Gavira Javier, Auclin Edouard, Rey-Cardenas Macarena, Roy Pritha, Tapia Jose C, Nay Paula, Vinceneux Armelle, Lefort Felix, Nannini Simon, Randis Adela Maria Del Carmen, Naoun Natacha, Escudier Bernard, Borchiellini Delphine, de Velasco Guillermo, Barthelemy Philippe, Gross-Goupil Marine, Negrier Sylvie, Oudard Stéphane, Frazer Ricky D, Albiges Laurence, Flippot Ronan
Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Eur J Cancer. 2025 May 2;220:115389. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115389. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Lenvatinib's activity after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combination therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. We aimed to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) treated with lenvatinib after failure of the prior standard of care.
Multicenter retrospective study including patients with mRCC treated with lenvatinib-based therapies beyond first-line therapy between 2020 and 2024. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.
We included 133 patients, with a median age of 61 years. Clear-cell was the main subtype (82.0 %). Before lenvatinib treatment, 15.8 %, 51.9 %, and 27.8 % of patients showed favorable, intermediate, and poor risk disease, respectively, according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Moreover, patients received a median of 3 previous lines of treatment, including ICIs (90.2 %) and cabozantinib (90.2 %). Lenvatinib was given alone (45.9 %) or in combination with everolimus (33.8 %), pembrolizumab (18.0 %) or investigational agents (2.3 %). The ORR and DCR were 29.1 % and 67.7 %, respectively, with no differences between regimens or lines of treatment. With a median follow-up time of 13.5 months, the median TTF and OS were 6.2 and 9.6 months. Toxicity was manageable with dose modifications required in 34.6 %. The discontinuation rate was 9.8 %, with one toxic death.
Lenvatinib-based regimens were active and safe for heavily pre-treated patients with mRCC. These findings provide evidence to support its use in daily practice.
乐伐替尼在肾细胞癌(RCC)免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合治疗后的活性尚不清楚。我们旨在描述转移性RCC(mRCC)患者在先前标准治疗失败后接受乐伐替尼治疗的真实世界结局。
多中心回顾性研究,纳入2020年至2024年间接受基于乐伐替尼治疗的一线以上治疗的mRCC患者。主要终点为客观缓解率(ORR)和治疗失败时间(TTF)。次要终点包括疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。
我们纳入了133例患者,中位年龄为61岁。透明细胞是主要亚型(82.0%)。根据国际转移性RCC数据库联盟(IMDC)标准,在乐伐替尼治疗前,分别有15.8%、51.9%和27.8%的患者表现为低危、中危和高危疾病。此外,患者接受的中位治疗线数为3线,包括ICI(90.2%)和卡博替尼(90.2%)。乐伐替尼单独使用(45.9%)或与依维莫司(33.8%)、帕博利珠单抗(18.0%)或研究药物(2.3%)联合使用。ORR和DCR分别为29.1%和67.7%,不同治疗方案或治疗线数之间无差异。中位随访时间为13.5个月,中位TTF和OS分别为6.2个月和9.6个月。34.6%的患者需要调整剂量来控制毒性。停药率为9.8%,有1例因毒性死亡。
基于乐伐替尼的治疗方案对经过大量预处理的mRCC患者有效且安全。这些发现为其在日常实践中的应用提供了证据支持。