Harron Katie, Cavallaro Francesca, van der Meulen Jan, Kennedy Eilis, Gilbert Ruth
UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
The Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 3;20(4):e0320810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320810. eCollection 2025.
An intensive programme of home visiting, the Family Nurse Partnership (FNP), is received by around one in four first-time adolescent mothers in selected areas in England. During home visits, nurses support mothers to make choices about healthy pregnancies, improving child development, and fulfilling their own aspirations and ambitions. Evidence is needed of the wider effects of the FNP, including for mothers not enrolled in the programme (who might experience unintended effects). We evaluated child and maternal outcomes for all eligible mothers giving birth before, during, and after the period in which FNP was active in local areas.
We created a linked cohort of 237,185 eligible mothers, aged 13-19, who gave birth between April 2010 and March 2019, and who had a first antenatal booking appointment (or a date of 28 completed weeks of gestation, if missing) when FNP was active in their area. We used administrative hospital data to identify unplanned maternal/child hospitalisations up to 2 years after birth for children born and mothers delivering before, during and after FNP was active. Generalised linear models were used to adjust for background regional time trends, maternal characteristics, and clustering of outcomes within residential areas.
We found no evidence of differences in unplanned hospital admissions for children born during the FNP period (36.9% versus 36.0%, relative risk [RR] 1.01; 95% CI 0.99-1.02), or after FNP was active (37.1%, RR 1.0; 95% CI 0.95-1.06), compared with those born before FNP was active. There was no evidence of differences in child admissions for maltreatment/injury-related diagnoses or for maternal admissions for adversity-related diagnoses.
Child and maternal outcomes were similar before, during and after FNP active periods, suggesting that the FNP did not have a wider impact on outcomes in all eligible mothers, including those not participating in the FNP.
在英格兰的特定地区,约四分之一的首次生育的青少年母亲接受了一项强化的家访计划——家庭护士伙伴关系(FNP)。在家访过程中,护士帮助母亲们做出关于健康怀孕、促进儿童发育以及实现自身愿望和抱负的选择。需要有证据证明FNP产生的更广泛影响,包括对未参加该计划的母亲(她们可能会受到意外影响)的影响。我们评估了在当地FNP实施期间及前后分娩的所有符合条件的母亲的儿童和产妇结局。
我们创建了一个由237,185名符合条件的母亲组成的关联队列,这些母亲年龄在13至19岁之间,于2010年4月至2019年3月期间分娩,并且在FNP在其所在地区实施时进行了首次产前预约登记(或者如果缺少该信息,则为妊娠满28周的日期)。我们使用医院行政数据来确定在FNP实施之前、期间和之后出生的儿童以及分娩的母亲在出生后长达2年的非计划母婴住院情况。使用广义线性模型来调整背景区域时间趋势、母亲特征以及居民区结局的聚类情况。
我们没有发现证据表明,与FNP实施之前出生的儿童相比,在FNP实施期间出生的儿童(36.9%对36.0%,相对风险[RR]1.01;95%置信区间0.99 - 1.02)或在FNP实施之后出生的儿童(37.1%,RR 1.0;95%置信区间0.95 - 1.06)的非计划住院率存在差异。没有证据表明在与虐待/伤害相关诊断的儿童住院情况或与逆境相关诊断的母亲住院情况方面存在差异。
在FNP实施期间及前后,儿童和产妇结局相似,这表明FNP对所有符合条件的母亲(包括未参与FNP的母亲)的结局没有更广泛的影响。