Horwitz Daniel Scott, Mahmoud Ahmed Nageeb, Suk Michael
From the Orthopedic Surgery Department, Orthopedic Trauma Unit, Geisinger Medical Center (Horwitz, Mahmoud and Suk), Danville, PA, and the Orthopedic Surgery Department, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine (Mahmoud), Cairo, Egypt.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Oct 1;33(19):1071-1081. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01018. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
Intermediate length (235 to 240 mm) cephalomedullary nails have been introduced as alternatives to the classic short and long cephalomedullary nails for the management of different types of proximal femur fractures. Recently, they have gained popularity among many surgeons because of the ease of distal locking screw insertion compared with long nails and the additional diaphyseal fit they provide compared with short nails. Despite their increasing popularity, the literature offers limited guidance on their ideal indications, with few studies comparing their outcomes with those of short and long nails. In this review, we aim to explore the potential indications for intermediate length cephalomedullary nails and examine the existing literature on their outcomes in the treatment of proximal femur fractures, highlighting the comparative studies.
中等长度(235至240毫米)的髓内钉已被引入,作为经典短髓内钉和长髓内钉的替代方案,用于治疗不同类型的股骨近端骨折。最近,与长髓内钉相比,它们因远端锁定螺钉插入更容易,且与短髓内钉相比能提供额外的骨干贴合度,而在许多外科医生中受到欢迎。尽管它们越来越受欢迎,但文献中关于其理想适应证的指导有限,很少有研究将其结果与短髓内钉和长髓内钉的结果进行比较。在本综述中,我们旨在探讨中等长度髓内钉的潜在适应证,并研究关于其治疗股骨近端骨折结果的现有文献,重点关注比较研究。