Suppr超能文献

骨关节同种异体移植与人工关节同种异体移植复合材料:在青少年和青春期前患者近端股骨肿瘤切除术后,哪种重建方法能带来更好的结果?

Osteoarticular allograft versus prosthetic allograft composites: which reconstruction method results in superior outcomes following the resection of proximal femur tumor in adolescent and preadolescent patients?

作者信息

Jamshidi Khodamorad, Bagherifard Abolfazl, Khabiri Seyyed Saeed, Mirzaei Alireza

机构信息

Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 2;26(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08598-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur in children are rare, and there is no consensus about the optimal reconstruction method for this condition. While methods for biological reconstruction-such as vascularized fibular allograft and rotationplasty-and nonbiological options like expandable endoprosthesis exist as reconstructive choices, each method has its distinct advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we compared the outcomes of osteoarticular allograft (OAA) with allograft-prosthetic component (APC) in reconstructing the proximal femur in a cohort of adolescent and preadolescent patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients aged between 8 and 13 years with primary malignant bone tumors of the proximal femur who were managed with either OAA or APC reconstruction were included. The median follow-up was 71 months (range 24-140). The primary outcome of interest was limb function evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Secondary outcomes of interest were surgical complications.

RESULTS

The median MSTS score of the patients was 23 (range 20-25) in the OAA group and 26 (range 23-27) in the APC group (P = 0.003). Postoperative complications in the OAA group included two nonunions (18.1%), two infections (18.1%), six degenerative joint diseases (54.5%), and one allograft fracture (9.1%). The postoperative complications in the APC group included one nonunion (11.1%), one dislocation (11.1%), and two allograft fractures (22.2%). Allograft fractures were managed with revision and replacement with a tumor prosthesis. No revision was done to address the DJD in the OAA group.

CONCLUSION

OA and APC reconstructions of the proximal femur following tumor resection in adolescent and preadolescent patients each have their benefits and associated complications. However, APC reconstruction appears to provide superior limb function and a lower incidence of postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

儿童股骨近端原发性恶性肿瘤较为罕见,对于这种情况的最佳重建方法尚无共识。虽然存在生物重建方法,如带血管腓骨移植和旋转成形术,以及非生物选择,如可膨胀假体,但每种方法都有其独特的优缺点。在本研究中,我们比较了骨关节异体移植(OAA)和异体移植-假体组件(APC)在一组青少年和青春期前患者中重建股骨近端的结果。

患者与方法

纳入20例年龄在8至13岁之间、患有股骨近端原发性恶性骨肿瘤并接受OAA或APC重建的患者。中位随访时间为71个月(范围24 - 140个月)。主要关注的结果是通过肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会(MSTS)评分评估的肢体功能。次要关注的结果是手术并发症。

结果

OAA组患者的MSTS评分中位数为23(范围20 - 25),APC组为26(范围23 - 27)(P = 0.003)。OAA组术后并发症包括2例骨不连(18.1%)、2例感染(18.1%)、6例退行性关节疾病(54.5%)和1例异体骨骨折(9.1%)。APC组术后并发症包括1例骨不连(11.1%)、1例脱位(11.1%)和2例异体骨骨折(22.2%)。异体骨骨折通过翻修并用肿瘤假体置换进行处理。OAA组未对退行性关节疾病进行翻修。

结论

青少年和青春期前患者肿瘤切除后股骨近端的OAA和APC重建各有其益处和相关并发症。然而,APC重建似乎能提供更好的肢体功能和更低的术后并发症发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c6/11963463/1439bea4f051/12891_2025_8598_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验