• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布雷达国际微创胰腺手术验证性欧洲指南(EGUMIPS)。

The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS).

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.

Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006
PMID:37450702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10727198/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and update evidence-based and consensus-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS), including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, is complex and technically demanding. Minimizing the risk for patients requires stringent, evidence-based guidelines. Since the International Miami Guidelines on MIPS in 2019, new developments and key publications have been reported, necessitating an update.

METHODS

Evidence-based guidelines on 22 topics in 8 domains were proposed: terminology, indications, patients, procedures, surgical techniques and instrumentation, assessment tools, implementation and training, and artificial intelligence. The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS, September 2022) used the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology to assess the evidence and develop guideline recommendations, the Delphi method to establish consensus on the recommendations among the Expert Committee, and the AGREE II-GRS tool for guideline quality assessment and external validation by a Validation Committee.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 European experts, 6 international experts, 22 international Validation Committee members, 11 Jury Committee members, 18 Research Committee members, and 121 registered attendees of the 2-day meeting were involved in the development and validation of the guidelines. In total, 98 recommendations were developed, including 33 on laparoscopic, 34 on robotic, and 31 on general MIPS, covering 22 topics in 8 domains. Out of 98 recommendations, 97 reached at least 80% consensus among the experts and congress attendees, and all recommendations were externally validated by the Validation Committee.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGUMIPS evidence-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic MIPS can be applied in current clinical practice to provide guidance to patients, surgeons, policy-makers, and medical societies.

摘要

目的

制定和更新腹腔镜和机器人胰腺手术的循证和共识指南。

摘要背景数据

微创胰腺手术(MIPS),包括腹腔镜和机器人手术,具有复杂性和技术要求高的特点。为了降低患者的风险,需要严格的循证指南。自 2019 年国际迈阿密 MIPS 指南以来,已经报告了新的发展和关键出版物,因此需要进行更新。

方法

针对 8 个领域的 22 个主题提出了循证指南:术语、适应证、患者、手术、手术技术和仪器、评估工具、实施和培训、人工智能。2022 年 9 月,意大利布雷西亚国际验证的微创胰腺手术欧洲指南(EGUMIPS)采用苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)方法评估证据并制定指南建议,采用德尔菲法在专家委员会中就建议达成共识,并采用 AGREE II-GRS 工具由验证委员会对指南质量进行评估和外部验证。

结果

共有 27 名欧洲专家、6 名国际专家、22 名国际验证委员会成员、11 名评审委员会成员、18 名研究委员会成员和 121 名为期两天的会议注册参加者参与了指南的制定和验证。总共制定了 98 条建议,其中 33 条涉及腹腔镜手术,34 条涉及机器人手术,31 条涉及一般 MIPS,涵盖 8 个领域的 22 个主题。在 98 条建议中,有 97 条建议在专家和与会代表中至少达到了 80%的共识,所有建议均由验证委员会进行了外部验证。

结论

EGUMIPS 关于腹腔镜和机器人 MIPS 的循证指南可应用于当前的临床实践,为患者、外科医生、决策者和医学协会提供指导。

相似文献

1
The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS).布雷达国际微创胰腺手术验证性欧洲指南(EGUMIPS)。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
2
The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection.《迈阿密微创胰腺切除术循证指南》。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):1-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590.
3
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.《南安普敦腹腔镜肝手术共识指南:从适应证到实施》。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
4
Application of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an Italian survey.微创胰腺手术的应用:一项意大利的调查。
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0535-3. Epub 2018 May 16.
5
The Italian National Registry for minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an initiative of the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Pancreas Surgery (IGoMIPS).意大利国家微创胰腺手术注册中心:意大利微创胰腺手术小组(IGoMIPS)的一项倡议。
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00808-4. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
Framework for Training in Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery: An International Delphi Consensus Study.微创胰腺外科培训框架:一项国际德尔菲共识研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Sep 1;235(3):383-390. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000278. Epub 2022 May 20.
7
International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM-HBP Surgery Project.国际微创远端胰腺切除术精准解剖专家共识:PAM-HBP 外科项目。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Jan;29(1):161-173. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1071. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
8
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Expert Consensus Guidelines: How to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection.专家共识指南:如何安全地进行微创解剖性肝切除术。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Jan;29(1):16-32. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1079. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
Designing the European registry on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a pan-European survey.设计欧洲微创胰腺外科登记处:一项泛欧调查。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Apr;23(4):566-574. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of a robotic surgical platform for the treatment of patients with malignant or pre-malignant pancreatic tumors at the University Medical Center Ljubljana.在卢布尔雅那大学医学中心实施用于治疗恶性或癌前胰腺肿瘤患者的机器人手术平台。
Radiol Oncol. 2025 Sep 5;59(3):425-434. doi: 10.2478/raon-2025-0051. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
2
Illuminating the Uncinate: Advanced Indocyanine Green Fluorescence and Ultrasound-Guided Robotic Enucleation of a Pancreatic Insulinoma in a Challenging Position.照亮钩突部:在具有挑战性位置的胰腺胰岛素瘤的先进吲哚菁绿荧光和超声引导下机器人摘除术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18310-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:多中心分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Mar 12;108(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa039.
3
Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3).
Early Experience with Robotic Pancreatic Resections: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 20 Consecutive Cases.
机器人胰腺切除术的早期经验:对连续20例病例的回顾性队列研究
Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Jun;20(2):151-159. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.151.
4
Prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.胰腺手术中的预防性腹腔引流:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Aug 29;410(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03763-z.
5
Survival Study: International Multicentric Pancreatic Left Resections (SIMPLR-2): Does Surgical Approach Matter for Recurrence-Free Survival and Overall Survival?生存研究:国际多中心胰腺左半切除术(SIMPLR - 2):手术方式对无复发生存率和总生存率有影响吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;17(16):2659. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162659.
6
Case Report: A rare case of hemorrhagic cystic IPAS masquerading as pancreatic neoplasm.病例报告:一例罕见的出血性囊性胰岛细胞瘤伪装成胰腺肿瘤。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 11;15:1626836. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1626836. eCollection 2025.
7
Evolving survival patterns in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a 23-year retrospective observational analysis.胰腺腺癌生存模式的演变:一项23年的回顾性观察分析。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 30;16(3):1280-1286. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2024-942. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
8
Robotic distal pancreatectomy using two-surgeon technique (TAKUMI-4): a technical note and initial outcomes.采用双术者技术的机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(TAKUMI-4):技术说明及初步结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jun 2;410(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03751-3.
9
Laparoscopic management of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas: Two case reports and review of literature.腹腔镜治疗胰腺导管内嗜酸性乳头状肿瘤:两例报告并文献复习
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):105096. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.105096.
10
Impact of visceral fat area on surgical difficulty during robotic distal pancreatectomy (TAKUMI-2).内脏脂肪面积对机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(TAKUMI-2)手术难度的影响
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3137-3145. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11696-3. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
多中心机器人胰十二指肠切除术培训项目(LAELAPS-3)的结果。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e886-e895. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
4
Laparoscopic versus Robotic Peripheral Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助胰体尾切除术的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J BUON. 2020 Sep-Oct;25(5):2456-2475.
5
Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Methods Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.三种微创方法与开腹胰体尾切除术的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Sep 2;31(1):104-112. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000846.
6
Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术住院时间的比较:随机对照试验。
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1281-1288. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11554. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
7
Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.机器人与开腹胰十二指肠切除术:短期结局的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):501-509. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07084-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
8
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of different surgical approaches for pancreaticoduodenectomy.一种针对胰十二指肠切除术不同手术入路的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Mar;22(3):329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.016. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection.《迈阿密微创胰腺切除术循证指南》。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):1-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590.
10
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):54-66. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003309.