Suppr超能文献

动物发声中的非线性现象:它们反映的是声音控制的替代功能模式、质量或状态的“泄露”线索,还是两者兼而有之?

Nonlinear phenomena in animal vocalizations: do they reflect alternative functional modes of voice control, 'leaked' cues to quality or condition, or both?

作者信息

Rendall Drew

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, E3B 5A3.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Apr 3;380(1923):20240010. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0010.

Abstract

Nonlinear phenomena (NLP) in animal vocalizations typically present as abrupt departures from normative controlled voicing. They occur most commonly in loud vocalizations, often in contexts of high arousal, including alarm, aggression, fear or distress, or in elaborate displays of territory or competitive ability. They therefore invite interpretation as 'mistakes' that evince loss of vocal control resulting from effortful, emotional 'over-driving' of the vocal system. However, vocal over-driving may be more flexible and purposeful, representing an alternative functional mode of voice control if NLP can benefit signallers in some contexts. The latter perspective is first elaborated with examples from non-human primates before turning to cases where NLP truly do evince loss of vocal control that may then 'leak' cues to signaller quality or condition. To support future frameworks to study and understand the different domains where NLP occur, a functional distinction is emphasized that turns on whether high-amplitude, effortful voicing-which inherently predisposes NLP-is at the discretion of the signaller such that the focus is on the adaptive of NLP, or whether effortful voicing is effectively forced upon signallers by other dictates of the context itself, changing the focus to being the adaptive of NLP.This article is part of the theme issue 'Nonlinear phenomena in vertebrate vocalizations: mechanisms and communicative functions'.

摘要

动物发声中的非线性现象(NLP)通常表现为与规范的受控发声突然背离。它们最常出现在大声发声中,通常是在高度兴奋的情境下,包括警报、攻击、恐惧或痛苦,或者在精心展示领地或竞争能力时。因此,它们被解释为“错误”,表明由于对发声系统进行费力的、情绪化的“过度驱动”而导致发声控制丧失。然而,如果NLP在某些情况下对信号发出者有益,那么发声过度驱动可能更具灵活性和目的性,代表了一种替代的声音控制功能模式。在转向NLP确实表明发声控制丧失的情况(这种丧失可能会“泄露”信号发出者质量或状态的线索)之前,先通过非人类灵长类动物的例子详细阐述后一种观点。为了支持未来研究和理解NLP出现的不同领域的框架,强调了一种功能上的区别,即高振幅、费力的发声(这种发声本身就容易引发NLP)是由信号发出者自行决定,从而将重点放在NLP的适应性上,还是这种费力的发声实际上是由情境本身的其他因素强加给信号发出者的,从而将重点转变为NLP的适应性。本文是主题为“脊椎动物发声中的非线性现象:机制与交流功能”的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84d6/11966166/e72f37e05096/rstb.2024.0010.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验