• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黄瓜还是葡萄?——多媒体学习中的情境效应

Cucumber or grapes?-Context effects in multimedia learning.

作者信息

Seufert Tina, Magner Ulrike, von Randow Jurij

机构信息

Department for Learning and Instruction, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1480935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1480935. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1480935
PMID:40177049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11961943/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The multimedia principle states that learning with text and pictures is better than learning with text only. It might also depend on the context, in particular on the material the neighbour is learning with - which might look much more interesting.

METHODS

Therefore, in our experiments ( = 48; 47) we analysed whether learning outcomes, situational interest and extraneous load depend on the learning material (text versus text with pictures) and the context (the neighbour learns with either the same or different material). In the second study, we additionally analysed the influence of the learner's affective state. In particular, we analysed with concurrent hypotheses whether affect is a consequence of material and context, whether effects of material and context on learning outcomes and interest are mediated by negative affect, or whether negative affect prior to learning is a moderator of material and context effects.

RESULTS

The multimedia effect was replicated for all dependent variables. This is particularly interesting because in classical multimedia design studies the effect has only been shown for learning outcomes. The fact that the addition of pictures also has a positive effect on situational interest and on the experienced extraneous load is of additional interest. The interaction between material and context was significant for extraneous load (Exp.1) and for situational interest (Exp.2). The role of affect could not be clarified.

DISCUSSION

Overall, it seems relevant to consider not only the learning material, but also the context in which the material is provided. Even if the effects of context are not consistent for all learning parameters, situational interest was strongly influenced by context when inequality was particularly salient.

摘要

引言

多媒体原则表明,图文并茂的学习效果优于单纯的文字学习。这可能还取决于具体情境,特别是邻域所使用的学习材料——它可能看起来更有趣。

方法

因此,在我们的实验中(实验1 = 48;实验2 = 47),我们分析了学习成果、情境兴趣和无关负荷是否取决于学习材料(文字与图文结合)以及情境(邻域使用相同或不同的材料进行学习)。在第二项研究中,我们还分析了学习者情感状态的影响。具体而言,我们通过并发假设分析情感是否是材料和情境的结果,材料和情境对学习成果及兴趣的影响是否由负面情感介导,或者学习前的负面情感是否是材料和情境效应的调节因素。

结果

所有因变量均重现了多媒体效应。这一点尤为有趣,因为在经典的多媒体设计研究中,该效应仅在学习成果方面得到证实。图片的添加对情境兴趣和所体验到的无关负荷也有积极影响,这一事实更具研究价值。材料与情境之间的交互作用在无关负荷方面(实验1)和情境兴趣方面(实验2)均显著。情感的作用尚无法明确。

讨论

总体而言,不仅考虑学习材料,还考虑提供材料的情境似乎很有必要。即使情境对所有学习参数的影响并不一致,但当差异特别显著时,情境兴趣会受到情境的强烈影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/4992fe31a61f/fpsyg-16-1480935-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/601fb3977e85/fpsyg-16-1480935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/57a9f6f94c48/fpsyg-16-1480935-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/b4df464137dd/fpsyg-16-1480935-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/d86efc9fe3ca/fpsyg-16-1480935-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/4992fe31a61f/fpsyg-16-1480935-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/601fb3977e85/fpsyg-16-1480935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/57a9f6f94c48/fpsyg-16-1480935-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/b4df464137dd/fpsyg-16-1480935-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/d86efc9fe3ca/fpsyg-16-1480935-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/11961943/4992fe31a61f/fpsyg-16-1480935-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Cucumber or grapes?-Context effects in multimedia learning.黄瓜还是葡萄?——多媒体学习中的情境效应
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1480935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1480935. eCollection 2025.
2
Self-regulated learning from illustrated text: Eye movement modelling to support use and regulation of cognitive processes during learning from multimedia.基于插图文本的自我调节学习:眼动建模在多媒体学习中支持认知过程的使用和调节。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2018 Mar;88(1):80-94. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12175. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
3
Multimedia design for learner interest and achievement: a visual guide to pharmacology.为提升学习者兴趣与成绩的多媒体设计:药理学视觉指南
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05077-y.
4
I am Alexa, your virtual tutor!: The effects of Amazon Alexa's text-to-speech voice enthusiasm in a multimedia learning environment.我是Alexa,你的虚拟导师!:亚马逊Alexa的文本转语音语音热情在多媒体学习环境中的影响。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(2):1455-1489. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11255-6. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
5
The Interaction Between Text Modality and the Learner's Modality Preference Influences Comprehension and Cognitive Load.文本模态与学习者模态偏好之间的相互作用会影响理解和认知负荷。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 9;10:2820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02820. eCollection 2019.
6
Learning From Instructional Videos: Learner Gender Does Matter; Speaker Gender Does Not.从教学视频中学习:学习者性别有影响;讲解者性别无影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:655720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655720. eCollection 2021.
7
Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student's situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study.不同虚拟患者教学/学习方法对学生情境兴趣和认知负荷的影响:一项比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03831-8.
8
Exploring the interplay of information relevance and colorfulness in multimedia learning.探索多媒体学习中信息相关性与丰富性之间的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 29;15:1393113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1393113. eCollection 2024.
9
Which Tools in Multimedia Are Best for Learning Outcomes? A Study Grounded in Cognitive Load Structures.多媒体中的哪些工具最有利于学习成果?一项基于认知负荷结构的研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 2;12:545335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.545335. eCollection 2021.
10
Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing.多媒体教学与认知负荷理论:模态与提示的影响
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Mar;74(Pt 1):71-81. doi: 10.1348/000709904322848824.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load.两种测量内在、无关和相关认知负荷的工具的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 16;8:1997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997. eCollection 2017.
2
Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.信度系数α的元分析
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):306-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.306.
3
Monkeys reject unequal pay.猴子拒绝不公平的报酬。
Nature. 2003 Sep 18;425(6955):297-9. doi: 10.1038/nature01963.
4
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.积极和消极情绪简短测量方法的编制与验证:PANAS量表
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.