Vicario Tommasa, Menichelli Danilo, Mascolo Alfredo Paolo, Diomedi Marina, Cerretti Sara, Marconi Francesco, Pignatelli Pasquale, Paganelli Carla, Pastori Daniele
Emergency Department, Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Apr;58(4):576-584. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03095-1. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are non-inferior to Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in preventing ischemic stroke (IS) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, there are limited data regarding stroke severity and prognosis of patients admitted with IS during DOAC treatment. We performed a single center retrospective study including patients with AF on oral anticoagulants admitted to the Emergency Department for IS were included. The primary endpoint was to analyse the severity of stroke evaluated through NIHSS scale according to anticoagulant therapy. The secondary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality. A total of 106 AF patients were included, with a mean age of 81.3 ± 7.5 years. Overall, 54.7% were women and 61.3% on DOAC. The AF patients on DOAC were older, with no other clinical differences. Median NIHSS was 12 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 5-19). At multivariable logistic regression analysis DOAC use (compared to warfarin) was associated with lower risk of moderate-severe/severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 16) (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.355, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.127-0.995). Mechanical thrombectomy was strongly associated with higher severity of stroke (OR 6.113, 95%CI 2.186-17.099). During follow-up, 42 patients died. DOAC use inversely correlated with mortality risk (OR 0.323, 95%CI 0.127-0.822) after adjusting for CHADS-VASc, time to hospital admission from symptom onset and type of acute treatment. In conclusion, in our contemporary real-world population, patients on DOACs treatment admitted for IS had better outcomes in terms of stroke severity and all-cause mortality compared with patients on VKAs.
尽管在预防心房颤动(AF)患者的缺血性卒中(IS)方面,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)并不逊色于维生素K拮抗剂(VKA),但关于DOAC治疗期间因IS入院患者的卒中严重程度和预后的数据有限。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了因IS入住急诊科且正在接受口服抗凝剂治疗的AF患者。主要终点是根据抗凝治疗,通过美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评估卒中的严重程度。次要终点是3个月全因死亡率。共纳入106例AF患者,平均年龄81.3±7.5岁。总体而言,54.7%为女性,61.3%使用DOAC。使用DOAC的AF患者年龄更大,无其他临床差异。NIHSS中位数为12(四分位间距[IQR]5 - 19)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,使用DOAC(与华法林相比)与中度 - 重度/重度卒中(NIHSS≥16)风险较低相关(比值比[OR]0.355,95%置信区间[95%CI]0.127 - 0.995)。机械取栓与更高的卒中严重程度密切相关(OR 6.113,95%CI 2.186 - 17.099)。在随访期间,42例患者死亡。在调整CHADS - VASc、症状发作至入院时间和急性治疗类型后,DOAC的使用与死亡风险呈负相关(OR 0.323,95%CI 0.127 - 0.822)。总之,在我们当代的真实世界人群中,因IS入院接受DOAC治疗的患者与接受VKA治疗的患者相比,在卒中严重程度和全因死亡率方面有更好的结局。