• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生系统主导的高危亲属早期同意及直接联系:试点研究结果

Health System-Led Early Consent and Direct Contact of At-Risk Relatives: Pilot Study Results.

作者信息

Henrikson Nora B, Scrol Aaron, Zepp Jamilyn M, Anderson Melissa L, Blasi Paula R, Ewing John J, Grafton Jane, Ralston James D, Fullerton Stephanie M, Leppig Kathleen A

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):150-162. doi: 10.1159/000545404. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1159/000545404
PMID:40179849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12074871/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

At-risk relatives of probands with genetic variants associated with hereditary cancer risk should receive cascade genetic testing. In the USA, probands are expected to notify their own at-risk relatives, but many relatives never learn of their risk, representing missed opportunity to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hereditary cancers. Direct contact of relatives could reach relatives not contacted by the proband. We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot evaluation of a direct contact intervention based on patient and family preferences. Here, we report the study's quantitative results, measured by proband and relative participation in the intervention follow-up survey.

METHODS

We recruited adults receiving genetic counseling for inherited cancer risk at one US integrated health system. A genetic counselor offered to contact at-risk relatives. We surveyed probands and relatives at study enrollment and 6-8 weeks and evaluated administrative data to assess the program's outreach to probands and relatives, its acceptability, and its limited efficacy.

RESULTS

We approached 148 probands before their genetic counseling appointment. Fifty-five (37%) consented to study participation. Of these, 31 completed genetic testing, 29 of whom provided consent to contact 101 relatives. Forty-four percent (n = 45) of relatives consented to be contacted by the study genetic counselor. Acceptability was high for both groups and no harms were reported. All relatives reached (n = 43) received their proband's test results, including 6 pathogenic/likely pathogenic findings.

CONCLUSION

A direct contact program was acceptable, reached at-risk relatives, and communicated proband test results. Direct contact with early consent of relatives holds promise for future research.

摘要

引言

携带与遗传性癌症风险相关基因变异的先证者的高危亲属应接受级联基因检测。在美国,先证者有望通知自己的高危亲属,但许多亲属从未得知自己的风险,这意味着失去了降低与遗传性癌症相关的发病率和死亡率的机会。直接联系亲属可以联系到先证者未联系的亲属。我们基于患者和家庭偏好对直接接触干预措施进行了单臂前瞻性试点评估。在此,我们报告该研究的定量结果,以先证者和亲属参与干预后续调查的情况来衡量。

方法

我们在美国一个综合医疗系统中招募了因遗传性癌症风险接受遗传咨询的成年人。一名遗传咨询师提出联系高危亲属。我们在研究入组时以及6至8周时对先证者和亲属进行了调查,并评估了行政数据,以评估该项目对先证者和亲属的宣传推广情况、可接受性及其有限的效果。

结果

在148名先证者进行遗传咨询预约前与他们进行了接触。其中55名(37%)同意参与研究。在这些人中,31人完成了基因检测,其中29人同意联系101名亲属。44%(n = 45)的亲属同意由研究遗传咨询师联系。两组的可接受性都很高,且未报告有不良影响。所有被联系到的亲属(n = 43)都收到了先证者的检测结果,包括6个致病/可能致病的结果。

结论

直接接触项目是可接受的,联系到了高危亲属,并传达了先证者的检测结果。在亲属早期同意的情况下进行直接接触有望用于未来的研究。

相似文献

1
Health System-Led Early Consent and Direct Contact of At-Risk Relatives: Pilot Study Results.卫生系统主导的高危亲属早期同意及直接联系:试点研究结果
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):150-162. doi: 10.1159/000545404. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Feasibility, acceptability, and limited efficacy of health system-led familial risk notification: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation.卫生系统主导的家族风险通知的可行性、可接受性及有限疗效:一项混合方法评估方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 9;8(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01142-9.
3
"I Didn't Have to Worry about It": Patient and Family Experiences with Health System Involvement in Notifying Relatives of Genetic Test Results.“我不必为此担心”:患者及其家属对健康系统参与通知亲属遗传检测结果的体验。
Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):150-160. doi: 10.1159/000541532. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
4
Patients' perspectives regarding health professionals contacting their relatives about genetic risk directly (with patient consent).患者对于医疗专业人员在获得患者同意后直接联系其亲属告知遗传风险的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Apr;33(4):485-495. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01764-y. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
5
A clinically structured and partnered approach to genetic testing in Trinidadian women with breast cancer and their families.特立尼达和多巴哥乳腺癌女性及其家族的临床结构化和合作式基因检测方法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5045-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
6
Use of a chatbot to increase uptake of cascade genetic testing.利用聊天机器人提高级联基因检测的利用率。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1219-1230. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1592. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
A family-based approach to cascade genetic testing in a pediatric cancer genetics clinic.基于家系的儿科癌症遗传诊所级联遗传检测方法。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00434-8.
8
Recruiting first-degree relatives for prevention research: a comparison of clinician and proband-led methods of contact in Crohn's disease.招募一级亲属进行预防研究:克罗恩病中临床医生主导与先证者主导的联系方法比较
Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Dec;14(12):1263-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201699. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
9
Factors affecting the implementation of cascade testing of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants in Japan.影响日本BRCA1或BRCA2致病性种系变异患者级联检测实施的因素。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70055. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70055.
10
Family communication matters: the impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results.家庭沟通很重要:告知亲属未分类变异体和无信息 DNA 检测结果的影响。
Genet Med. 2011 Apr;13(4):333-41. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318204cfed.

本文引用的文献

1
"I Didn't Have to Worry about It": Patient and Family Experiences with Health System Involvement in Notifying Relatives of Genetic Test Results.“我不必为此担心”:患者及其家属对健康系统参与通知亲属遗传检测结果的体验。
Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):150-160. doi: 10.1159/000541532. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Challenges and opportunities for Lynch syndrome cascade testing in the United States.美国林奇综合征级联检测面临的挑战与机遇
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):147-154. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00374-3. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: a review of barriers and breakthroughs.级联遗传检测在遗传性癌症综合征中的应用:障碍与突破的综述。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00373-4. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
4
The experience of receiving a letter from a cancer genetics clinic about risk for hereditary cancer.收到癌症遗传学诊所关于遗传性癌症风险的信件的体验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):539-544. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01551-9. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2024.美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南见解:遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺癌、卵巢癌和胰腺癌,2024年第2版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Oct;21(10):1000-1010. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0051.
6
Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public.卫生专业人员直接通知有遗传疾病风险的亲属(经患者同意):澳大利亚公众的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):98-108. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
7
Do people with hereditary cancer syndromes inform their at-risk relatives? A systematic review and meta-analysis.患有遗传性癌症综合征的人会告知他们有患病风险的亲属吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 17;2:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100138. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Cascade testing after exome sequencing: Retrospective analysis of linked family data at 2 US laboratories.外显子测序后的级联检测:2 家美国实验室的连锁家族数据的回顾性分析。
Genet Med. 2023 May;25(5):100818. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100818. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
9
Barriers to completion of cascade genetic testing: how can we improve the uptake of testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome?级联遗传检测完成障碍:我们如何提高遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征检测的采用率?
Fam Cancer. 2023 Apr;22(2):127-133. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00316-x. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
10
Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传性癌症综合征的级联检测:我们是否应该转向直系亲属接触?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4129-4143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00303. Epub 2022 Aug 12.