Development and internal validation of an interpretable risk prediction model for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in China.

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common and serious complication of diabetes, which can lead to foot deformity, ulceration, and even amputation. Early identification is crucial, as more than half of DPN patients are asymptomatic in the early stage. This study aimed to develop and validate multiple risk prediction models for DPN in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to apply the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method to interpret the best-performing model and identify key risk factors for DPN.

DESIGN

A single-centre retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Hainan.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records of patients with diabetes admitted between 1 January 2021 and 28 March 2023. After data preprocessing, 73 variables were retained for baseline analysis. Feature selection was performed using univariate analysis combined with recursive feature elimination (RFE). The dataset was split into training and test sets in an 8:2 ratio, with the training set balanced via the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Six machine learning algorithms were applied to develop prediction models for DPN. Hyperparameters were optimised using grid search with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using various metrics on the test set, and the SHAP method was used to interpret the best-performing model.

RESULTS

The study included 3343 T2DM inpatients, with a median age of 60 years (IQR 53-69), and 88.6% (2962/3343) had DPN. The RFE method identified 12 key factors for model construction. Among the six models, XGBoost showed the best predictive performance, achieving an area under the curve of 0.960, accuracy of 0.927, precision of 0.969, recall of 0.948, F1-score of 0.958 and a G-mean of 0.850 on the test set. The SHAP analysis highlighted C reactive protein, total bile acids, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, age and lipoprotein(a) as the top five predictors of DPN.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning approach successfully established a DPN risk prediction model with excellent performance. The use of the interpretable SHAP method could enhance the model's clinical applicability.