Suppr超能文献

使用标准化报告和评估工具提高手术发病率和死亡率会议的质量:来自美国一家大型学术医疗中心的验证研究

Improving the quality of surgical morbidity and mortality conference using a standardized reporting and assessment tool: a validation study from a large academic medical center in the United States.

作者信息

Dermody Sarah M, Thorne Marc C, Morrison Robert J

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 1904, 48109, Taubman, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Apr 4;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00433-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) Improve the quality of Morbidity and Mortality conferences by developing a standardized presentation template and assessment tool; (2) Assess the intervention impact by comparing pre- and post-intervention data.

METHODS

A pre-post study was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center between January 2022- January 2023. A standardized presentation template was created and a short assessment tool was developed to evaluate the quality of presentations on eight domains. We hypothesized that development of this template would significantly improve the quality of M&M conferences. Pre- and post-intervention data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test to evaluate for significant differences. Effect sizes for each domain were assessed by Cohen's d.

RESULTS

A total of 127 pre-intervention responses and 61 post-intervention responses were received over a six-month period. Statistically significant increases in post-intervention scores were noted in nearly all presentation domains, including clarity of case selection rationale, nature of the safety event, circumstances leading to the safety event, contributing factors, understanding of the safety event, and anticipated benefits to patient outcomes (p < 0.05). The effect sizes ranged from medium for rationale for case selection to small for the identification of corrective actions.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a standardized, guided template improved the quality of Morbidity and Mortality presentations, with medium effect sizes and statistically significant increases in nearly all surveyed domains. A ceiling effect in the overall assessment score was noted as presentations prior to the intervention were rated highly. Standardization of case selection and presentations can promote alignment of the Quality Improvement Morbidity and Mortality workflow with broader-scope initiatives, departmentally and institutionally.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的有两个:(1)通过开发标准化的报告模板和评估工具来提高发病率和死亡率会议的质量;(2)通过比较干预前后的数据来评估干预效果。

方法

于2022年1月至2023年1月在一家三级医疗学术医学中心进行了一项前后对照研究。创建了一个标准化的报告模板,并开发了一个简短的评估工具来评估八个领域的报告质量。我们假设这个模板的开发将显著提高发病率和死亡率会议的质量。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较干预前后的数据,以评估是否存在显著差异。每个领域的效应大小通过Cohen's d进行评估。

结果

在六个月的时间里,共收到127份干预前回复和61份干预后回复。几乎所有报告领域的干预后得分都有统计学上的显著提高,包括病例选择理由的清晰度、安全事件的性质、导致安全事件的情况、促成因素、对安全事件的理解以及对患者预后的预期益处(p < 0.05)。效应大小从中等(病例选择理由)到小(纠正措施的识别)不等。

结论

引入标准化的指导模板提高了发病率和死亡率报告的质量,效应大小为中等,几乎所有调查领域都有统计学上的显著提高。由于干预前的报告评分较高,因此在总体评估得分中发现了天花板效应。病例选择和报告的标准化可以促进质量改进发病率和死亡率工作流程与部门和机构范围内更广泛举措的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3041/11971917/2430da13f4b7/13037_2025_433_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验