Toffaletti J, Lee K M
Clin Chem. 1985 Aug;31(8):1349-52.
We analyzed 93 sera and 81 whole-blood samples, plus several aqueous materials and one serum-based material as controls, with two analyzers for ionized calcium (Radiometer ICA 1 and AVL 980). On 16 days, comparisons of results for patients' samples were good, with nearly all between-instrument differences (delta Ca2+) of samples being within 0.04 mmol/L. On 12 days, comparisons were mediocre, with the delta Ca2+ of samples usually 0.04 to 0.10 mmol/L. The control material that most consistently indicated the direction and magnitude of the delta Ca2+ of patients' samples was the serum-based control. Adjustment of results for samples from patients, based on the delta Ca2+ of the serum control on the same day, substantially improved comparisons between instruments. Our findings suggest that the use of a serum-based calibrator provides the most valid comparison between different calcium-ion analyzers and reliably indicates when electrode replacement is needed.
我们使用两台离子钙分析仪(Radiometer ICA 1和AVL 980)分析了93份血清和81份全血样本,以及几种水性材料和一种基于血清的材料作为对照。在16天里,患者样本结果的比较良好,几乎所有样本的仪器间差异(ΔCa2+)都在0.04 mmol/L以内。在12天里,比较结果一般,样本的ΔCa2+通常在0.04至0.10 mmol/L之间。最能始终如一地指示患者样本ΔCa2+方向和大小的对照材料是基于血清的对照。根据同一天血清对照的ΔCa2+对患者样本的结果进行调整,显著改善了仪器间的比较。我们的研究结果表明,使用基于血清的校准物能在不同钙离子分析仪之间提供最有效的比较,并能可靠地指示何时需要更换电极。