Suppr超能文献

外科医生对手术发病率和死亡率会议的看法和差异:美国外科医师学院理事会调查的报告。

Surgeon Perceptions and Variations in Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conference: Report of a Survey from the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2024 Nov;81(11):1538-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.018. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the evolution of surgical morbidity and mortality conferences (MMCs) from the early 20 century as a means of identifying surgeon error into current practices as identifying hospital-based system factors that contribute to adverse patient events. Further, to elucidate differences in the perception of MMCs between trainees and attending surgeons as well as differences in the structure of MMCs geographically and by institution type.

DESIGN

We developed a survey that was distributed to current American College of Surgeon members through Survey Monkey.

SETTING

Survey-based study.

PARTICIPANTS

Current members of the American College of Surgeons, including Board of Governors, surgeons, and trainees.

RESULTS

There were a total of 1,396 responses to the survey, 814 (58%) from surgical trainees and 582 (42%) from attending surgeons. Both surgical trainees and attending surgeons noted that the most common day for MMCs was Wednesday and that the most common time for MMCs was before 7:30 AM. Further, most surgical trainees and attending surgeons noted that there was no structured format to their institution's MMCs and that increased attending surgeon engagement would make MMCs more educational. Significant variations in MMCs existed across both geographic region and by institution type.

CONCLUSION

The results from this survey highlight key aspects of MMCs that contribute to their educational value. Staff engagement was noted to be the most educational aspect of MMCs. While geographic and institutional differences will likely persist, efforts should be made to increase staff engagement at MMCs in addition to a more structured approach.

摘要

目的

强调外科发病率和死亡率会议(MMC)从 20 世纪初作为识别外科医生错误的手段的演变,到当前识别导致患者不良事件的医院系统因素的实践。此外,阐明受训者和主治外科医生对 MMC 的看法差异,以及 MMC 在地理和机构类型上的结构差异。

设计

我们开发了一项通过 Survey Monkey 分发给美国外科医师学院现任成员的调查。

设置

基于调查的研究。

参与者

美国外科医师学院的现任成员,包括理事会成员、外科医生和受训者。

结果

共有 1396 人对调查做出了回应,其中 814 人(58%)来自外科受训者,582 人(42%)来自主治外科医生。外科受训者和主治外科医生都指出,MMC 最常见的日子是星期三,MMC 最常见的时间是早上 7:30 之前。此外,大多数外科受训者和主治外科医生指出,他们所在机构的 MMC 没有结构化的模式,增加主治外科医生的参与度将使 MMC 更具教育意义。在地理区域和机构类型上,MMC 都存在显著差异。

结论

这项调查的结果强调了 MMC 对其教育价值有贡献的关键方面。员工参与被认为是 MMC 最具教育意义的方面。虽然地理和机构差异可能会持续存在,但除了更结构化的方法外,还应努力增加 MMC 中的员工参与度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验