Calabrese Pascale, Lambert-Lacroix Sophie
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, Grenoble, France.
Physiol Rep. 2025 Apr;13(7):e70245. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70245.
Breathing and ECG were recorded in 33 healthy human subjects at rest. The RR interval was labeled according to its occurrence in the respiratory phases: II (both R waves during inspiration), IE (first R wave in inspiration and following R wave in expiration), EE (both R waves during expiration), and EI (first R wave in expiration and following R wave in inspiration). For each subject, II and EE intervals were plotted versus normalized mean inspiratory duration and normalized mean expiratory duration, respectively, and correlation coefficients and slopes of regression lines were calculated. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare these slopes between and within individuals. These relationships appeared to be linear in most cases, although neither the decrease nor the increase in heart rate occurred at the same rate for all subjects. Overall, the slope associated with II intervals was not higher, in terms of absolute values, than the slope associated with EE intervals for the same subject. Our results underscore the difference between inspiratory and expiratory sinus arrhythmia and suggest that the effects of any stimulation presumed to induce changes in vagal cardiac activity should primarily be sought during expiration.
对33名健康受试者在静息状态下记录呼吸和心电图。RR间期根据其在呼吸阶段的出现情况进行标记:II(吸气时的两个R波)、IE(吸气时的第一个R波和呼气时的后续R波)、EE(呼气时的两个R波)和EI(呼气时的第一个R波和吸气时的后续R波)。对于每个受试者,分别将II和EE间期与标准化平均吸气持续时间和标准化平均呼气持续时间作图,并计算相关系数和回归线斜率。进行统计分析以比较个体之间和个体内部的这些斜率。在大多数情况下,这些关系似乎是线性的,尽管并非所有受试者的心率下降或上升速率都相同。总体而言,就绝对值而言,同一受试者与II间期相关的斜率不高于与EE间期相关的斜率。我们的结果强调了吸气性和呼气性窦性心律失常之间的差异,并表明任何假定会引起迷走神经心脏活动变化的刺激的影响,主要应在呼气期间寻找。