Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Neurology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Neurol. 2019 Sep;266(9):2263-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09412-y. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have proven at least equally effective in the prevention of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with atrial fibrillation as compared to the vitamin K antagonists (VKA), no reliable data on the severity of AIS of DOAC patients as compared to VKA is available.
Using a prospectively collected cohort of AIS patients, we performed univariate and multivariate (displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios, OR and 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI) analyses regarding the severity of AIS in patients with preceding DOAC (N = 210) versus VKA (N = 173) therapy. Additionally, we provide a sensitivity analysis considering only patients with warranted therapeutic anticoagulation activity.
In a comprehensive stroke center population, the frequency of AIS under DOAC was multiple times higher than previously reported at around 6% of all AIS and steadily increasing. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) in VKA patients (median 7, IQR 2-14) was equal to DOAC (median 5, IQR 2-16) on univariate analysis (P = 0.229). According to the multivariable linear logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounders of severe stroke, VKA was not significantly associated with higher NIHSS scores (β - 0.165, 95% CI - 1.874 to 1.545, P = 0.850) as compared to DOAC. Also in the sensitivity analysis considering only patients with warranted therapeutic OAC therapy, VKA was not significantly associated with higher NIHSS scores (β - 1.392, 95% CI - 3.506 to 0.721, P = 0.195) as compared to DOAC. However, VKA as compared to DOAC was significantly associated with lower rates of good functional outcome at three months (0.527, 95% CI 0.300-0.928), but not with increased mortality (aOR 1.825, 95% CI 0.780-4.273).
Ischemic stroke in patients taking DOAC is an important and frequent scenario. Stroke severity in our real world population dataset is equal in patients taking VKA and DOAC, also in the case of warranted anticoagulation therapy. Preceding VKA as compared to DOAC was associated with lower rates of good functional outcome without excess mortality, but a causal relationship cannot be proven by our study design.
与维生素 K 拮抗剂 (VKA) 相比,直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 已被证明在预防心房颤动患者急性缺血性卒中 (AIS) 方面至少同样有效,但尚无关于 DOAC 患者 AIS 严重程度的可靠数据。
我们使用前瞻性收集的 AIS 患者队列,对接受 DOAC(N=210)与 VKA(N=173)治疗的患者的 AIS 严重程度进行单变量和多变量(显示为调整后的比值比,OR 和 95%置信区间,95%CI)分析。此外,我们提供了仅考虑有治疗性抗凝活性适应证的患者的敏感性分析。
在综合卒中中心人群中,DOAC 下 AIS 的频率高于此前报道的约 6%,且呈稳步上升趋势。VKA 患者的国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分(中位数 7,IQR 2-14)与 DOAC 患者(中位数 5,IQR 2-16)相当(单变量分析,P=0.229)。根据多变量线性逻辑回归分析,在校正严重卒中的混杂因素后,VKA 与 NIHSS 评分较高(β-0.165,95%CI-1.874 至 1.545,P=0.850)无显著相关性。在仅考虑有治疗性 OAC 治疗适应证的患者的敏感性分析中,VKA 与 NIHSS 评分较高(β-1.392,95%CI-3.506 至 0.721,P=0.195)无显著相关性。然而,与 DOAC 相比,VKA 与 3 个月时良好功能结局的较低发生率(0.527,95%CI 0.300-0.928)显著相关,但与死亡率增加(aOR 1.825,95%CI 0.780-4.273)无关。
服用 DOAC 的患者发生缺血性卒中是一个重要且常见的情况。我们的真实世界人群数据集显示,在有抗凝治疗适应证的情况下,VKA 和 DOAC 患者的卒中严重程度相同。与 DOAC 相比,VKA 与良好功能结局的较低发生率相关(0.527,95%CI 0.300-0.928),但没有额外的死亡率,但我们的研究设计无法证明这种因果关系。