• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信度系数α的元分析

Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.

作者信息

Rodriguez Michael C, Maeda Yukiko

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):306-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.306.

DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.306
PMID:16953707
Abstract

The meta-analysis of coefficient alpha across many studies is becoming more common in psychology by a methodology labeled reliability generalization. Existing reliability generalization studies have not used the sampling distribution of coefficient alpha for precision weighting and other common meta-analytic procedures. A framework is provided for a statistically grounded meta-analysis of coefficient alpha using its sampling distribution. Two empirical examples are offered to illustrate these methods, and limitations of reliability generalization are described.

摘要

通过一种名为信度泛化的方法,对众多研究中的信度系数α进行元分析在心理学领域正变得越来越普遍。现有的信度泛化研究尚未使用信度系数α的抽样分布进行精确加权及其他常见的元分析程序。本文提供了一个基于统计的框架,用于使用信度系数α的抽样分布对其进行元分析。给出了两个实证例子来说明这些方法,并描述了信度泛化的局限性。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.信度系数α的元分析
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):306-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.306.
2
Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.双变量相关性的Meta分析区间估计。
Psychol Methods. 2008 Sep;13(3):173-81. doi: 10.1037/a0012868.
3
Psychometric inferences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coefficients.元分析可靠性和内部一致性系数的心理计量推断。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Dec;15(4):386-97. doi: 10.1037/a0019626.
4
Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure.校正荟萃分析中的间接范围限制:检验一种新的荟萃分析程序。
Psychol Methods. 2006 Dec;11(4):416-38. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.416.
5
Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.荟萃分析中的固定效应模型与随机效应模型:模型特性及结果差异的实证比较
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 Feb;62(Pt 1):97-128. doi: 10.1348/000711007X255327. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
6
Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability.变系数元分析方法用于 alpha 可靠性。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Dec;15(4):368-85. doi: 10.1037/a0020142.
7
Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model.更新元分析研究结果:贝叶斯方法与医学模型
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):297-308. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.297.
8
A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels.关于使用α系数和分层α系数来估计由项目集组成的测试的信度的说明。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 Nov;61(Pt 2):515-25. doi: 10.1348/000711005X72485.
9
Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.直接和间接范围限制对荟萃分析方法及结果的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 May;91(3):594-612. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594.
10
The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中统计检验的效能。
Psychol Methods. 2001 Sep;6(3):203-17.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta: A meta-analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) in the context of health professions education.元分析:健康职业教育背景下元认知意识量表(MAI)的元分析及心理测量学评估
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Aug;18(8):786-801. doi: 10.1002/ase.70085. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
2
Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the Climate Change Worry Scale.气候变化担忧量表的可靠性概括性元分析。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1590126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1590126. eCollection 2025.
3
The balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest as clinical tools to assess balance control across different populations: A reliability generalization meta-analysis.
平衡评估系统测试(BESTest)、迷你BESTest和简易BESTest作为评估不同人群平衡控制的临床工具:一项可靠性概括性元分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 3;20(4):e0318302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318302. eCollection 2025.
4
Cucumber or grapes?-Context effects in multimedia learning.黄瓜还是葡萄?——多媒体学习中的情境效应
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1480935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1480935. eCollection 2025.
5
The Bergen Facebook addiction scale: a reliability generalization meta-analysis.卑尔根Facebook成瘾量表:一项信度概括性元分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1444039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1444039. eCollection 2024.
6
Impact of station number and duration time per station on the reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores: a systematic review and meta-analysis.站点数量及每个站点持续时间对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)分数可靠性的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06691-0.
7
A meta-analysis assessing reliability of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: Implications for compulsive eating and obesity.一项评估耶鲁食物成瘾量表可靠性的荟萃分析:对强迫性进食和肥胖的影响。
Obes Rev. 2025 Apr;26(4):e13881. doi: 10.1111/obr.13881. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
8
A Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Second Language Listening Tests (1991-2022).第二语言听力测试可靠性的元分析(1991 - 2022年)
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 25;14(8):746. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080746.
9
Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale for Metamphetamine Abusers: Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version.甲基苯丙胺滥用者复发风险评估量表:土耳其语版本的信效度研究
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Sep 1;33(3):156-162. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2023.23671. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Defining early education quality using CLASS-observed teacher-student interaction.利用《课堂评估计分系统》观察到的师生互动来界定早期教育质量。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1110419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110419. eCollection 2023.