• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparative study of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy via intra and extra perinephric fat approaches.经肾周内、外脂肪途径后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的对比研究
BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01762-2.
2
The safety and efficiency of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy via extra and intra perinephric fat approaches: a retrospective clinical study.经肾周脂肪内外途径腹膜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的安全性与有效性:一项回顾性临床研究
BMC Surg. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0648-8.
3
Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.机器人辅助后腹腔镜单孔入路肾上腺切除术:技术可行性及初步结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2741-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
4
Retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive approaches for adrenal tumors: perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic, retroperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy.经腹腔腹腔镜、后腹腔腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺肿瘤的三种微创方法的回顾性比较:围手术期结果。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00637-y.
5
Comparison of synchronous bilateral transperitoneal and posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: results of a multicenter study.同期双侧经腹腔与后腹腔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较:一项多中心研究的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1101-1107. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07474-y. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
The Posterior Adiposity Index: A Quantitative Selection Tool for Adrenalectomy Approach.后脂指数:一种用于肾上腺切除术入路选择的定量工具。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jan;233:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
Surgical management of large adrenal tumors: impact of different laparoscopic approaches and resection methods on perioperative and long-term outcomes.大型肾上腺肿瘤的外科治疗:不同腹腔镜手术入路和切除方法对围手术期及长期预后的影响
BMC Urol. 2018 May 8;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0349-0.
8
Modified versus three-level technique of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for all patients with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm: a retrospective, case-controlled study.改良与三平面技术在后腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除术治疗所有直径≤6cm 的肾上腺病变患者中的应用:一项回顾性、病例对照研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 4;15:1342240. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1342240. eCollection 2024.
9
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with transient renal artery occlusion for large adrenal tumors (≥8 cm).经后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术并临时阻断肾动脉治疗巨大肾上腺肿瘤(≥8厘米)
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;117(5):1066-1072. doi: 10.1002/jso.25002. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
10
Association of Mayo Adhesive Probability Score With Perioperative Outcomes and Histological Characteristics of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy.Mayo 粘连可能性评分与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术中粘连性肾周脂肪的围手术期结局和组织学特征的相关性。
In Vivo. 2024 Nov-Dec;38(6):2836-2843. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13764.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic in adrenalectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106853. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106853. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Comparison between retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Are both equally safe?腹膜后腹腔镜与经腹腔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较:两者安全性相当吗?
J Visc Surg. 2021 Jun;158(3):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive approaches for adrenal tumors: perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic, retroperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy.经腹腔腹腔镜、后腹腔腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺肿瘤的三种微创方法的回顾性比较:围手术期结果。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00637-y.
4
The safety and efficiency of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy via extra and intra perinephric fat approaches: a retrospective clinical study.经肾周脂肪内外途径腹膜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的安全性与有效性:一项回顾性临床研究
BMC Surg. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0648-8.
5
Comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma: a single-center retrospective study.后腹腔镜与开放肾上腺切除术治疗大型嗜铬细胞瘤的比较:单中心回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun 29;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1649-x.
6
Total and partial laparoscopic adrenalectomy.全腹腔镜肾上腺切除术和部分腹腔镜肾上腺切除术。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Jun 3;65(5):578-585. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.578.
7
Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.经腹腔腹腔镜与开放性肾上腺切除术治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤的比较:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jan;61:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.018. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Robot-assisted Partial Adrenalectomy for the Treatment of Conn's Syndrome: Surgical Technique, and Perioperative and Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助部分肾上腺切除术治疗 Conn 综合征:手术技术、围手术期和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):811-816. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
Multicentre study evaluating the surgical learning curve for posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy.多中心研究评估后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的手术学习曲线。
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):544-551. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10740. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy.梅奥黏附概率评分:一种基于图像的准确评分系统,可预测部分肾切除术时肾周脂肪黏附。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.054. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

经肾周内、外脂肪途径后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的对比研究

A comparative study of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy via intra and extra perinephric fat approaches.

作者信息

Tan Qi, Lin Fan, He Yunfeng, Luo Shengjun

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road,Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01762-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-025-01762-2
PMID:40175968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11966895/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of retroperitoneal adrenalectomy via extra and intra perinephric fat approaches to provide experience and basis for resection of adrenal tumors through the retroperitoneal cavity.

METHODS

The clinical data of 284 patients undergoing retroperitoneal adrenalectomy in our hospital from December 2017 to March 2023 were collected. The basic characteristics of the two groups of patients and the changes in perioperative indicators were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients with intra perinephric fat approach (IPFA) were included,and 167 patients with extra perinephric fat approach (EPFA) were included. The estimated blood loss in the IPFA group (123.59 ± 50.76 ml) was higher than that in the EPFA group (99.10 ± 99.51 ml) (p = 0.015),and the operative time in the IPFA group(105.25 ± 42.25 min) was longer than that in the EPFA group(81.75 ± 30.45 min) (p < 0.001).The hospitalization expenses of IPFA patients (36,306.39 ± 7544.25RMB) were higher compared with patients receiving EPFA (32,122.77 ± 7284.00RMB) (p < 0.001).There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of tumor size,blood transfusion times and postoperative hospitalization time.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed via extra and intra perinephric fat approaches.IPFA is associated with higher estimated blood loss, and the operation time of EPFA is shorter than IPFA. The choice of surgical approach may depend primarily on the experience of the surgeon, the characteristics of adrenal tumor, and the nature of perirenal adipose tissue.

摘要

目的

探讨经肾周脂肪内外途径后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的安全性和有效性,为经后腹腔行肾上腺肿瘤切除术提供经验和依据。

方法

收集2017年12月至2023年3月在我院行后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的284例患者的临床资料。回顾性分析两组患者的基本特征及围手术期指标变化。

结果

共纳入117例经肾周脂肪内途径(IPFA)患者和167例经肾周脂肪外途径(EPFA)患者。IPFA组估计失血量(123.59±50.76 ml)高于EPFA组(99.10±99.51 ml)(p = 0.015),IPFA组手术时间(105.25±42.25 min)长于EPFA组(81.75±30.45 min)(p < 0.001)。IPFA患者住院费用(36306.39±7544.25元人民币)高于EPFA患者(32122.77±7284.00元人民币)(p < 0.001)。两组在肿瘤大小、输血次数和术后住院时间方面无显著差异。

结论

后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是一种安全有效的手术,可经肾周脂肪内外途径进行。IPFA估计失血量较高,EPFA手术时间短于IPFA。手术方式的选择可能主要取决于术者经验、肾上腺肿瘤特征及肾周脂肪组织性质。