• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有遗传性癌症综合征的人会告知他们有患病风险的亲属吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Do people with hereditary cancer syndromes inform their at-risk relatives? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ahsan Muhammad Danyal, Levi Sarah R, Webster Emily M, Bergeron Hannah, Lin Jenny, Narayan Priyanka, Nelson Becky Baltich, Li Xuan, Fowlkes Rana K, Brewer Jesse T, Thomas Charlene, Christos Paul J, Chapman-Davis Eloise, Cantillo Evelyn, Holcomb Kevin, Sharaf Ravi N, Frey Melissa K

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 17;2:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100138. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100138
PMID:37214514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10194207/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate rates of familial disclosure of hereditary cancer syndrome information.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO no.: CRD42020134276). Key electronic databases were searched to identify studies evaluating hereditary cancer syndrome cascade relative disclosure. Eligible studies were subjected to meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Among 11,711 included relatives, 70% (95% CI 60 - 78%) were informed of their risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant; of 2,875 relatives informed of their risk who were evaluated for uptake of cascade testing, 43% (95% CI 27 - 61%) completed testing. Rates of disclosure were higher among female vs male relatives (79% [95% CI 73% - 84%] vs 67% [95% CI 57% - 75%]) and first-degree vs second-degree relatives (83% [95% CI 77% - 88%] vs 58% [95% CI 45 - 69%]).

CONCLUSION

Nearly one-third of at-risk relatives remain uninformed of their risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant. Even among those informed, fewer than half subsequently complete genetic testing, representing a critical missed opportunity for precision cancer prevention.

INNOVATION

Five studies evaluating interventions to improve disclosure rates were generally ineffective. Urgent work is needed to elucidate barriers to relative disclosure by probands to develop targeted interventions that can optimize proband-mediated cascade genetic testing rates.

摘要

目的

评估遗传性癌症综合征信息的家族披露率。

方法

根据PRISMA指南(PROSPERO编号:CRD42020134276)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了主要电子数据库,以确定评估遗传性癌症综合征级联相关披露情况的研究。对符合条件的研究进行荟萃分析。

结果

34项研究符合纳入标准。在11711名纳入的亲属中,70%(95%CI 60 - 78%)被告知其携带与癌症相关的致病变异的风险;在2875名被告知风险并接受级联检测评估的亲属中,43%(95%CI 27 - 61%)完成了检测。女性亲属的披露率高于男性亲属(79%[95%CI 73% - 84%]对67%[95%CI 57% - 75%]),一级亲属高于二级亲属(83%[95%CI 77% - 88%]对58%[95%CI 45 - 69%])。

结论

近三分之一的高危亲属仍未被告知其携带与癌症相关的致病变异的风险。即使在那些被告知的人中,随后完成基因检测的也不到一半,这代表着精准癌症预防中一个关键的错失机会。

创新点

五项评估改善披露率干预措施的研究总体上无效。迫切需要开展工作,以阐明先证者向亲属披露信息的障碍,从而制定有针对性的干预措施,优化先证者介导的级联基因检测率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/d29b7133bcc4/mmc3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/a580380d30e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/a81be158c0fa/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/f1e9317c4111/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/a2497145b027/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/4e03ac3473fe/mmc1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/035cbc04f1b3/mmc2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/d29b7133bcc4/mmc3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/a580380d30e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/a81be158c0fa/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/f1e9317c4111/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/a2497145b027/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/4e03ac3473fe/mmc1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/035cbc04f1b3/mmc2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbf/10194207/d29b7133bcc4/mmc3.jpg

相似文献

1
Do people with hereditary cancer syndromes inform their at-risk relatives? A systematic review and meta-analysis.患有遗传性癌症综合征的人会告知他们有患病风险的亲属吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 17;2:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100138. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传性癌症综合征的级联检测:我们是否应该转向直系亲属接触?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4129-4143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00303. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Direct letters to relatives at risk of hereditary cancer-study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial of healthcare-assisted versus family-mediated risk disclosure at Swedish cancer genetics clinics (DIRECT-study).直接致信有遗传性癌症风险的亲属 - 瑞典癌症遗传诊所开展医疗辅助与家庭介导风险披露的多中心随机对照试验方案(DIRECT 研究)
Trials. 2023 Dec 17;24(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07829-5.
4
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
5
Uptake of Cascade Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.级联遗传检测在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 1;67(4):702-710. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000895. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
6
Communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results and uptake of testing in relatives in a diverse Asian setting.在亚洲不同背景下,对 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因检测阳性结果及其亲属接受检测情况的沟通。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Jun;30(3):720-729. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1360. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌和林奇综合征的症状前基因检测应用:文献系统综述及对临床实践的启示
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z.
8
Low rates of cascade genetic testing among families with hereditary gynecologic cancer: An opportunity to improve cancer prevention.遗传性妇科癌症家族中级联遗传检测率低:改善癌症预防的机会。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
9
How to inform relatives at risk of hereditary diseases? A mixed-methods systematic review on patient attitudes.如何告知有遗传疾病风险的亲属?一项关于患者态度的混合方法系统评价
J Genet Couns. 2019 Oct;28(5):1042-1058. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1143. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Intention to Inform Relatives, Rates of Cascade Testing, and Preference for Patient-Mediated Communication in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome: The Swiss CASCADE Cohort.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌以及林奇综合征相关家庭中告知亲属的意愿、级联检测率和对患者介导沟通的偏好:瑞士级联队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;14(7):1636. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071636.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies.遗传咨询中的家庭沟通问题:过程研究的范围综述
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70067. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70067.
2
Genomic findings with familial implications: agenda setting in light of mainstreaming.具有家族性影响的基因组学发现:基于主流化的议程设定
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jan 10;5:4. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19128.1. eCollection 2025.
3
Health System-Led Early Consent and Direct Contact of At-Risk Relatives: Pilot Study Results.卫生系统主导的高危亲属早期同意及直接联系:试点研究结果

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing underrepresentation in genomics research through community engagement.通过社区参与解决基因组学研究中的代表性不足问题。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep 1;109(9):1563-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.08.005.
2
Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传性癌症综合征的级联检测:我们是否应该转向直系亲属接触?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4129-4143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00303. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Genetic Testing for All: Overcoming Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Genetic Testing.
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):150-162. doi: 10.1159/000545404. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
4
The Genetic Information and Family Testing (GIFT) study: trial design and protocol.基因信息与家庭检测(GIFT)研究:试验设计与方案
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13744-6.
5
Cascade genetic testing in hereditary cancer: exploring the boundaries of the Italian legal framework.遗传性癌症的级联基因检测:探索意大利法律框架的边界。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00430-y.
6
Liminality between direct and family-mediated contact in the communication of genetic information to at-risk relatives.在向高危亲属传递遗传信息时直接接触与家庭介导接触之间的阈限状态。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):477-478. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01605-y. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
The experience of receiving a letter from a cancer genetics clinic about risk for hereditary cancer.收到癌症遗传学诊所关于遗传性癌症风险的信件的体验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):539-544. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01551-9. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
8
Patients' perceptions and practices of informing relatives: a qualitative study within a randomised trial on healthcare-assisted risk disclosure.患者告知亲属的认知和实践:一项在医疗辅助风险披露随机试验中的定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Apr;32(4):448-455. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01544-8. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
9
Communication in genomic and precision medicine: Editorial - .基因组学与精准医学中的交流:编者按 -
PEC Innov. 2023 Jan 25;2:100126. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100126. eCollection 2023 Dec.
全民基因检测:克服卵巢癌基因检测中的差异
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-12. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_350292.
4
Pathogenic Variants in Less Familiar Cancer Susceptibility Genes: What Happens After Genetic Testing?不太常见的癌症易感基因中的致病变异:基因检测后会怎样?
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov;2:1-10. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00167.
5
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 1.2021.NCCN 指南®洞察:遗传/家族性高风险评估:结直肠癌,第 1.2021 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Oct 15;19(10):1122-1132. doi: 10.1164/jnccn.2021.0048.
6
Patient ethnicity and cascade genetic testing: a descriptive study of a publicly funded hereditary cancer program.患者种族和级联基因检测:一项公共资助的遗传性癌症计划的描述性研究。
Fam Cancer. 2022 Jul;21(3):369-374. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00270-0. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
7
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺癌、卵巢癌和胰腺癌,第 2.2021 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):77-102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.
8
Mechanisms to increase cascade testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: Impact of introducing standardized communication aids into genetic counseling.提高遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌级联检测的机制:将标准化沟通工具引入遗传咨询的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Sep;46(9):1835-1841. doi: 10.1111/jog.14366. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
9
Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.基于诊断后癌症基因检测的级联分析:一种替代基于人群的筛查方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1398-1408. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02010. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
Prospective Feasibility Trial of a Novel Strategy of Facilitated Cascade Genetic Testing Using Telephone Counseling.利用电话咨询促进级联基因检测的新策略的前瞻性可行性试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1389-1397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02005. Epub 2020 Jan 10.