Suppr超能文献

生物标志物作为创伤后应激障碍治疗效果的衡量指标及治疗结果预测指标的应用:一项系统综述。

The use of biomarkers as measures of PTSD treatment efficacy and predictors of treatment outcomes: A systematic review.

作者信息

Cao-Noya Jorge A, Canovas Cossette, Benuto Lorraine T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2025 Jun;118:102579. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102579. Epub 2025 Mar 30.

Abstract

The efficacy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments might be hampered by individual differences. In order to maximize treatment efficacy in existing and newly developed interventions, controlling for individual variables is essential in treatment research. Given the marked physiological correlates of PTSD, biomarkers represent a promising solution. Throughout the PTSD literature, biomarkers have been used to assess treatment effects and predict treatment outcomes. However, the wide variety of biomarkers studied, along with several conflicting results, hinder researchers' abilities to comprehensively interpret the results reported. This systematic review of the literature aimed to identify and classify all biomarkers used to assess the efficacy of PTSD interventions and identify pre-treatment biomarkers able to predict treatment outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 70 studies that assessed biomarkers sensitivity to treatment effects and 25 that used biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes. Well-established treatments and newly developed protocols were included. The results were classified and interpreted by biomarker type. Indicators of neuroanatomical structures and functions were the most commonly studied biomarkers, followed by markers of cardiac activation and glucocorticoid analytes. Cardiac activation markers, and concretely heart rate reactivity to trauma cues, showed the most consistent findings, serving as a valuable method to assess treatment effects across different populations and treatment modalities. Other biomarkers showed promising trends both as predictors of treatment outcomes and measures of treatment efficacy, although essential methodological differences significantly impacted the comparison across studies.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗的疗效可能会受到个体差异的影响。为了在现有和新开发的干预措施中最大限度地提高治疗效果,在治疗研究中控制个体变量至关重要。鉴于PTSD存在明显的生理相关性,生物标志物是一个很有前景的解决方案。在整个PTSD文献中,生物标志物已被用于评估治疗效果和预测治疗结果。然而,所研究的生物标志物种类繁多,加上一些相互矛盾的结果,阻碍了研究人员全面解释所报告结果的能力。本系统文献综述旨在识别和分类所有用于评估PTSD干预措施疗效的生物标志物,并识别能够预测治疗结果的治疗前生物标志物。按照PRISMA指南,我们识别出70项评估生物标志物对治疗效果敏感性的研究和25项使用生物标志物预测治疗结果的研究。纳入了成熟的治疗方法和新开发的方案。结果按生物标志物类型进行分类和解释。神经解剖结构和功能指标是研究最普遍的生物标志物,其次是心脏激活标志物和糖皮质激素分析物。心脏激活标志物,具体而言是对创伤线索的心率反应,显示出最一致的结果,是评估不同人群和治疗方式治疗效果的一种有价值的方法。其他生物标志物作为治疗结果的预测指标和治疗效果的衡量指标也显示出有前景的趋势,尽管基本的方法差异显著影响了跨研究的比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验