhythmias, severity of coronary artery disease, or degree of left ventricular dysfunction. A higher incidence of inferior myocardial infarction was observed in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia when compared with those without inducible ventricular tachycardia (66% vs 41%, p less than .01). During a mean follow-up of 10 +/- 5 months (range 2 to 19), there were two sudden deaths, three nonsudden deaths, and two additional patients developed sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. There was no significant difference between patients with and those without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias with respect to the occurrence of these events. In this study population, a lower mean ejection fraction (p less than .01), the presence of a ventricular aneurysm (p less than .05), and exercise-induced ventricular premature contractions (p less than .05) were predictors of sudden death and of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia. Thus, the findings of this study do not support the hypothesis that the induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction identifies a group at high risk for sudden cardiac death.
对150例急性心肌梗死幸存者评估了程序性心室刺激的预后意义及其与其他形式的有创和无创检查相比的有用性。35例(23%)患者诱发出6次或更多次的室性快速心律失常。在梗死急性期和早期恢复阶段的自发性室性心律失常的发生、出院前运动诱发的缺血或心律失常、冠状动脉疾病的严重程度或左心室功能障碍程度方面,可诱发出室性快速心律失常的患者与未诱发出室性心动过速的患者之间没有显著差异。与未诱发出室性心动过速的患者相比,诱发出室性心动过速的患者下壁心肌梗死的发生率更高(66%对41%,p<0.01)。在平均10±5个月(范围2至19个月)的随访期间,有2例猝死、3例非猝死,另有2例患者发生持续性室性快速心律失常。在这些事件的发生方面,诱发出室性快速心律失常的患者与未诱发出室性快速心律失常的患者之间没有显著差异。在该研究人群中,较低的平均射血分数(p<0.01)、室壁瘤的存在(p<0.05)和运动诱发的室性早搏(p<0.05)是猝死和自发性室性心动过速的预测因素。因此,本研究结果不支持以下假设:在急性心肌梗死恢复期患者中诱发出室性快速心律失常可识别出心脏性猝死高危人群。