Perros Tash, O'Keefe Mark, Mwitari James, Gichane Lewis, Puzzolo Elisa, Pope Daniel
Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, UK.
UCL Open Environ. 2025 Mar 26;7:e3034. doi: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3034. eCollection 2025.
With a wide range of stoves and appliances available in the ever-evolving Kenyan cooking market, it is important to understand which options are the most cost, time and energy efficient to use. This information can help households to make more informed decisions about their energy use and policy makers to better understand which solutions to promote. Despite its importance, the existing literature offers scant evidence to guide optimal stove and fuel choices. In this research, we utilised controlled cooking tests to investigate the fuel required to cook six regularly prepared dishes on 10 prevalent stove and fuel combinations (including liquified petroleum gas, ethanol, charcoal, kerosene and electric appliances). We also tested the efficiency improvements from pre-soaking beans and using stovetop pressure cookers. We collected primary fuel cost data from across Nairobi in June 2023 and collated historical fuel prices from secondary sources spanning 2019-2023. The prices of liquified petroleum gas, charcoal and kerosene varied considerably by variables such as brand and location, whereas ethanol and on-grid electricity were more stable. The electric pressure cooker was the most cost- and energy-efficient device. For liquified petroleum gas and charcoal, combining pre-soaking beans with a pressure cooker substantially reduced fuel consumption, but was still costlier than the electric pressure cooker. The longitudinal comparison highlighted the dynamic nature of fuel prices in Kenya and how a household's cost-optimal cooking stack can change at short notice. These findings demonstrate how comparative affordability varies both temporally and spatially and can be heavily affected by wider market and policy incentives.
在不断发展的肯尼亚烹饪市场中,有各种各样的炉灶和电器可供选择,了解哪些选择在成本、时间和能源利用方面最具效率非常重要。这些信息可以帮助家庭在能源使用方面做出更明智的决策,并帮助政策制定者更好地理解应推广哪些解决方案。尽管其重要性,但现有文献几乎没有提供指导最佳炉灶和燃料选择的证据。在本研究中,我们利用受控烹饪测试来调查在10种常见的炉灶和燃料组合(包括液化石油气、乙醇、木炭、煤油和电器)上烹饪六道常规菜肴所需的燃料。我们还测试了预先浸泡豆类和使用炉灶压力锅带来的效率提升。我们于2023年6月收集了内罗毕各地的主要燃料成本数据,并整理了2019 - 2023年二手来源的历史燃料价格。液化石油气、木炭和煤油的价格因品牌和地点等变量而有很大差异,而乙醇和并网电力则更为稳定。电压力锅是最具成本效益和能源效率的设备。对于液化石油气和木炭,将预先浸泡豆类与压力锅结合使用可大幅降低燃料消耗,但仍比电压力锅成本更高。纵向比较突出了肯尼亚燃料价格的动态性质,以及家庭成本最优的烹饪组合如何在短时间内发生变化。这些发现表明,相对可承受性在时间和空间上都有所不同,并且可能受到更广泛的市场和政策激励措施的严重影响。