Cooley Victoria, Fortner Renée Turzanski, Mukama Trasias, Naudin Sabine, Pala Valeria, Dossus Laure, Gram Inger T, Olsen Karina Standahl, Sánchez Maria-Jose, Israelsson Pernilla, Allen Naomi, Langseth Hilde, Kaaks Rudolf
Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Int J Cancer. 2025 Aug 1;157(3):480-489. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35428. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
The human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) remains the best available endometrial cancer (EC) biomarker; however, its discrimination between cases and cancer-free individuals is limited and might be improved when combined with other protein markers. We evaluated the discrimination capacity of 92 proteins as potential early detection biomarkers for EC in nested case-control studies in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) (63 cases, 123 controls) and Janus (75 cases, 146 controls) cohorts, evaluating blood samples taken ≤2 years prior to diagnosis. Proteins were measured with the Olink Target 96 Oncology II panel assays. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated using logistic regression. The discrimination between cases and controls of top-performing proteins was modest (EPIC: HE4, CA125, CAIX, and S100A4; Janus: HE4, CA125, FURIN, CXCL13, and IL6; AUC range: 0.65 [S100A4], 0.76 [HE4, EPIC] within 0 to <12 months of blood collection) and decreased as the time between blood draw and cancer diagnosis increased (12-24 months AUC range: 0.49 [S100A4], 0.69 [CA125, Janus]). The combination of these other markers with HE4 did not improve discrimination. HE4 and other candidate proteins had limited discrimination between EC cases and controls and hence do not appear to be useful for early detection of this disease in women at average population risk.
人附睾蛋白4(HE4)仍然是目前可用的最佳子宫内膜癌(EC)生物标志物;然而,它在病例与无癌个体之间的区分能力有限,与其他蛋白质标志物联合使用时可能会有所改善。我们在欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)(63例病例,123例对照)和雅努斯(Janus)(75例病例,146例对照)队列的巢式病例对照研究中,评估了92种蛋白质作为EC潜在早期检测生物标志物的区分能力,评估了在诊断前≤2年采集的血样。使用Olink Target 96 Oncology II面板检测法测量蛋白质。使用逻辑回归计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。表现最佳的蛋白质在病例与对照之间的区分能力一般(EPIC:HE4、CA125、CAIX和S100A4;Janus:HE4、CA125、弗林蛋白酶、CXCL13和IL6;AUC范围:0.65 [S100A4],0.76 [HE4,EPIC],采血时间在0至<12个月内),并且随着采血与癌症诊断之间时间的增加而降低(12 - 24个月AUC范围:0.49 [S100A4],0.69 [CA125,Janus])。这些其他标志物与HE4联合使用并未改善区分能力。HE4和其他候选蛋白质在EC病例与对照之间的区分能力有限,因此似乎对处于一般人群风险的女性早期检测这种疾病并无用处。