Bambas Alina Zoe, Wahidie Diana, Yilmaz-Aslan Yüce, Brzoska Patrick, Kiessling Claudia
Education of Personal and Interpersonal Competencies in Health Care, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, Witten, 58455, Germany.
Department Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12567-2.
Active patient involvement and attention to patient preferences in patient-provider consultations are increasingly recognized as essential to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. Aim of the review was to provide an overview of questionnaires that measure patient preferences regarding communication, information provision and involvement in decision-making in patient-provider consultations.
Inclusion criteria were studies that provided primary data, were published in German or English, and included adult patients. The systematic search was conducted in PubMed and PsycInfo. Data extraction and summary focused on information about the development process, topic and structure, and reliability of instruments.
Of 6,667 abstracts screened, 34 articles were included, describing 37 different instruments, often originating from an Anglo-American context. Twelve articles reported patient involvement in the development process. Majority of questionnaires measures aspects of information and/or decision-making preferences. Fewer instruments focus on patient-centeredness or communication preferences. Length of questionnaires varied from one to 80 items. Only 15 studies reported reliability indices.
Due to the heterogeneous description, a more consistent reporting of data would be desirable for future publications as well as more participatory research.
Although there is a wide range of questionnaires available, more research is needed to determine the extent to which they can be used in everyday clinical practice to elicit preferences from individual patients with a wide range of conditions and cultural backgrounds.
在医患咨询中,患者的积极参与以及对患者偏好的关注日益被视为提高患者满意度和治疗效果的关键因素。本综述的目的是概述用于衡量患者在医患咨询中关于沟通、信息提供和决策参与方面偏好的问卷。
纳入标准为提供原始数据、以德语或英语发表且包含成年患者的研究。在PubMed和PsycInfo中进行系统检索。数据提取和总结聚焦于工具的开发过程、主题与结构以及可靠性方面的信息。
在筛选的6667篇摘要中,纳入了34篇文章,描述了37种不同的工具,这些工具大多源自英美背景。12篇文章报告了患者参与开发过程的情况。大多数问卷测量信息和/或决策偏好方面。较少有工具关注以患者为中心或沟通偏好。问卷长度从1项到80项不等。只有15项研究报告了可靠性指标。
由于描述的异质性,未来的出版物以及更多参与性研究需要更一致的数据报告。
尽管有大量问卷可用,但仍需要更多研究来确定它们在日常临床实践中能在多大程度上用于从具有广泛病情和文化背景的个体患者中引出偏好。