Paulo Nicolas, Kimmoun Antoine, Hajage David, Hubert Pierre, Levy David, Pineton de Chambrun Marc, Chommeloux Juliette, Saura Ouriel, Del Marmol Grégoire, Moyon Quentin, Hékimian Guillaume, Gautier Melchior, Luyt Charles Edouard, Lebreton Guillaume, Levy Bruno, Combes Alain, Schmidt Matthieu
AP-HP, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 Boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Institut Lorrain du Cœur Et Des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, FCRIN-INICRCT, Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, U1116, Nancy, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01457-9.
Preliminary evidence from small, single-center studies suggests levosimendan may improve the likelihood of successful venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) weaning in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, the literature is limited and presents conflicting results. We aimed to assess the benefits of levosimendan on VA-ECMO for time to successful ECMO weaning, using a pragmatic and rigorous definition of successful VA-ECMO weaning in patients with potential for cardiac function recovery.
A retrospective bicentric study over 6 years was conducted, including patients who received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Patients with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock or end-stage chronic heart failure were excluded. Patients receiving levosimendan while on VA-ECMO were matched to those not receiving levosimendan during the same period, based on pre-specified variables and time from ECMO initiation. The primary endpoint was successful VA-ECMO weaning, defined as survival without death, heart transplantation, or LVAD within 30 days after VA-ECMO withdrawal.
Over the study period, 320 patients treated with VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock were included, of whom 68 received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Propensity score matching yielded 47 unique pairs of patients with comparable characteristics. After matching, successful ECMO weaning was achieved in 16 out of 47 patients (34%) in the no-levosimendan group and 21 out of 47 patients (45%) in the levosimendan group (sHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.77-2.70]; P = 0.25). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of bridge-to-heart transplant, LVAD, or death. Left ventricular ejection fraction and aortic velocity time integral improved significantly after levosimendan in all patients, regardless of their VA-ECMO weaning status.
In patients with non-postoperative cardiogenic shock supported by peripheral VA-ECMO, levosimendan was not associated with increased rates of successful VA-ECMO weaning or improved 30-day and 6-month bridge-free survival. Results from double-blinded randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to clarify the effectiveness and optimal timing of levosimendan in this specific population.
小型单中心研究的初步证据表明,左西孟旦可能提高心源性休克患者成功撤掉静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)的可能性。然而,相关文献有限且结果相互矛盾。我们旨在评估左西孟旦对VA-ECMO用于成功撤掉ECMO时间的益处,采用实用且严格的成功撤掉VA-ECMO的定义,用于心功能有恢复潜力的患者。
进行了一项为期6年的回顾性双中心研究,纳入在ECMO治疗期间接受左西孟旦的患者。排除心脏术后心源性休克或终末期慢性心力衰竭患者。基于预先设定的变量和从开始ECMO治疗的时间,将在VA-ECMO期间接受左西孟旦的患者与同期未接受左西孟旦的患者进行匹配。主要终点是成功撤掉VA-ECMO,定义为在撤掉VA-ECMO后30天内无死亡、心脏移植或左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入的存活。
在研究期间,纳入了320例因难治性心源性休克接受VA-ECMO治疗的患者,其中68例在ECMO治疗期间接受了左西孟旦。倾向评分匹配产生了47对具有可比特征的独特患者对。匹配后,未接受左西孟旦组的47例患者中有16例(34%)成功撤掉ECMO,接受左西孟旦组的47例患者中有21例(45%)成功撤掉ECMO(标准化危险比,1.45[95%置信区间,0.77 - 2.70];P = 0.25)。同样,两组在桥接心脏移植、LVAD或死亡方面无显著差异。无论VA-ECMO撤机状态如何,所有患者在使用左西孟旦后左心室射血分数和主动脉速度时间积分均显著改善。
在接受外周VA-ECMO支持的非术后心源性休克患者中,左西孟旦与成功撤掉VA-ECMO的发生率增加或30天和6个月无桥接生存改善无关。迫切需要双盲随机对照试验的结果来阐明左西孟旦在这一特定人群中的有效性和最佳时机。