Jones Susan M, Petritz Olivia A, Cassady Katherine R, Love Kim, Balko Julie A
Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Am J Vet Res. 2025 Apr 3;86(7). doi: 10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0361. Print 2025 Jul 1.
To compare the sedative effects of intranasal (IN) alfaxalone to IM alfaxalone with or without IM midazolam in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus).
A prospective, blinded, crossover study was performed on 8 healthy male cockatiels from February through April 2021. Birds randomly received 4 treatments with at least a 1-week washout period: alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg, IN (IN-A); alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg, IM, with (IM-AM) or without (IM-A) midazolam at 3 mg/kg, IM; and midazolam at 3 mg/kg, IM (IM-M). Time to recumbency and heart and respiratory rates were recorded. Ten minutes following administration, birds were restrained for sham 2-view radiographs and venipuncture. Following venipuncture, flumazenil at 0.1 mg/kg, IM, was administered (IM-AM and IM-M). Time to standing was recorded. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model, a mixed effects γ-regression model, and Cochran Q, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
No sedative effects were observed in IN-A. Recumbency was achieved in 0/8, 5/8, 8/8, and 0/8 birds in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Respiratory and heart rates remained within acceptable limits in all birds. Sham radiographs were acquired in 0/8, 1/8, 6/8, and 0/8 birds in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Venipuncture was successful in all birds with median lactate concentrations of 4.9, 2.4, 1.0, and 1.8 mmol/L in IN-A, IM-A, IM-AM, and IM-M, respectively. Median (range) time to standing after handling in IM-A and IM-AM was 8.8 (0 to 15.0) and 14.5 (0.6 to 15.5) min, respectively.
Intranasal alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg did not produce sedation.
Intramuscular alfaxalone at 15 mg/kg with midazolam at 3 mg/kg produced sedation in cockatiels.
比较鼻腔内(IN)给予阿法沙龙与肌肉注射(IM)阿法沙龙(联合或不联合IM咪达唑仑)对鸡尾鹦鹉(虎皮鹦鹉)的镇静效果。
于2021年2月至4月对8只健康雄性鸡尾鹦鹉进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、交叉研究。鸟类随机接受4种治疗,每种治疗之间至少有1周的洗脱期:15 mg/kg阿法沙龙,鼻腔内给药(IN-A);15 mg/kg阿法沙龙,肌肉注射,联合(IM-AM)或不联合(IM-A)3 mg/kg咪达唑仑,肌肉注射;3 mg/kg咪达唑仑,肌肉注射(IM-M)。记录卧倒时间、心率和呼吸频率。给药10分钟后,对鸟类进行假的双视图X线摄影和静脉穿刺约束。静脉穿刺后,肌肉注射0.1 mg/kg氟马西尼(IM-AM和IM-M)。记录站立时间。使用线性混合模型、混合效应γ回归模型以及Cochran Q检验、Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验对数据进行分析。
IN-A未观察到镇静效果。IN-A、IM-A、IM-AM和IM-M组中分别有0/8、5/8、8/8和0/8只鸟达到卧倒状态。所有鸟类的呼吸和心率均保持在可接受范围内。IN-A、IM-A、IM-AM和IM-M组中分别有0/8、1/8、6/8和0/8只鸟成功进行了假X线摄影。所有鸟类静脉穿刺均成功,IN-A、IM-A、IM-AM和IM-M组的乳酸中位数浓度分别为4.9、2.4、1.0和