Suppr超能文献

科罗拉多州电子音乐节参与者中试剂检测试剂盒和芬太尼检测试纸的使用情况:药物检测的流行率、障碍及应对行为

Use of reagent test kits and fentanyl test strips among electronic music festival attendees in Colorado: prevalence, barriers, and behavior in response to drug checking.

作者信息

Piercey Cianna J, Schlechter Thomas E, Henry Devin, Allen-Collins Mikayla, Ahern Riley, Cameron Joseph, Conner Bradley T, Snodgrass Jeffrey G, Karoly Hollis C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, 80262, USA.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2025 Apr 2;22(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01181-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polysubstance use is common at electronic dance music (EDM) events and hazards associated with polysubstance use may be exacerbated when people who use drugs are unaware of the contents of their drug sample. Reagent test kits (RTK) and fentanyl test strips (FTS) are two efficacious drug checking tools that people who use drugs might use to protect themselves from risks associated with contamination, adulteration, and misrepresentation of unregulated substances. In the current study, we aimed to (1) characterize the use of RTK and FTS among attendees of a 4-day music festival in Colorado and (2) qualitatively capture perceived barriers to using RTK and FTS within festival settings.

METHODS

We surveyed 227 music festival attendees on their use of drug checking tools (i.e., RTK and FTS) and behavior in response to drug checking. We also collected qualitative data on perceived barriers of using RTK and FTS within a festival setting using survey-based open-ended text response questions.

RESULTS

The percentage of participants having ever used RTK and FTS was 75.3% and 66.5% respectively. When asked how often participants ensure their drugs are tested prior to consumption, participants responding "always" or "most of the time" was 54.4% for use of RTK and 59.4% for use of FTS. Additionally, 60.8% of participants reported that they had never consumed a drug that reagent tested differently than expected and 87.9% of participants reported that they had never consumed a drug that tested positive for fentanyl. Perceived barriers to using RTK and FTS within a festival setting encompassed the following themes: (1) accessing testing materials (2) environmental or ecological barriers (3) legal concerns (4) social dynamics (5) lack of education/training and (6) limits of individual drug checking tools.

CONCLUSIONS

RTK and FTS appear to empower festival attendees in the U.S. to make informed decisions related to their substance use. However, there is a critical need to reduce barriers associated with drug checking for this at-risk population.

摘要

背景

在电子舞曲(EDM)活动中,多种物质混合使用的情况很常见,当吸毒者不知道其毒品样本的成分时,与多种物质混合使用相关的危害可能会加剧。试剂检测试剂盒(RTK)和芬太尼检测试纸(FTS)是两种有效的毒品检测工具,吸毒者可用来保护自己免受与不受管制物质的污染、掺假和误传相关的风险。在本研究中,我们旨在:(1)描述科罗拉多州一个为期4天的音乐节参与者对RTK和FTS的使用情况;(2)定性获取在音乐节环境中使用RTK和FTS的感知障碍。

方法

我们对227名音乐节参与者进行了调查,了解他们对毒品检测工具(即RTK和FTS)的使用情况以及对毒品检测的反应行为。我们还使用基于调查的开放式文本回答问题,收集了关于在音乐节环境中使用RTK和FTS的感知障碍的定性数据。

结果

曾经使用过RTK和FTS的参与者百分比分别为75.3%和66.5%。当被问及参与者在消费前确保对毒品进行检测的频率时,回答“总是”或“大部分时间”的参与者中,使用RTK的为54.4%,使用FTS的为59.4%。此外,60.8%的参与者报告称,他们从未吸食过试剂检测结果与预期不同的毒品,87.9%的参与者报告称,他们从未吸食过芬太尼检测呈阳性的毒品。在音乐节环境中使用RTK和FTS的感知障碍包括以下主题:(1)获取检测材料;(2)环境或生态障碍;(3)法律问题;(4)社会动态;(5)缺乏教育/培训;(6)个人毒品检测工具的局限性。

结论

RTK和FTS似乎使美国的音乐节参与者能够就其物质使用做出明智的决定。然而,迫切需要减少与针对这一高危人群的毒品检测相关的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/11963508/e2c6c4af4b2a/12954_2025_1181_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验