Besleaga Tudor, Blum Michaël, Briot Raphaël, Vovc Victor, Moldovanu Ion, Calabrese Pascale
Department of Human Physiology and Biophysics, State Medical and Pharmaceutical University "Nicolae Testemitanu", Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
UJF-Grenoble 1/CNRS/TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525/BCM Team, 38041, Grenoble, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jan;116(1):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3260-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
The aim of this study is to investigate the individuality of airflow shapes during volitional hyperventilation.
Ventilation was recorded on 18 healthy subjects following two protocols: (1) spontaneous breathing (SP1) followed by a volitional hyperventilation at each subject's spontaneous (HVSP) breathing rate, (2) spontaneous breathing (SP2) followed by hyperventilation at 20/min (HV20). HVSP and HV20 were performed at the same level of hypocapnia: end tidal CO2 (FETCO2) was maintained at 1% below the spontaneous level. At each breath, the tidal volume (VT), the breath (TTOT), the inspiratory (TI) and expiratory durations, the minute ventilation, VT/TI, TI/TTOT and the airflow shape were quantified by harmonic analysis. Under different conditions of breathing, we test if the airflow profiles of the same individual are more similar than airflow profiles between individuals.
Minute ventilation was not significantly different between SP1 (6.71 ± 1.64 l·min(-1)) and SP2 (6.57 ± 1.31 l·min(-1)) nor between HVSP (15.88 ± 4.92 l·min(-1)) and HV20 (15.87 ± 4.16 l·min(-1)). Similar results were obtained for FETCO2 between SP1 (5.06 ± 0.54 %) and SP2 (5.00 ± 0.51%), and HVSP (4.07 ± 0.51%) and HV20 (3.88 ± 0.42%). Only TI/TTOT remained unchanged in all four conditions. Airflow shapes were similar when comparing SP1-SP2, HVSP-HV20, and SP1-HVSP but not similar when comparing SP2-HV20.
These results suggest the existence of an individuality of airflow shape during volitional hyperventilation. We conclude that volitional ventilation alike automatic breathing follows inherent properties of the ventilatory system. Registered by Pascale Calabrese on ClinicalTrials.gov, # NCT01881945.
本研究旨在调查自主过度通气期间气流形态的个体差异。
按照两种方案记录了18名健康受试者的通气情况:(1)自主呼吸(SP1),随后以每个受试者的自主呼吸频率进行自主过度通气(HVSP);(2)自主呼吸(SP2),随后以20次/分钟的频率进行过度通气(HV20)。HVSP和HV20在相同的低碳酸血症水平下进行:呼气末二氧化碳(FETCO2)维持在比自主水平低1%。每次呼吸时,通过谐波分析对潮气量(VT)、呼吸时间(TTOT)、吸气时间(TI)和呼气时间、分钟通气量、VT/TI、TI/TTOT以及气流形态进行量化。在不同的呼吸条件下,我们测试同一个体的气流曲线是否比个体之间的气流曲线更相似。
SP1(6.71±1.64升·分钟-1)和SP2(6.57±1.31升·分钟-1)之间以及HVSP(15.88±4.92升·分钟-1)和HV20(15.87±4.16升·分钟-1)之间的分钟通气量无显著差异。SP1(5.06±0.54%)和SP2(5.00±0.51%)之间以及HVSP(4.07±0.51%)和HV20(3.88±0.42%)之间的FETCO2也得到了类似结果。在所有四种条件下,只有TI/TTOT保持不变。比较SP1-SP2、HVSP-HV20和SP1-HVSP时气流形态相似,但比较SP2-HV20时气流形态不相似。
这些结果表明自主过度通气期间存在气流形态的个体差异。我们得出结论,自主通气与自动呼吸一样遵循通气系统的固有特性。由Pascale Calabrese在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,#NCT01881945。