Kong Qingzu, Liu Qian, Gao Feng, Wang Xiang, Wang Zhiyan, Xiao Chuman, Zhang Xinyue, Yu Qianmei, Fan Jie, Zhu Xiongzhao
Medical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.139 Renmin Middle Road, Furong District, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China.
Medical Psychological Institute of Central South University, Central South University, Changsha, China.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 3;13(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02662-8.
This study examined the computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory (VWM) in MDD, focusing on memory precision while exploring potential sex differences. 159 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients and 67 healthy controls (HC) completed the color delay estimation task to measure their VWM. The mainstream models of VWM were compared, and the variable-precision (VP) model was the best fit for our data. The Bayesian ANCOVA was used to compare the differences between groups (MDD & HC) and sexes (male & female). Results revealed that MDD had worse memory precision than HC (BF = 103.872, decisive evidence for H). Specifically, they had larger resource allocation variability (BF = 19.421, strong evidence for H), indicating that they distributed memory resources more unevenly across different items than HC. In addition, females had better memory precision than males (BF = 10.548, strong evidence for H). More specifically, they had more initial resources during the color delay estimation task (BF = 6.003, substantial evidence for H) than males. These findings highlight the critical role of diminished precision, specifically, larger resource allocation variability, in impaired VWM in MDD. Meanwhile, these findings highlight sex differences in memory precision and initial resources of VWM.
本研究考察了重度抑郁症(MDD)患者视觉工作记忆(VWM)的计算认知机制,重点关注记忆精度,同时探究潜在的性别差异。159名重度抑郁症(MDD)患者和67名健康对照者(HC)完成了颜色延迟估计任务,以测量他们的视觉工作记忆。对视觉工作记忆的主流模型进行了比较,可变精度(VP)模型最适合我们的数据。采用贝叶斯协方差分析来比较组间(MDD与HC)和性别(男性与女性)之间的差异。结果显示,MDD患者的记忆精度比HC组差(BF = 103.872,对假设H的决定性证据)。具体而言,他们的资源分配变异性更大(BF = 19.421,对假设H的有力证据),这表明他们在不同项目之间分配记忆资源的方式比HC组更不均衡。此外,女性的记忆精度比男性好(BF = 10.548,对假设H的有力证据)。更具体地说,在颜色延迟估计任务中,她们比男性拥有更多的初始资源(BF = 6.003,对假设H的充分证据)。这些发现突出了精度降低,特别是更大的资源分配变异性,在MDD患者视觉工作记忆受损中的关键作用。同时,这些发现突出了视觉工作记忆在记忆精度和初始资源方面的性别差异。