He Hua, Wu Yanhua, Jia Zhifang, Zhang Yangyu, Pan Yuchen, Zhang Yuzheng, Su Kaisheng, Cui Yingnan, Sun Yuanlin, Li Dongming, Lv Haiyong, Yi Jiaxin, Wang Yuehui, Kou Changgui, Sun Xiaofeng, Jiang Jing
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1, Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Cancer Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95795-0.
This study explores new screening strategies to enhance liver cancer screening effectiveness. In a prospective study, 2605 participants underwent baseline, 6-months self-reported, and 1-year follow-up screenings using abdominal ultrasonography, AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP. The results demonstrated the GALADUS protocol exhibited superior performance with higher AUC (0.935 vs. 0.836; DeLong P < 0.001), sensitivity (91.0% vs. 70.8%; P < 0.001), detection (3.1% vs. 2.4%; P < 0.001), and early diagnosis rates (64.2% vs. 58.7%) compared to the AFP/US protocol. Notably, among individuals with an aMAP score ≥ 60, GALADUS had significantly outperformed AFP/US in AUC (0.923 vs. 0.826; DeLong P < 0.001), sensitivity (94.2% vs. 69.6%; P < 0.001), detection (9.7% vs. 7.2%; P < 0.001), and early diagnosis rates (63.1% vs. 54.2%). However, for those with an aMAP score < 60, GALADUS offered no significant advantages. Introducing the "aMAP triage" protocol, combining GALADUS for aMAP ≥ 60 and AFP/US for aMAP < 60, further enhanced AUC to 0.925 (DeLong P < 0.001), improved sensitivity by 19.1% (89.9% vs. 70.8%; P < 0.001), and increased detection (3.1% vs. 2.4%; P < 0.001) and early diagnosis rates (65.0% vs. 58.7%), being cost-effective compared to GALADUS. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of a stratified precision screening strategy in identifying high-risk individuals, applying tailored early detection protocols to improve liver cancer screening efficacy.
本研究探索新的筛查策略以提高肝癌筛查的有效性。在一项前瞻性研究中,2605名参与者接受了基线检查、6个月自我报告检查以及1年随访检查,检查项目包括腹部超声、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、甲胎蛋白异质体L3(AFP-L3%)和异常凝血酶原(DCP)。结果表明,与AFP/超声检查方案相比,GALADUS方案表现更优,曲线下面积(AUC)更高(0.935对0.836;德龙检验P<0.001),灵敏度更高(91.0%对70.8%;P<0.001),检出率更高(3.1%对2.4%;P<0.001),早期诊断率更高(64.2%对58.7%)。值得注意的是,在aMAP评分≥60的个体中,GALADUS在AUC(0.923对0.826;德龙检验P<0.001)、灵敏度(94.2%对69.6%;P<0.001)、检出率(9.7%对7.2%;P<0.001)和早期诊断率(63.1%对54.2%)方面显著优于AFP/超声检查方案。然而,对于aMAP评分<60的个体,GALADUS没有显著优势。引入“aMAP分诊”方案,即aMAP≥60时采用GALADUS方案,aMAP<60时采用AFP/超声检查方案,进一步将AUC提高到0.925(德龙检验P<0.001),灵敏度提高了19.1%(89.9%对70.8%;P<0.001),检出率提高(3.1%对2.4%;P<0.001),早期诊断率提高(65.0%对58.7%),与GALADUS方案相比具有成本效益。总之,本研究强调了分层精准筛查策略在识别高危个体、应用定制化早期检测方案以提高肝癌筛查效果方面的潜力。