Surian Luca, Parise Eugenio, Geraci Alessandra
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
CIMeC - Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Hum Nat. 2025 Mar;36(1):121-142. doi: 10.1007/s12110-025-09490-0. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
We review recent experimental studies relevant to assess the proposal that human infants possess a sense of fairness that relies on sociomoral knowledge. We propose that this knowledge may include a core concept of justice with four foundational aspects: impartiality, agency, obligatoriness and conflicting claims. Infants' and toddlers' looking times, manual preferences and spontaneous actions provide some evidence for the first three features. Very early-emerging sociomoral evaluations and expectations about resource distributions show that infants process morally relevant information about distributors and recipients, suggesting that they are sensitive to the agency and impartiality constraints. Early evaluations appear to be linked to third-party expressions of praise or admonishment and to the deliverance of rewards and punishment, providing initial support for the obligatoriness constraint. More work is needed to investigate the sensitivity to conflicting claims, to assess the universality of early emerging evaluation skills and to show how core concepts relate to the development of explicit judgments and beliefs about duties and rights.
我们回顾了近期的实验研究,这些研究与评估人类婴儿具有依赖社会道德知识的公平感这一观点相关。我们提出,这种知识可能包括一个具有四个基本方面的正义核心概念:公正性、能动性、强制性和相互冲突的主张。婴儿和幼儿的注视时间、手动偏好和自发行为为前三个特征提供了一些证据。非常早期出现的关于资源分配的社会道德评价和期望表明,婴儿会处理与分配者和接受者相关的道德信息,这表明他们对能动性和公正性限制很敏感。早期评价似乎与第三方的赞扬或告诫表达以及奖惩的给予有关,为强制性限制提供了初步支持。需要更多的研究来调查对相互冲突主张的敏感性,评估早期出现的评价技能的普遍性,并展示核心概念如何与关于义务和权利的明确判断及信念的发展相关联。