• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别中风后采用健康生活方式的影响因素:一项使用理论领域框架指导分析的焦点小组研究。

Identifying mediators of healthy lifestyle adoption after stroke: a focus group study using a Theoretical Domains Framework guided analysis.

作者信息

Hall Patricia, da Cruz Peniche Paula, Hickey Julianne, Lennon Olive

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Health Science Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

iPASTAR (Improving Pathways for Acute Stroke and Rehabilitation) Collaborative Doctoral Award, Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04144-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-025-04144-1
PMID:40175889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11963367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lifestyle measures in addition to pharmacotherapy are recommended to optimise stroke secondary prevention. Adopting and sustaining good health behaviours after stroke necessitates ongoing motivation, influenced by complex social and cultural factors. This study analysed stroke survivors' experiences of addressing their lifestyle-related risks through a comprehensive theoretical lens addressing cognitive, affective, social, and environmental influences. Patient and public involvement (PPI) enhanced the research quality and transparency.

METHODS

Eight focus group discussions (N = 35 stroke participants; N = 3 family members/informal carers) were facilitated using semi-structured questions co-developed with a PPI panel. Purposive sampling ensured adequate representation (e.g. urban/rural location and stroke-related disabilities). Data were first coded and categorised inductively and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) deductively to identify relevant constructs and theories of behaviour-change.

RESULTS

Participants reported risk reducing lifestyle changes as largely self-directed activities they figured out themselves. Their experiences mapped to 10 of the 14 theoretical domains of the TDF. The most reported behaviour-change mediators discussed were in the domains of Knowledge and Social Influences, seen as encouraging change and supporting emotional reactions. Goals were discussed in a limited way indicating underutilisation. Reminders, reinforcements, and rules to observe for maintaining healthy behaviours, mapping to the Reinforcement and Behavioural Regulation domains, were valued constructs. Psychosocial challenges, emotional responses and cognitive difficulties (Memory, Attention & Decision Processes and Emotions domains) were strongly evident, resonating with the experiences of our PPI contributor and interfacing with behaviour change processes and knowledge uptake. Health-beliefs, self-identity and perceived ability to change behaviour were considered to assert both positive and negative influences on behaviours, mapping to Social/Professional Role & Identity, Beliefs about Consequences and Beliefs about Capabilities domains. 'Know how' was highlighted as largely lacking for behaviour change, with the associated theoretical domains Intentions, Skills, Environmental context & resources to encourage skills development and Optimism about change notably absent from discussions.

CONCLUSIONS

The TDF proved a valuable tool to link stroke survivors' secondary prevention experiences and unmet needs with recognised constructs for behaviour-change. Results have important theory-driven implications to guide future interventions designed to support individuals in risk reducing behaviours following stroke.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf49/11963367/54df9ae4dbaf/12883_2025_4144_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf49/11963367/54df9ae4dbaf/12883_2025_4144_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf49/11963367/54df9ae4dbaf/12883_2025_4144_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

除药物治疗外,还建议采取生活方式干预措施以优化卒中二级预防。卒中后采用并维持良好的健康行为需要持续的动力,这受到复杂的社会和文化因素影响。本研究通过一个综合的理论视角,分析了卒中幸存者应对与生活方式相关风险的经历,该视角涵盖认知、情感、社会和环境影响。患者及公众参与(PPI)提高了研究质量和透明度。

方法

使用与PPI小组共同制定的半结构化问题,组织了八次焦点小组讨论(35名卒中参与者;3名家庭成员/非正式照料者)。目的抽样确保了充分的代表性(如城乡地点和卒中相关残疾情况)。数据首先进行归纳编码和分类,然后演绎映射到理论领域框架(TDF),以识别行为改变的相关结构和理论。

结果

参与者报告称,降低风险的生活方式改变主要是他们自己想出的自我导向活动。他们的经历映射到TDF的14个理论领域中的10个。讨论最多的行为改变中介因素出现在知识和社会影响领域,被视为鼓励改变和支持情感反应。对目标的讨论有限,表明其未得到充分利用。与强化和行为调节领域相关的提醒、强化措施以及维持健康行为的观察规则是有价值的结构。心理社会挑战、情感反应和认知困难(记忆、注意力与决策过程以及情感领域)非常明显,与我们的PPI参与者的经历相呼应,并与行为改变过程和知识获取相关。健康信念、自我认同和感知到的行为改变能力被认为对行为有积极和消极影响,映射到社会/职业角色与认同、对后果的信念以及对能力的信念领域。讨论中明显缺乏行为改变所需的“操作方法”,相关的理论领域意图、技能、鼓励技能发展的环境背景与资源以及对改变的乐观态度在讨论中明显缺失。

结论

TDF被证明是一个有价值的工具,可将卒中幸存者的二级预防经历和未满足的需求与公认的行为改变结构联系起来。研究结果具有重要的理论驱动意义,可为未来旨在支持个体在卒中后采取降低风险行为的干预措施提供指导。

相似文献

1
Identifying mediators of healthy lifestyle adoption after stroke: a focus group study using a Theoretical Domains Framework guided analysis.识别中风后采用健康生活方式的影响因素:一项使用理论领域框架指导分析的焦点小组研究。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04144-1.
2
Reducing risk behaviours after stroke: An overview of reviews interrogating primary study data using the Theoretical Domains Framework.降低卒中后风险行为:使用理论领域框架对初级研究数据进行审查的概述。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0302364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302364. eCollection 2024.
3
An exploration of lifestyle beliefs and lifestyle behaviour following stroke: findings from a focus group study of patients and family members.探索中风后生活信念和生活行为:一项对患者和家属的焦点小组研究结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Dec 8;11:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-97.
4
What influences stroke survivors with physical disabilities to be physically active? A qualitative study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.哪些因素影响身体残疾的中风幸存者进行身体活动?一项基于理论领域框架的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0292442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292442. eCollection 2024.
5
Factors associated with health behaviours among stroke survivors: A mixed-methods study using COM-B model.与脑卒中幸存者健康行为相关的因素:基于 COM-B 模型的混合方法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jun;33(6):2138-2152. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17103. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
Factors influencing the prescribing behaviour of independent prescriber optometrists: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.影响独立处方配镜师处方行为的因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Mar;41(2):301-315. doi: 10.1111/opo.12782. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
7
A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians' beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.一项关于重症监护医师对其输血行为的信念的跨国比较:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2012 Sep 21;7:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-93.
8
Interventions for Behaviour Change and Self-Management of Risk in Stroke Secondary Prevention: An Overview of Reviews.中风二级预防中行为改变与风险自我管理的干预措施:综述概述
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024;53(1):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000531138. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
Key influences on university students' physical activity: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour.关键影响因素大学生的身体活动:使用理论领域框架和人类行为的 COM-B 模型进行系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4.
10
Qualitative study of Stroke Survivors' Perceptions of Secondary Prevention.中风幸存者对二级预防认知的定性研究
J Adv Nurs. 2022 May;78(5):1377-1388. doi: 10.1111/jan.15079. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing risk behaviours after stroke: An overview of reviews interrogating primary study data using the Theoretical Domains Framework.降低卒中后风险行为:使用理论领域框架对初级研究数据进行审查的概述。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0302364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302364. eCollection 2024.
2
Patients experience of cognitive fatigue post-stroke: an exploratory study.患者卒中后认知疲劳体验:一项探索性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(19):4514-4521. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2280065. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Making sense of a myocardial infarction in relation to changing lifestyle in the five months following the event: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.
解读心肌梗死后五个月内生活方式改变与之的关系:一项诠释现象学分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116348. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116348. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Secondary prevention of stroke. A telehealth-delivered physical activity and diet pilot randomized trial (ENAbLE-pilot).中风的二级预防。一项远程医疗提供的体育活动和饮食的先导随机试验(ENAbLE-pilot)。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Feb;19(2):199-208. doi: 10.1177/17474930231201360. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Interventions for Behaviour Change and Self-Management of Risk in Stroke Secondary Prevention: An Overview of Reviews.中风二级预防中行为改变与风险自我管理的干预措施:综述概述
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024;53(1):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000531138. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Cognitive Impairment After Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《缺血性卒中和出血性卒中后的认知障碍:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会的科学声明》
Stroke. 2023 Jun;54(6):e272-e291. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000430. Epub 2023 May 1.
7
Editorial: Stress, mood, and fatigue: Tackling "invisible" obstacles in stroke rehabilitation and recovery.社论:压力、情绪与疲劳:应对中风康复与恢复过程中的“无形”障碍
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 17;13:1121667. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1121667. eCollection 2022.
8
Promoting adherence to stroke secondary prevention behaviours by imparting behaviour change skills: protocol for a single-arm pilot trial of Living Well After Stroke.通过传授行为改变技能来促进中风二级预防行为的依从性:一项针对“中风后生活得更好”的单臂试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):e068003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068003.
9
Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on depression in poststroke patients-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于正念的减压和基于正念的认知疗法对脑卒中后患者抑郁的疗效:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Dec;163:111071. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111071. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
10
Perspectives and Experiences of Cardiac Rehabilitation after Stroke-A Qualitative Study.中风后心脏康复的观点与经验——一项定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 19;10(8):1579. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081579.