Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcome and Preceding Anticoagulation: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity and clinical course are less known in direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) users. We aimed to explore the outcome of AIS in patients pretreated with vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) and DOAC.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed. Patients pretreated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation admitted for AIS in a stroke unit between 2016-01-01 and 2018-08-31 were included. The primary endpoint was mortality during the hospital stay, and secondary endpoints were neurologic improvement at stroke unit discharge and good functional outcome 90 days after AIS.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were included (83 on VKA and 73 on DOAC). Stroke severity (defined by NIHSS on admission) was comparable in both groups (AVK 13.0 [4.0-20.0] versus DOAC 11.0 [4.0-17.0], P = .435). Infratherapeutic levels and/or inappropriate low dose of OAC was also similar between groups (P = .152) and was not associated with stroke severity (P = .631) or mortality (P = .788). VKA (OR 12.616, P = .035, 95%CI 1.19-133.64) and PH2 hemorrhagic transformation (OR 7.516, P = .024, 95%CI 1.31-43.20) were associated with higher mortality in multivariate analysis. Higher stroke severity (OR .101, P < .001, 95%CI .037-.279) and VKA usage (OR .212, P = .003, 95%CI .08-.58) were associated with worse functional outcome at 3 months. Reperfusion therapy was significantly associated with neurologic improvement during stroke unit stay (OR 3.969, P = .009, 95%CI 1.42-11.11) but not with the functional outcome (P = .063).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients pretreated with DOAC admitted for AIS had a better outcome when compared to VKA, although stroke severity was similar between groups.